Adoption a single roll call vote if a member objects an item can be roved. Before we vote can we have a motion to excuse xhooishgs moved and supervisor tang and supervisor farrell colleagues well take that without objection. Supervisor christensen is excused and madam clerk on items 28 through thirty call roll. Supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed. Supervisor campos supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor tang supervisor wiener there are 10 is. Those motions are approved unanimously madam clerk can we go to the in memoriams and yes. Todays meeting will be adjourned by the beloved individuals at the suggestion of supervisor cohen for the late ms. Regive madam clerk, any other business before this committee . Theres no further business. Okay. Thank you ladies and gentlemen, were adjourned and please remember to vote today for election now th meeting of the Community Investment and infrastructure the Successor Agency to the San FranciscoRedevelopment Agency for tuesday, november 3, 2015, welcome to members of the public madam secretary first item. Thank you, madam chair the the first order of business is item one roll call commissioners, please respond when i call your name. Commissioner mondejar commissioner pen commissioner singh commissioner bustos madam chair rosales all members the commission are present. The the next order of business is item 2 announcements a the next our next regularly scheduled meeting will be held at one p. M. City hall room 4 to 56 b announcements of prosecution of sound producing Electronic Devices please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones, and use of cell phones, Electronic Devices are prohibited at this meeting. Please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room of any person s responsible for the ringing or use of a c announcement of time allotment for Public Comment please be advised a member of the public has up to 3 minutes to address the commission unless the commission the Commission Adopts a shorter period on any item. It is strongly recommended that any member of the public wishes to address the commission fill out a speaker card and submit it to the commission secretary. The the next order of business is item 3 respect on action taken at a previously closed session meeting if any there are no reportable actions the food and beverages is item 4 matters of Unfinished Business no matters of urban finished business the the next order of business is item 5 matters of xhvtd of consent and regular agenda first, the Consent Agenda none the the next order of business is the regular agenda items 5 a, 5 b, 5 c are 5 d and 5 e related to the golden gate Warriors Center and mixed use on blocks 34 and 32 will be heard together and acted on separately 5 a certifying the Environmental Impact report for the golden gate warriors and mixed use extremity on blocks 29 through 32 in mission bay under the California Environmental quality act ceqa and the ceqa Guidelines Mission bay south redevelopment discussion and action resolution number 692015. 5 b adopting eir finding in the California Environmental quality act ceqa and the ceqa guidelines including the adoption of a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and in a statement of overriding consideration in connection with the development of time golden gate Warriors Event Center and mixed use development at micro i mission bay blocks Mission Bay SouthRedevelopment Area discussion and action resolution number 702015 5 c approving the amendment 209s development in connection with the golden gate Warriors Event Center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in Mission Bay South reDevelopment Project area discussion and action resolution number 712015. 5 d conditionally approving the basic concept seismic design for the golden gate Warriors Center and mixed use development on blocks 29 through 32 in Mission Bay South with the agreement with fossil fuel, llc Mission Bay South reDevelopment Project area discussion and action resolution number 722015. And 5 e informational presentation on the executive directors determination regarding uses as allowed secondary land use pursuant to the land bay with the golden gate Warriors Center and mixed use on blocks 29 in mission bay setting the reDevelopment Project area discussion maam, executive director. Thank you, madam secretary good morning to the commissioners and the members of the public thank you for joining us commissioners over the course of the last year youve held informational presentations on the proposed project number of actions for our consideration and action today we will have executive director sally walk through the proposed action and the informational presentation shell be joined by representatives of the project sponsor and the project Consultant Team with thatwith that thank you director bohe and good morning, commissioners im sally Deputy Director tiffany might have given me a promotion laughter here to present a number of items related to the event center on blocks 29 through 32 in Mission Bay South that the golden gate warriors radio proposing id like to go over the agenda is follows i will highlight the various actions before the commission and walk you through through the project site and description go into detail on the sub e subsequent eir action and the ceqa finding youre being asked to adapt i do you want some refinements subsequent eir will walk you through a number of transportation related refinements then ill invite the project sponsor to present their project and walk you through the diabetes as well and there are a number of other actions before us as well well go into the second half talk about the designs for the Development Amendments were recommending and provided you information regarding the executive director secondary eye determination and highlight the various contracting goals and our Small Business before his goals for the project describe 9 Public Outreach undertaken and walk through the next steps. So the actions before you are in 4 separate resolution search warrants the final eir adopting the ceqa finding for the findings themselves along with the mitigation monitoring and reporting program or the m m rp in resolution 70 dash 2015 and amending the mission bay setting in the resolution and conditionally the combined seismic design in resolution 72 dash 2015. So the project as i mentioned is located on blocks 29 through 32 in Mission Bay SouthHidden