Make sure to sill reasons Electronic Devices to not upon interrupt. The board of supervisors committees convening hybrid meetings in person comment special providing Remote Access and Public Comment via phone. The Public Comment taken on each item. Those in person will be allowed speak first then those on the phone line. For those watching remotely, public call in number is streaming and when connected you will hear the meeting discussions but in listening mode only. When your item come up and Public Comment is called those in person lineup and on the phone dial star 3 to be added to the line. If youor on your phone turn down your listening devices. Each will be allowed up to 2 minutes to speak. We have chinese for item 10 when called well have the instruction in language. Alternateively submit comment in wroiting in the following ways. E mail them to myself the budget and finance clerk. Brent. Jalipa sfgov. Org. If you submit it e mail tell are forkeded and included part of the official file. You may send written comments u. S. Postal service to city hall 1 dr. Carlton b. Goodlett place room 244, San Francisco, california, 9410 two. Items acted upon today will apreer on the board of supervisors agenda of september 12, unless otherwise stated. Thank you, mr. Clerk. Buffer call item 1. I would like to remind everyone that when we have items that have budget and legislative Analyst Reports we will have the Department Presentation first and the report of and then to public upon comment. And for todays agenda those items are 2, 3, 7 and 8 and with that mr. Clerk, call item 1. Item 1, is a resolution exempting from the Competitive Bidding policy the potential real estate transaction involving port property at seawall lot 3 huh01 and pier 5llc for development of a mix use property urging the port and the Fishermans Wharf llc to engage in out roach to affected and interested neighbors. Community members and others to ensure the project is designed with public input and urging with the assistance of staff the City Attorney and other city officials to take all actions needed to negotiate a negotiating agreement and a term sheet with the Fishermans Wharf revitalize. Consistent with this resolution. Members will join remote and comment on this resolution. Press star 3 to enter the line. A prompt will indicate you raised your hand. That will be your queue top begin comments. Thank you. Today i want to acknowledge we have president supervisor peskin here this. Is the sponsor of the item and would like to have opening remark . Thank you. Budget chair chan. And member vice chair mandelman. Thank you for scheduling this since our summer recess. As we saw yesterday in john kings reporting Fishermans Wharf is part of San Francisco that is one of the keys that lace the golden egg a play where locals and visitors from around the country and the world can have an authentic experience on the shores of the bay temperature is a part early and on going history and indeed is a bit tarnished and has plenty of opportunity and i say that as the port of San Francisco and the city and situated cities and place around the state grapple with infrastructure challenges. The port of San Francisco that will hear from shortly from mr. Mike martin, has been exploring the opportunity for revitalization at Fishermans Wharf in and around pier 45 that had infrastructure challenges and business challenge this is is at the heart of the celebrated wharf. The Fishermans Wharf llc has been in front of the Port Commission on a couple of occasions commission and staff a minirequest for proposals and today, i brought with you with the support of the mayor resolution exempting from the Competitive Bidding process, the proposal from pier 45, which if passed by the board of supervisors would authorize negotiations between Fishermans Wharf and the port of San Francisco which would will flult this board reviewing the negotiating agreement and approve it itself as well as steps along the way there are plenty of opportunity for public input and plenty of opportunity for over site in the months ahead. And where that, madam chair and supervisors, i would like to welcome mike martin from the port. And then lou and his team at Fishermans Wharf revitalize. Thank you. Thank you, president supervisor peskin for guiding this through the proechlsz i would like to be added, mr. Clerk, as a sponsor to this. Really appreciate the thought that has gone into this to this point of as a matter of policy it is not usual we have a soul source the plan allows for proposals and i think that time and this proposal is right for San Francisco. I look forward to the negotiation process this is one that has the opportunity and the ability to help revitalize the most important parts of San Francisco waterfront and one that has a tradition and i appreciate the time, thought and effort that has been put in the proposal to not only highlight and exent wait the history and culture but lift up and bring a new vision for what the waterfront can be. There is a lot of really serious people behind this proposal that have a track record of success of investing in the city. And i think that means something when you are bring an unsolicited contract. In this instance. And if we are all being honest, the need