For evaluating us in the broadcast thank you very much madam clerk, any announcements . Yes. All electronic devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the. Okay great you both are ready to present on this item and Shelly Campbell take that away. Good afternoon. Im shelly the public works personnel were here for the jurisdiction challenge from the point of privilege the item before you is virtually for the public works Sewer System Improvement Program the Sewer System Improvement Program is a 20 Million Investment required to renovate, upgrade our aging infrastructure to insure reliable and seismically sewer system for generations to come france is 70 projects 2 plus billion dollars is alter southeast plant which started out 70 years ago property jurisdictional challenge was initiate to enable the sfpuc to identify the space for the facilities at the southeast plant that is a challenge of the San Francisco public works napoleon yard shown here located at the evans and napoleon in the plant on jerold avenue the challenge will benefit both departments with Additional Space adjacent to the facilities in the bayview the napoleon yard is adjacent to public works central yard at the Caesar Chavez the Asphalt Plant is adjacent to the that motion carries southeast plant both properties are just under one and a half aches the departments are accepting in the as is condition with that, im going to turn it over to sue black and claudia is here to answer any questions you may have. Good afternoon, supervisors im sue black sunday night inform 9 director of proclamations want to let you know weve worked with the public works in this cleaver and supportive of it we store about one and 20 evacuees Rolling Stock and current Asphalt Plant and with the acreage were getting adjacent to our operations well be able to move that equipment to the yard so wanted to let you know were very much in support of effort. With that, claudia what you like to. No a quick question so given the proximity to the wastewater facility is that dpw. No public works. Sure let me direct this to the puc i understand the puc buildings the property will compliment the Capital Improvement for the Wastewater Treatment plant how is that a compliment. Were in dire need of the projects going on at southeast plant this site is also under consideration for the future Digester Program if it is active proposed site will be a shop site north of the Asphalt Plant if you look at the diagram the asphalt is south of cesar chavez is located. Uhhuh. So this is just a compliment in terms of staging location. What happens once the reimpelled is complete what happens to the asset. It will be part of digester facility so in what way. It is constructed. Will there be a building or public arts. The Digester Program i might have karen address our questions. Sure. Consist of a number of buildings and plazas over the site about 7 acres total. Ill call karen up good to see you. I was hoepd hoping to stay seated im karen and actually of the Asphalt Plant was a improvements have been completed and southeast that holds the Energy Recovery facility with converting that to power to help the plants to reduce their a cogent plant. Ill take a motion on this item. Ill move that we i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. And acknowledge that my scheme together with Ed Harrington to make our Asphalt Plant profitable we should had had jurisdictional i make a motion to send it to the full board with a positive recommendation. Supervisor peskin im sure that was your plan b. We didnt figure that out out at the time but the digesters is entirely different a decade ago. Im excited to see that moving forward and it is incredible and both about time and eager to get this underway. Without objection that passed unanimously madam clerk. 2 to amend the zoning map for the height and bulk for 1493 toe 97 and mac appropriate finding. Okay. Thank you aaron starr. Aaron starr, manager, legislative affairs. Enough time a health reclarifies for 1493 to open space or o s to 55 x im sorry to 40 x the rezoning was submit on behalf of the Property Owner the original require was 55 x, however, the commission reclarifies the height and bulk to 40 x referred in the ordinance before you the up to the time is located at the northeast intersection of potrero and schaefz e Caesar Chavez next to roadways with the showcasing plan it is currently development with a first story conducted in 1963 they found the commission confirmed the ooeshgz zones the specific property from m1 to 40 x to mixed use open space the Commission Found the the subject property that was enadvertently rezoned as part of reigning as the o s designation for parks and open space and not intended for privately held property and consistent to have a mixed use and change the height and bulk to open space. The Commission Voted to recommend approval because the Commission Found the proposed ordinances allows the error in the zoning map to be corrected, however, the Commission Found a health is not wandered this was zoned 40 x and zoned 40 x or for open space in addition the adjacent to the park they recommend against a 50 x designation ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. It cant be zoned private p you said that. In theory could a, normally do that. And theres no pending