alaska, the methane rule, what does it add up to in terms of tangible material harm? >> this action here, against the minimum -- de minimis impact to industry economic impact bottom line, we're going get five million metric tons of methane pollution which could heat four million homes a year if it was in the market. and at the same time, it's this -- >> wait, is that just going to be put in the air? that's just going to be put in the air? >> yes, or leaked into the atmosphere in some fashion, yes. and at the same time, with the clean power plant as you pointed out, we have pulling out of paris, we have an application of any investment in the clean energy. and i think chris and i would both admit that that we did a lot of things, a lot of things to advance the efforts to lead on climate. but even then we knew those are the first important steps and know where near enough. >> yeah. >> so it's not just the impact of the rule. we're going backwards at exactly the moment we need to be racing forward as fast as possible to