for Fishermans Wharf refresh is clear. Proposal in front us really hit its on the head. I want to thank supervisor supervisor peskin for ushering this through and thank mr. Jawedo and his team at a time had San Francisco needs the new vision and help reimagining itself. Thank you other look forward to the negotiation process. Im excited about the proposal in front us today. Thank you. Thank you. Mr. Martin. Y good morning, chair chan. Mike martin, port of San Francisco. Pleased to be before to you talk about the proposed waiver of the Competitive Bidding policy relating to the proposal for the Fishermans Wharf revitalized llc it is proposal to develop the triangle parking lot in the center of the wharf, seawall a mixed of visitor attractive uses that both are all trust consistent and intended not only to create now reasons for locals and visitors to come to the wharf but elevate as supervisor supervisor peskin says the history and the organic thing what made it an attraction. It is comprised of giraudo and seth i will invite them up for the proposal at the end. My focus is the press to get here. As was described in the beginning of introduction to this item the Port Commission adopted an updated waterfront plan that includes a process by which port staff seek out take holder input on Development Proposals to provide to the board and inform the decision about waiver of Competitive Bidding. Pursuing that we scheduled 3 Community Meeting in march. We returned to the Port Commission on april 25 to sum rise and get input from the commission about interests in the project. Coming out of that discussion we issued an ask for information from those good in developing the defined proposal. I will talk about this in a minute bh what we heard. After that we return to the port on july 7, presenting the results the Port Commission heard more and adopted a resolution recommending your approval of this waiver. We issued a request for information in may of this year and the request was intends to say, is there development interests. We have a proposal and i think there is a reason for the bidding proposal and that it gets the competitive process to gift estate best possible options for any given development opportunity. The question for interest intended say, are there other interests this have current interests in this investment . Where we see Fishermans Wharf benefit from an investment and it is a sort of in between time in San Franciscos history where investments are sort ofup certain. We received 2 responses to the rfi one from the proposers to augment and explain their vision and received a response if the tenant its the budeen flagship. That did in the indicate an interest in a Development Proposal but an interest in participating to improve lot with better uses. In light of that feedback, we as staff were very recommending to the commission to move forward with the resolution in july. We see that competitive process would without interests is something lose time we would not like to lose. And we showed this slide here not for the details but to say we near an early point in the time line. And if you approve this waiver we go to the port and ask them to approve a negotiation agreement that would kickoff not only Detailed Design and analysis of the proposal but further stake holder discussions to address when were hear burglar when we want to do to safe guard the Fishermans Wharf while we improve temperature figure out where the gear storage and the processing industry can thrive and elevate in the the way the proposal would like to see t. We have 2436 months after will we approve that. Well come become to the board of supervisors with a bit clearer picture that would be a jumping off point for Environmental Review and clarify it further. With these being the backgrounds facts i think we would appreciate your consideration and approval of this waiver. I would like to stands aside and invite mr. Giraudo to come up and say a few words. Thank you very much for allowing mow to come up to talk about Fishermans Wharf revitalize it is an important project to us and you and the city and the people who work at Fishermans Wharf. Im a native of San Francisco not a dwerp. A busy person who believes in San Francisco and tried to give back and will continue to do so. I of course this is an opportunity to work with everyone all of the stake holders. Some whom today restaurant oours from the wharf. Fran families here. We have a vision preserving a legacy and creating a new one. Which focuses on fisherman, fisher people and the fishing industry as it was and should be in San Francisco. And in Northern California the center of the fishing industry. We have done a lot of work there is interests on the part of people in the fishing industry and the Restaurant Industry that provides that work Fishermans Wharf. We believe tla those occurrence expressed the port lead are being addressd and will be addressd and end up with a project that provides jobs, provides legacy and provides pride. To all of those involved. I would urge to you pass this on to the board so we can move this along. And with a goal of being able to deliver to the people San Francisco a new revitalized Fishermans Wharf. Thank you. Public comment . Y lets go to Public Comment. Before