Today. Thursday, april 6th. 10 10. I would like to get you started and im the vice chair of the committee. And to my left is supervisor tang and the chair colin willing here shortly. She is stuck in traffic and she wanted us to start and not delay so that people dont have to wait around. I want to thank linda wong who is the clerk of todays clerk. And also sfgov tv, who tapes every meeting and is available to the public after that. And i want to thank the staff there. Madam clerk, there are any other nounsments . Yes, silence all cell phones and Electronic Device and completed speaker cards to be part of the file should be submitted to the clerk items it acted upon today should be on the april, 8th board agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you, why dont you go ahead and call item one. Resolution, retroacting the public of health. To accept and expend a grant in the amount of 1,336,000 from the California Department of Public Health to participate in a program entitled hiv care Program Supplemental for the period of november 30, 2016, through september 29, 2017; and waiving indirect costs. Okay. So with this presentation. Good morning, supervisors my name is dean and i am the administrator of the hiv sections and i i am here to request the retroactive approval of the grand in the amount of 1336 million, in the one time funds, this came from the state office of aid as a new opportunity for the local Health Jurisdictions to request part of an appropriation provided to them from the federal department hers and the real location of the unattended part b from the jurisdictions in the state. In late august, we were able to request the funding to enhance the existing service and support the concepts and Service Category and identify and prioritized by the state office of aids, this will allow the hiv Health Services to pass on all of this 1. 336, million to our hiv Health Service providers to expand and amend the services for clients and nine separate programs. And based on the priorities of the funding announcement and the services are provided from november, 30th, 2016 to september, 29, 2017 in the following Service Categories oral, health, Supportive Housing, and one time increase to existing housing subsidies funded with the local fund dollars and the Hospice Services and Outpatient Services and the food and meals and client insensitive vouchers and reasonable doubt pa of the hiv and aging, and the regional study and i am happy to answer any of the questions that you may have and to explain this further if you would like. It is just a quick question. Yeah. How much is the housing piece of it. There are two housing pieces of Supportive Housing is 60,000 and that was provided to one of our transitional housing programs. To provide them a one time increase for their operating expense line items. And then the other is for the increase in the housing subdy of 350,000. About a quarter of a grant. Okay. So if you have no other questions, there are any Public Comments on this item . Seeing none, is Public Comment is now closed is there a motion. All right, i see there is no matching funds and i will make a motion to send it forthwith a positive recommendation. Thank you. Passes. Item two . Hearing to consider the release of reserved funds to the Arts Commission, placed on budget and finance committee reserve by the fy20162017 annual appropriation ordinance file no. 160628 , in the amount of 62,000 to fund acoustic mitigation improvements good morning, Deputy Director from the San FranciscoArts Commission here to request release of the 62,000 put on reserve for the last budget season and this is for mid gages work for the spaces and the Veterans War Memorial building where we moved in october of 2015. I am happy to answer any questions that you have. Thank you. I did read the information in the packet and maybe just on the record, the rationale behind it. Absolutely, so the budget analyst has a great and that during the project some of the work that we are hoping to have done to mitigate the issue was not included in the work scope because of the budget issues. And so as a result, the main office areas and the private office areas, have the issues and it is difficult to have one on the cell phone or a Conference Call and it is a challenge for the meetings which are required to be audio recorded and so the sound quality of the audio is difficult to hear and so as a result, we are implementing three Different Solutions in different areas. And one is a different type of glass, which will be installed in an office, the other is a sound masking device for the main suite and finally there will be a fabric wrapped panels installed in the meeting rooms in order to help to absorb the sound. Thank you. Okay. Seeing no other questions, are there oh, yeah, the budget analyst and report. Yes, mr. Chairman, supervisor tang on page 3 of our report, we note that the table on that page shows the projected total cost of 64,000, to address the Art Commissions noise mitt indication issues and however, only, 62,000 is currently on the budget and finance committee reserve and the Art Commission advises that they will fund that additional 2469 with the existing available funds in their budget. We recommend that you approve the budget and the release of the 62,000 on reserve. Okay. Thank you very much for your report. And any Public Comments on this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. And supervisor tang. So i will take a motion to release the 62,000 from reserve. Would you like to amend the amendment . There is no amendment, right . Correct. Yeah. There is no amendment, supervisor tang, could you also please file the hearing . Yeah, so i will make a motion to release the reserves and file the