development. Nothing on file. Okay. Thank you colleagues if in questions to Public Comment open for item number 2 please come on. James counsel to the Property Owner just want to clarify this is just a correction of a clerical area from 40 to open space and wanted to correct the map thank you. Thank you and also for the record the Planning Commission has approved this ordinance. The Planning Commission vote to recommend approval with modifications seeing none, no other will Public Comments Public Comment is closed. Colleagues colleagues a motion to approve. Okay. That was backwards madam clerk call 3 and 4 together. Yes. Item number 3 and 4 ordinances for the Planning Department zoning map and general plan to rise the height of the downtown plan and creates the 9 street special use district and the findings. Thank you supervisor kim is the author of this item and i was under the impression. You said three and four; right . I said three and four so supervisor kim the author of 3 when they arrives well invite her up and go ahead and skip to the planning presentation thank you. Give up emery Rogers Department staff actions are the general plan and planning code amendments for 1270 Mission Street in the soma between 8 and 9 street the planning amendment was sponsored by supervisor kim and supervisor peskin for the 19th street special use district will accomplish 3 things first increase the onsite forcible from 13 plus to 21 plus percent those affordable units will be available for 55 percent, 4 percent at 70 ami first of all, that suv will wave the floor areas and exempting the project spons sponsor, third open space required be provided offsite and the general plan will rise the downtown plan consistent with the proposed height changes to date staff has received a number of letters from Business Owners and organizations in the violated on october 26th of this year the planning Commission Voted to remedy the approval of both amendments and your consideration the Planning Commission asked you to consider increasing the amount even if onsite affordable units to 25 percent with the additional 3 percent available for others not exploding the ami that concludes my presentation. Im available to answer any questions. Anyone questions for items three and four excuse me im told that supervisor kim is coming down the hallway so well wait. Welcome supervisor kim. We just wrapped up a very brief introduction from the Planning Department and just wanted to give you an opportunity to give some remarks on item 3 as well as item 4 thank you. Thank you, colleagues first hearing this item and thank you for also hearing this on november 14th that was continued with the does that amendment im pleased to sponsor the special use district a collaborative process over the last two years between our neighborhood and Community Members and our project sponsor that helped to determine an outcome that put together the desires and comments of all the shareholders and one part very little involvement from our office thank you to the project sponsor coming up with a project that everyone can support the proposed rezoning is supported by the Planning Department as appropriate for the affordable units at ami levels creating a dial that this broad talked about as a policy to serve moderate and middleincome it is supported buyouts the local calpers and the municipal employees as talked about two weeks ago the project sponsor has two years of meeting with the neighborhood and city staff and determined the solution that increases the affordable crayons a range of incomes and increasing of the base zoning of 13. 5 percent of the belowmarket rate at the 5 percent of average area medium income which is equals a total of 26 united for one and 95 unit building a proposed zoning permitting 200 and 89 did unit 20 percent are belowmarket rate to 13 percent of 55 ami and 4 percent anothers 90 percent and 3 and a half at 50 percent of average ami totally 75 bmr unit triple the based zoning and support from the filipinoamerican foundation the united playaz, the San Francisco hawks collaboration and central markets and the building and trades council and better lines four district 6 and the poter hotel no opposition during the ceqa process and it Services Without protests colleagues thank you for your consideration i do make one amendment on page 21 line 25 which at the same hearing as a technical grammatical amendment so thank you and thank again to the project sponsor. I will move that technical amendment. All right. Move that take Public Comment and move the technical amendment and move forward all right. Ladies and gentlemen, items three and four have been called together would you like to testify and share Public Comment . Thank you, supervisors thank you for the time eric my yes a collaborative effort throughout the process i want to thank the community and thank you to city staff and the st. Josephs for coming up with a solution that works well, that the community and supports the return and investment principles of California Public employees system this city what Work Together and produce communitybased outcomes that is supportive of it all im here to answer any questions you may have. Thank you, mr. Childs anyone else. Okay Public Comment is closed. All right. Supervisor peskin do you have that the technical amendment. The