we do this supervisor vice chair mandelman. Thank you, thanks to our port staff and everyone worked on this. Id like to be added as a cosponsor. Thank you and lets go to Public Comment. Thank you for those interested in Public Comment on item 1 now is the time to line and up for those joining remotely press star 3 and wait until the system indicates you have been unmuted. Seeing no in person speakers here. We have none in the queue Public Comment is closed. Colleagues i think you know always a sole source negotiation, i look forward to learning more about the actual plan. It is my hope that i do believe this is in good hands with more giraudo with president supervisor peskin and the port. That we will find ways to support local business and find ways to support our local fishermen and a sustainable fishing infrastructure in Fishermans Wharf for the longhaul for the future generations. It is time we invest in this and i look forward to this coming become to us with more details and with that, colleagues i would like to move this to full board with recommendation. And like to have a roll call and on this motion. To forward this to the full board with positive recommendation vice chair mandelman. Aye. Member safai. Aye. Chair chan. Aye. Thank you, the motion passes. Thank you, thank you. And mr. Clerk call item 2. Item 2 a resolution approving a Maintenance Agreement with the city and count and he California Department of transportation for the citys maintenance of on rightofway within cal trance jurisdiction at the southeast corner of 17th and san bruno and southwest of 17th and vermont for the potrero public art project. And the citys indem nifkz of caltrans for reasons of anything oshg mitted by the city under the agreement and approval of the resolution. For those entering now. We are conduct business if you can keep voice down. On the way in. Thank you. Members joining remote low and wish to comment on this press star 3 to enter the line. Madam chair. Thank you. Im going to speak in chinese quick. All right. Well have item 2 this one has budget and legislative Analyst Report and today i believe we have trent teaker. Project manager from upon department of public works for this item. Thank you. Thank you. The presentation on the computer or do i need to bring that . I sent in yesterday. Gi believe you were given instructions to bring it in we have no capacity to share t. Apologies. But i have my notes anyway. So good morning chair and supervisors im trent tiger project manager at public work in the street scape group here to talk about the potrero project for public art work agenda item. A background on the project for those not aware. It is a street scape project on 17th street and around the 101 freeway with san bruno and vermont. It is in construction and anticipated to be completed early 2024. The project includes infrastructure, safety improve ams and aesthetic improvements. And it is o caltrans and the public side of rightofways. The scope highlights as far as the safety end is installing new ad a compliant walks and curb ramps. Concerner bulb outs. New protected bicycle lane. Retaining walls and stabilization on the hill size. New lighting and native local landscaping and terrace retaining walls. And the last item we are here to discuss the public art work. Part of the project the Sf Arts Commission to select a local artist for the installation of wart works a Panel Members from the Arts Commission. Public works and several Community Members reviewed proposals from local artists and the artist future forums selected install sculptors on 17th and san bruno and 17th and vermont. And on to the exact item we are here today. Part of this intallation on caltrans property and need a permit for it. Part of the art work permit a Maintenance Agreement is signed with caltrans and the city. And requesting the board presume to move forward with the Maintenance Agreement and finalize the permit application. Because caltrans requires the applicant to maintain the art work we are expected to perform activities routine maintenance and inspections and Emergency Repairs and removal of if necessary by caltrans in the case they deem it not maintained or up to standard or operations required to be removed the city would remove it. But assuming that nothing catastrophic happens assume it will be graffiti abatement. Weeding and landscaping. Separate low from the agreement with caltrans and the city, the city signed an agreement with the dog pap and northwest potrero gbd to provide maintenance for Infrastructure Improvement and the art work. Under that would perform routine maintenance graffiti, landscaping and things of that nature. Over all, i think this will be a great project that installs to a lighted caltrans space. A lot of beautification the community that spearheaded and got the city rallied and up they are excited for this i hope that we are all in agreement with that today. If you have questions let me know and the project america from the Arts Commission is here if you have questions about the art work or selection process. Thank you. Thank you. Bla report . Good morningful supervisors nick from budget analyst office. Item 2 a resolution that approved a Maintenance Agreement between caltrans and the city for mai