hearing. Okay, with no objection, the motion passes. Madam clerk, could you call item three . Resolution approving in accordance with Internal Revenue code, section 147 f , the issuance of Revenue Bonds by the California Municipal Finance Authority in an aggregate Principal Amount not to exceed 45,000,000 to refinance all or a portion of certain outstanding debt obligations that originally financed and refinanced the acquisition, construction, equipping, and furnishing of facilities owned and managed by institute on aging, a california nonprofit Public Benefit corporation, in connection with the provision of health care and other support services for lowincome, frail older adults. Welcome back supervisor to this meeting. What is your item . My item. Okay. Before we get started with the reports then, supervisor fewer is here to speak on our item. Yes, thank you supervisor yee. Colleagues i just wanted to say that the institute on aging is in my neighborhood, and actually serves a broader senior population than just in the richmond, and it has been the life line for many seniors, city wide. And with their friendship line, 24 hour, suicide prevention, and the friendship line for seniors as well as ul of the services that they offer on a daily basis. I am proud, actually and honored to sponsor this legislation, and it is such a Wonderful Community in my neighborhood. And so i just want to give a brief introduction, and i think that today, we have michelle traveti with us. Roxanna blaze. Thank you very much. Thank you, colleagues. The institute on aging the refinancing will allow the institute to actually capture the lower interest on the bond that we have for the building. As well as net some additional cash savings which will help with the programs that we offer in the city and in the community as supervisor fewer has said. Any questions . Seeing none, item and Public Comments on this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. Supervisor tang. I will make a motion to send forth this resolution, with the positive recommendation to the full board. With no objection, then the motion passes. Thank you very much, the next item actually is number four, but we are going to skip over that and wait for the chair. She will come before us and address item four, i know that this is important issue for her. So we will wait. Lets go over to item 5. Resolution approving the recreation and Park Department general managers declaration of an emergency based on catastrophic failure of the boiler system at kezar pavilion, estimated cost more than 250,000 to repair, pursuant to administrative code, section 6. 60 b . Okay. Good morning, supervisors gary, with the recreation and parts department. I just want to give some brief background and information on the emergency declaration. And as you may or may not know, the pavilion is heavily used by a lot of our local high schools and middle schools. And the emergency was declared in december and it was critical that we made the repairs before the playoffs, and we walenburger, sorry. The gym is the home gym for the high school. And it is also used for all of the sfplayoff games as well as the state championship games, Mission High School played their games at the pa vif an and they were able to get the repairs done before the games took place and so that was, you know, definitely a positive impact on the community as you know. And so, and i, i am here to answer any other questions if you have any. Okay, i am glad that you got the boiler six, before played, and otherwise, it might have unfrozen there and that wind in the championship. Absolutely. Very important. So i saw that it is a full source contract going to the city mechanical. And of course, the explanation was getting the quotes for the bids would have delayed the work by two months, and i am just wondering how the rec park selected city mechanical. I do not have that information. But would you mind following up with me afterwards or unless there rose has that information that would be great. Madam chair, mr. Chairman, supervisor tang, that contractor was on site and i believe so that they just continued with this contractor. It was that simple. And as you know under the administrative code, in the case of a true emergency, the board permits the award of emergency contracts on a full source basis. Okay. So through the chair too, mr. Rose just to clarify, city mechanical has already under contract with the rec park in general to maintain the pavillion . Yes, okay, that is fine. So was that your report from the budget analyst mr. Rose . Yes, i would just add mr. Chairman, supervisor tang, on page 6, the budget for replacement of the pavilion, is 468,650 that is on table one on page six, and so we recommend that you amend to state that the removal of the boiler system would cost 468,650, rather than the incorrect, 455,000 and we recommend that you approve the proposed resolution as amended. Okay, can you in regards to this is april. And today is april. And the board happened in december, does it take that long to get in information to us . From rec and park . The board has a law supervisors, if you recall, that they have to submit it within 60 days and they did comply with that 60 daytime frame. Stage five we state that the Recreation Park Department declares a state of emergency to the board of supervisors on december the 20th. Of 2016. And rec and park apartment submitted the solution, declaring a state of emergency to the board on february the 14th, 2017 and so that will be within the 60 days. Okay. I am sorry, i was distracted. That is all right. On page 5 of our report we note that the recreation and parks department, general manager declares a state of emergency in a letter to the board of supervisors on december, 