And member supervisor chan. Our clerk is mr. Victor young. Do you have any announcements . Yes the board of Supervisors Committee are convening hybrid meeting still prosecute voiding Remote Access and Public Comment via phone. Will be taking the Public Comment as followed first comment taken on each item on the agenda. Those in person allowed to speak first then those on the phone line. Those watching channel 26, 28, 78 or 99 and sfgov. Org the public call in number is streaming. The number is 4156550001. The meeting id access code 2492 770 5750. When connected you will hear the meeting discussion but will be muted and in listening mode only. When your item of interest come up and Public Comment is called those in person lineup to peek and those on the phone should dial story 3 to be added to the line. If you arol phone remember to turn down your television and all listening devices. As indicated, we will take Public Comment in person first and then go to the comment phone line. You may submit Public Comment in writing e mail them to myself the clerk at victor. Young sfgov. Org. If you can submit it by e mill tell be forwarded to the proirzs and include as part of the file. Send the comments u. S. Mail to city hall. Thank you. Call the first item. First is item 1. Ordinance approving Surveillance Technology policies body come ras by rec and park security by the deputy elections and the airport and finaling in support of said approvals. Thank you, mr. Young. This is the third time this item appeared before this committee. There are a few nonsubstantive changes that i put before you putting in the correct file number and filling out terms. Im happy to go through them most low it is put nothing file 221043 in numerous places throughout the ordinance. I will reminds folks that the provision with regard to the location managementment system of the rec and Parks Department has been stricken. And is not part of this approved policy. And with that, is there Public Comment on this item . Yes, members who would like to speak on this matter can lineup to speak at this time. For those remote call 4156550001. Upon upon enter access code 2492 770 5750. Once connected you will need to press story 3 to enter the speaker line for those in the queue wait until the system indicates you are unmute then begin your comment. Can we have our first caller in the room . Come forward. You have 2 minutes for Public Comment. Thank you, yes. Im [inaudible] and i would like to say im [inaudible] yea, on surveillance i would understand why it would be needed terror the lessons upon given the scene because of the laws of fraud. So that ponent that having said on the 2020 election. So but um i would really oppose it in parks and rec and other public venue because we are going inclusion a police day for everything surveillance and im protecting and defending Constitutional Rights i heard on the news yesterday that no action can be taken against those people that were in voting places. They were armed and threatening [inaudible]. Said than i have a right [inaudible] i [inaudible] i cant believe they have nothing can be done [inaudible] they have a lot to [inaudible] speech and the press. So i support that but i would like to say that we have enough surveillance i dont want to go to parks and see the come are watching my every move. It does not sound right e approximately you go to public performs. Thank you thank you. There are other member who is would like to testify on item one . Yes we have a caller on the line. Can we have our first caller. Can you hear me okay. Proceed. Great. David, i wanted to speak in support of the ordinance. Appreciate the technical review and edits proposed by chair peskin. And i think these 3 use makes sense and have been fair low scrutinized and appreciate the work of the various departments and Jillian Johnson of [inaudible]. Thank you for listening. Thank you. That was our last caller on the phone line for this matter. Admissible comment is closed. I will make a motion to adopt the amendments technical and nonsubstantive on that motion a roll call. On the motion to adopt the amendments, supervisor chan. Aye. Vice chair mandelman. Aye. Chair peskin. Aye. The motion passes without objection. Gi will make a motion to sends it as amended with recommendation to the full board of supervisors. On that motion a roll call. On that motion, supervisor chan. Aye. Vice chair mandelman. Aye. Chair peskin. Aye. The motion passes without objection. Next item. Next on the agenda is item twoshg ordinance amending the code to require board of supervisors approval of a policy governing the funding acquisition and use of certain Law Enforcement equipment consistent with the criteria in state law and approves the Police Departments use of equipment policy. Colleagues, we have heard this on 4 occasions in the intervening week. The Police Department made some signatured changes to the changes i suggested at the last meeting. But they are they are still as of the last time communicated with them contemplating additional changes waiting on the chief who was otherwise busy with the pelosi matter to opine on their comments. I will make their comments to me a part of the record. For next week. I believe that there are Police Department representatives available if you have any questions. They will be the back and forth will be in next weeks board packet. Is there anybody here from the department withhold like to add or subtract or otherwise comment . I believe supervisor chan . Supervisor chan. My thank you. I did have the amendments from last week. That i dont know if i need to again read my amendments