the sexual assault and actual malice. so the judge will give these rulings. he's going to put on record that he thinks it's fair game if trump plans to take the stand that all of these findings from years of litigation can or cannot be used to confront him and inform him to you know buyer be ware. if he decides to actually take that step. >> and joyce. the thought of being cross examineed about being repeated incidents showing you're a liar would be enough to keep most defendants from testifying. it know it would keep me off the stand. but what about trump? >> i guess that's the question here, right. i mean the job for the judge when he looks at each of these incidents, he has to determine whether the evidence has very important value for prosecutors. so much so that it outweighs any risk of undue prejudice to donald trump. those are the two equitys he has to balance. the courts in new york have said that's a decision that