20th of 2016, and the recreation and Park Department submitted the resolution, Public Comment in seeing none, is there a motion . A motion to amend per the budget analyst recommendations. So that it would be cost of 468,650, and send forth as amended to the full board with a positive recommendation as amended. Okay. With no objection, the motion passes. We just finished item five and we would like to go back to item four, chair cohen is back. Could we call item four . Resolution designating the construction administrator, financial officer, and project Contact Person for a proposed project to renovate county jail no. 2; confirming the fair market land value of 6,000,000 for county jail no. 2; and conditionally assuring the staffing, operation and continued ownership of county jail no. 2. We have the chief matthew free man here to present to us. Good morning, good morning, supervisors it is a pleasure to be here with you today and it is good to see you as always. The Sheriffs Department submitted a request for proposal pursuant to sb 44, the board and the state of corrections in february of this year. And as is the case, with all of the proposals submitted to the board of state and Community Directions there is a technical review of your submission that is conducted. The technical review, completed by the board of state and community corrections, did reveal some items that needed to be contained in the board of supervisor resolution, that are requirements of the proposal. It is important to point out that in seeking this supply mental resolution, nothing whatsoever in the project has changed. The project as we briefed you prior, for the targeted renovations to the county jail number two are exactly the same as before, and this is simply approximately for technical issues that are a requirement of the proposal and there is appoints that are tied to these requirements so that it is a critical that we do get the supply mental included with our submission. And just to give you an idea, of some of the technical issues that were omitted. The names, titles, and positions of county, construction administrator project, financial officer. And project Contact Person, that needed to be contained in the resolution and it is in the supply mental resolution, and page 2, lines four through 12 on your supply mental, assurance that the county willfully staff the building that is being renovated and we have a current staffing plan that will transfer over. And the project shall provide the following site assurance for the county facility at the time of the proposal that that is contained in the supply mental page 3, lines 18 to 25. And the attestation of the current land and market value of the property where county jail number two currently resides at 425, seven street and that is what we are here for today is to seek the committee and the boards approval for the supply mental resolution to go forward as a part of our larger rfp submission. Okay. Thank you, and i would be happy to answer any questions. I am glad that you are here and i am glad that you are highlighted just the purchasely up mri mental and nothing has changed on the item that we voted for two times ago. Correct. Supervisor yee, does have a few questions, thank you. So, for your presentation and this is probably not about your presentation and probably should have been a question that i should have asked in the prior hearing. In regards to the 480, upgrade it selfare you familiar with the atms . Say it again . The upgraded for the ada. Correct. And so that is going to be and i understand that those four cells are in the maximum security confine . There are two podz that we have identified. This is adam and david pod both of these podz are exact same configuration. And they are mezzanine level podz with the beds and all of the beds on the lower level are open bay, and all of the beds on the upper level are open bay. And with the project seeks to do is to convert the upper level in each of those podz from open bay beds to the double occupancy rooms. When you installed double occupancy rooms. That does trigger a code requirement that at least one of those rooms be what they called ada compliant. And so as we move, if we are fortunate to receive an award from the state, when the architect and contractors actually go into the space, they will identify where that ada room will fit in the upper level. So then the question becomes for me then, for those that are or have to, and they are disabled . But that they would need the high security. Where will you put those individuals . If you had an individual who had needed an ada accommodation, that ada room is where that person would be housed. And the benefit of that is, is that in the two podz that we are talking about, these podz are slated to be what we called program pods. So we will be offering educational vocational and life skills and wrap around services in the pods and the benefit of having the ada room is that we dont preinclude anyone that needs the ada accommodation in the services that we offer. Okay, thank you. Thank you. Great, thank you. We will go to the Public Comment at this time. Thank you for your presentation. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, is there anyone that would like to speak on this item . All right, seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Matter is in our hands, what would you like to do supervisor tang . Thank you. I dont want to and i know that all of us probely received a lot of emails about not supporting this item and i think that we had a very thorough discussion several times around and i am not going to go into that and given that we are just providing information to the state i am going to make a motion to sent forth this resolution wit