technical amendment to supervisor kim or would you like to read that. It is on page one at line 25 we are im all im asking is to delete at the same hearing. At the same hearing. All right. Okay thats the only amendment so i did not make copies of that my apologizes. Not a problem ill move that. Without objection. Unanimously passes. All right. Adopted now what about the entire body mr. Peskin. Ill move to send the items with the amendment to the full board with a positive recommendation. All right. Without objection that that motion carries unanimously madam clerk please call item 5. Item number 5 age ordinance for the planning code for the citywide transportation that requires the Development Projects to creating a administrative fee. Get to the meat of why were here today item 5 supervisor avalos thank you for joining us this afternoon hes the author of this item and will be making a short presentation followed by Planning Department staff and the Planning Department staff will go through the tdm. The floor is yours. Thank you very much chair cohen we have before us the ordinance that will establish the transportation to demand management part of Sustainability Program part 3 of that and it is part a new way how to build our buildings in San Francisco that align with the new version how we measure the cars and San Francisco going from towards vehicle miles traveled from level of service were looking how to shift places where people live and work from how they view transportation towards transit walking and cyclist and Public Transportation this is a huge effort that has been going on for many years that planning is involved in and geared towards having Better Health outcomes for how we do construction to increase the quality of our air and healthy lifetimes by lowering the amount of miles that vehicles travel that lowers the emissions that has the greatest impact towards climatic change that measure i believe will take more than todays hearing to snuff out i expect im introducing a series of hearing it will happen i dont believe what ive heard from colleagues and from others departments that were not going to be able to pass this measure enemy after im out of office i believe this concept that is here before us today is a sound one but i dont believe im familiar with it towards the passage this year im saying this at the beginning of any talking points this is the temperature if colleagues today is our first chance to get into the legislative process with the discussion of transportation to demand management that will be heavy on presentation from sfmta and the transportation and planning to talk about where we at and how we get this measure and people from the public that might have additions or amendments to make as legislation i have amendments id like to make and have ready here today that i have ask the committee to accept after Public Comment but essentially recognizing there are differences between projects that are in the health and Human Services and for projects that should have a different kind of consideration in terms of so moved. So many projects dont have a highlevel of vehicle usage attached to them especially residential we need new ones in the approach especially, when it comes to nonprofits there are nonprofits that Human Services that feel heavy transportation is part of a model to provide services or priority Transportation Services i think that is worthy ever consideration in terms of how we craft legislation Going Forward so ill be introducing those amendments towards finding and addressing those issues to help the Human Services and nonprofits and in no others members of the committee that wants to talk well go to presentations from our different departments and first of all, sfmta broefrdz welcome. Im thrilled sheryl vice chair of the brokering and glad to be here were fortunate to live in a growing city San Francisco will audio one and 90 thousand jobs and one hundred homes to keep obvious moving the city is adding to address the future Transportation Needs we need to do one big thing development to their pay your fair share and this will help our new citizens not all trips need to be made by car the focus to support new residents and tenants and making sure nondriving modes and giving folks choices that ordinance is initiative that is imperative and timely doucht it copes our air clean and our neighborhoods liveable by having people provide Transportation Options that is data driven and informed by the best practices it will be flexible that will be responsive it has a commitment to monitoring the outcomes and transparent in the way weve not seen in allowing the citizens to see what is going on with development were hearing if other cities their looking to this ordinance as a model of the comprehensive effective approach from transportation to demand management this is our opportunity to once again be a model city for the rest felt nation and a laboratory for new ideas people wants options in increasing numbers of transit on for the and beautifies this will obstinately options for benefits not only the local neighborhood by the city as a whole and possible to grow smartly this is the time to make it and thank you. I look forward to this ordinance moving forward. Thank you. Thank you director brinkman. Good afternoon emery rogers Planning