to the legislation or we can you can i mean the legislation itself this is a bit like 19 b. Which is in order to have changes to the policy we would do that by ordinance. The changes that you suggested were a part of the comments that i read in the policy itself. So they, and i believe by the way, and i will hundred this to you i believe that the department did accept those changes. Yes. You dont need to read them they will be ultimate low incorporate in the the policy if the board of supervisors cease fit to do so. This supervisor certainly does. Thank you. Is there anybody from the Police Department who would like to say anything . All right. If not, are there members of the public hold like to testify on item 2 . Yes, members wish to speak on this item can line up to peek. Listening remote call 4156550001 then access code 2492 770 5750. Once connected you need to press story 3 to enter the line. Those in the queue continue to wait until the system indicated you have been unmuted then begin your comments can we have our first commenter . In the room . Yes. I oppose that legislation. We dont need tanks, machine guns im opposed to guns. I remember we was going to go [inaudible] [inaudible] that was [inaudible]. He did not understand english i told him to drop the weapon he had a machine gun this would [inaudible]. 2016. Its like why having tanks and machine guns . You know. [inaudible] like jackson, mississippi the african and white students were [inaudible] i dont see why people are not up in arms. [inaudible] that is so wrong machine gun and tanks for a police encounter. It is ridiculous. Thank you. Moving to the phone callers. Can we have our first caller. Good morning chair and supervisor this is policy is missing reporter s of state law and vital to Community Safety produced for our [inaudible]. We ask you incorporate the amendments to fully define authorized use for all weapons that a date compatible with the 23 24 budget process for receiving the [inaudible]. And direct sfpd require full transparency. Police department require military grade equipment are like low to use violence and military equipment is deployed in black and brown communities the risk and impacts of sfpd militarization will be responsiblesed acute low in marginalized communities. There are desparity in policing in San Francisco and a report found San Francisco the worse in the state with police [inaudible] rates for black residents. Military equipment is a multiplier and have consequences for further exacerbating San Franciscos desparities. Based on the [inaudible] by commune members and clients impacted by the generational harm caused. Should be aggressive in our prop to oversight had policy does in the safe guard the publics welfare, safety, rights or civil learnt this is is a requirement of ab41. Ordinance must be resunriseed pesifiy what uses are authorized for each weapon and a report with the budget process and require transparency in equipment restocking. Please incorporate come community concerns. Thank you. And before the next speaker. The last speaker referred to the community version. Im not if that exists i gotten Public Comment letters with various suggestions this are in the file and im reviewing the file. But in the sure hacommunity version this speaker from glide is referring to. Anyway. If somebody has this and wants to make it a part of the file i encourage them to do so. Thank you. Next caller, please. Good morning. Supervisors tess welbourn. I support that the peeshg from glide said. And im horrifyd that this equipment in the hands of sfpd in view of the many heinous acts they have already performd and could perform in the future. I personal low would recommend this the equipment donated to the National Guard or the equal. Thank you. I endorse comments from glide. I sent you 3e mails with comments similar to what glide said the last few months. I will in the repeat that but we need an ordinance that defines authorized use clearly. So the opinion knows that the allowed uses, endorse plan to the budget process. That is the account at tool the board of supervisors has. And will give the public an opportunity to see that you are looking and viewing the uses to see if they are Still Necessary and meet the Public Safety and guideline in the state ordinance. I would like to request had the Police Department submits their comments they get posted early enough appears this will be continued until 2 weeks from now . I believe the election is next tuesday. May not be meeting on this day. Thank you very much. That was our last caller. Public comment for this item is closed. And i the make a motion to condition this item to the meeting next monday. On that motion, a roll call, please. On the motion to continue the matter supervisor chan. Aye. Vice chair mandelman. Aye. Chair peskin. Aye. That matter is continued. Next item. Please. Next on the agenda is item 3. Motion reissue pointing supervisor mandelman term ending december first of 23 to the California State Assembly of counties. Would you like to make a motion. So moved. Motion to recuse supervisor mandelman. On that motion, supervisor chan. Aye. Chair peskin. Aye. Motion passes without objection. With mandelman being excuse friday that motion. Is there Public Comment on the motion to reappoint supervisor mandelman to the California State Association of counties . Members who wish to speak in person should line up at this time. For those remote call 4156550001 then access code 2492 770 5750. Once connected press story 3 to enter the queue. For those in the queue continue to wait until you have been unmuted then begin your comment. Anyone