argued that the only reason the attorney general james is investigating is because she doesn't like donald trump. to which, the judge said that, as has often been, said that it prosecutor dislike someone does not prevent a prosecution. it is not unusual for prosecutors to hate the person they are prosecuting. the validity of the prosecution turns entirely on the evidence. to that point, that judge said that the office of attorney general's investigation is hardly unsubstantiated. indeed, this courts in camera view of the thousands of documents responsive to the office of attorney generals prior subpoenas demonstrates that the office of attorney general has a sufficient basis for continuing its investigation, which undercuts the notion that this ongoing investigation is based on personal animus, not facts and law. so, there is the judge, again, saying that he has personally