in the room withhold like to comment on this merit . Seeing none. We have one person on the line for Public Comment. Proceed, please. We lost that person. So we dont have callers on the line. Opinion comment is closed i make a motion to sends this to the full board with positive recommendation on that a roll call, please. On that motion supervisor chan. Aye. Vice chair mandelman is excused. Chair peskin. Aye. The motion passes without objection with vice chair mandelman excuse friday this matter. Next item. Next on the agenda is item 4 motion to director the clerk to initiate request for proposal process to facilitate a working group to explore ownership or resident control at Mid Town Park apartment in the western edition. Supervisor preston, i look forward to being regaled with the charter conundrum this motion is facing. Thank you, chair peskin and i will do my best and appreciate you calendaring this and allowing to condition with the City Attorney and if okay with the chair i do need to go in background on this one. I have been thinking about this all weekend. Right. So colleagues the item buffer occurrence Mid Town Park apartments Affordable House nothing the western edition and i want to say that ma in many ways mid town is a moral test for the city how we support the residents puts to the test our citys commitment to racial equity, housing stability and reparations to the black community. Mid town is city owned. The only such property in the city. True Municipal Housing right now existing in the heart of the fillmore. The only impedament to a resident lead future of mid town is the city itself. Many of you may be familiar with the situation at mid town in 2020, this board voted approving an ordinance to provide rent stabilization to the longterm legacy tenants at mid town. Some of whom received had we viewed as very unfair rent increases. That important step to redress rent increases that were as high as 300 . Was always viewed by my office and by the residence denials in mid town as a step on a longterm path. Motion before the committee is intended to commence the next step and to monopoly out longterm vision for mid town. One in which residents voices are centered this step is a long time coming. Mid town existence owes itself to an explicit emission by the city the redevelopment era saw the mass displacement of the black community was a tremendous mistake. The 138 unit complex mid town was created to house western edition residents had lost homes during the shameful chapter in San Francisco history. It was created by the city giving the property to private Developer Barton western and according to historic documents the company advertised the units with the slogan own your own. Promoting which tenants have Equity Ownership in a coprittive. As reported on, including reports by reporter natalie. That promise was taken away by the private develop exert settle in the court and colleagues i could go in the long twisted saga that is the story of mid town in the intervocabularying years the transfer of ownership to hud. Eventual low to the city. The ever changing Property Management companies and series of broken promises to they residents. Equally is the resilience and dedication to community the residence have shown. I will fast forward not to present i will fast forward it june fifth, 2007 a crucial moment in relation this to boards activities approve a resolution to guide the city and Mid Town Park residents in formulating a longterm Ownership Structure and development plan. And again that was in 2007. The resolution detailed 5 principles realize longterm ownership. Name low prevenning displacement involving tenants and protecting affordability and exploring alternative Ownership Structures and faith, sanitary and decent housing. Where as clause noted that quote, mo is committed to working with the tenants to complete the planning transfer of ownership and rehab of mid town p apartments. 15 years later, 15 years later, it is clear no progress has been made by the Mayors Office of housing to achieve this. This past budget cycle my office allocated limited funds to jump start this process. We invested district add back dollars with the purpose of retaining Community Housing consultant to have a conversation among mid town residents how to best achieve the long promised goal of resident control or ownership with residents voices the center of the discussion. Funds pay for expert to lead a conversation among residence denials what Affordable Housing model, Ownership Structure, best suits their vision and needs this information can be used to inform the board of supervisors about our next steps with regard to mid town. One can make the case the funds allocated to majors office of housing. That department shown it is unable or unwilling to perform this work. They were urgeed do so 15 years ago by the board and taken no steps to see this to fruition. Unfortunately this is not an isolated situation and previous add backs from my office the Mayors Office and Community Development has been unable or unwilling to implement funds for their purpose. Last years budget we put tw00 thousand dollars toward Public Housing organizers, funds aimed helping residents in public and subsidized housing add vo indicated for repairs and dignified conscience for months after the budget was approved offered excuses to why they were not moving the funds forward. Finally, we introduced legislation to represent the funds to a different department. Eve of a Committee Hearing on that motion. On that ordinance that informed us agree to move the funds elsewhere. I take no pleasure in recite thanksgiv