Valley high school in blue an 11 acre site ever vacant proposals and the golden gate warriors have completed the resolution to the site in october heres the site plan showing this 19 thousand plus seat Purchase Center it is approximately 5 hundred and 13 leasable square feet in approximately 55 thousand square feet of retail and 13 loading docks and one hundred 32 parking at the garage and it includes open space for the project. Id like to note that the site plan as you can see a gate house element sort of between the two towers includes a variance not the gatehouse this is because about there is an easement that needs to be completed or agreement with usf for to agree not to have the opportunity gate im sorry to allow the gates house in that easement id like to correct a error in my staff memo that project was completed the project sponsor and usf has entered into an agreement nostril officially completed by you everybody is moving forward with the understanding the gatehouse it the preferred scenario. So moving forward into intro into the Environmental Review so well weve taken a number of steps with the colleagues in the City Planning Department to undertake this Environmental Review with a notice of preparation issued on november in 2014 and held a scoping meeting in november 2014 and the draft eir was published on john june 5th Public Comment was on june 5th and extended through july 27th for a total of 5 two days and then we published 0 robust to comment the responsive to all the comments received during the june 30th draft and the written comments received during the Public Comment period ending on july 27th in addition the responses to comments received after the close of Public Comment period including a letter from the alliance dated 2015 it is the u. S. Army cosponsorship recommendation and a few not addresses including a letter concerning the eir alternative analysis and other letter concerning the Hazardous Materials and finally two letters from the air quality zone for the measure in the eir and one from johnston temple ton regarding the environmental just the letters are in your packets and Copies Available for the public as well none the last minute comments chance the conclusions concerning the impacts on the environment. So the responses to the document is organized and filed cantonese a list of persons and organizations and public agencies that commented all the copies written responses to the comments a description of project rei am not sure few minutes a project variance a revision since the publication to comments an eradicate sheet was prepared to correct errors that was distributed to the commissioners and available for the public here those tax changes are not changing the conclusions in the eir two other changes want to note for you since we drafted the eradicate sheet one regarding the m m rp that references the transportation managed plan or the t mp rather it is provided an as exhibit in the appendix in 3 so it is not reprinted as a separate exhibit well strike the reference that has to the m m rp and id like to note in volume 5 in the response to comments in chapter 15 usf has requested we hang the words regarding the mp r9 p about the event lighting plan and in the 5 bullet like us to change the language it describes the light configuration similar to those associated with the uchlgs helicopter pad we had language and doable e feasible with the outdoor lighting space so remove the as feasible well strike that out. As noted before the Public Comment period has closed on the eir and the action to consider certifying the f d i r the commission has considered the adequacy and accuracy of the final eir the certification has been considered by the commission the certify was in compliance with ceqa and red lights the judgment and analysis and has a ceqa for the monitoring and reporting program. The second fbtdz that the commission is asked to adopt a Product Description of the Environmental Impact report of the product and in consideration of approval the project and recreation of alternatives a statement of offering riding consideration providing reasons for the Commission Action and rejection of response in the in the project the m m rp is the timing for implementing and timing of mitigation measures the eir will enter into an agreement if necessary with other departments to act as at designee. So, now id like to note that the variance project refinements included in the response to comment document again none chain 9 eir those for the onsite generates to reduce the wind hazard judges and the clean plan and construction related to the those onsite soil treatment and the pump generators and refinements for transportation i now like to ask alex from the office of Economic Workforce Development to come up and present the transportation items to you. Thank you sally and good morning adam from the office of Economic Workforce Development pleased to walk you through some of the project as they relate to transportation we were last before you at our schematic workshop we presented a number of transportation improvements that are come to this neighborhood eir refreshment on the slide have not changs changed but on the citys on behalf of to a multi the transbay terminal and the landing for the water emergency at golden gate near the Ferry Building and the completion of street grid and others listed those are unchanged since the last session sitting on top of those improvements are a number of specific improvements for the arena this is our special Event Service buses center an is t third and coordination with the transit agencies but there is one difference as we started to refine our analysis as part of plan we identified the need for a potential centralize brtd mr. Chairman in the document and we released as part of drirt and those platforms are considered as a northbound and southbound separated platform an either side of the intersection that combines them with added capacity employee and post events were studying this as a project variance in the eir weve also had 18 months of conversation in the community with variance stakeholder in the residents to the rincon hill through mission bay and dog patch and the bayview and the eastern neighborhoods and the commercial interests from the biotech and mission bay and the usf Mission Bay Hospital and the giants Advocacy Organization and the Bicycle Coalition spur, etc. As a result weve added additional parking control officers it is difficult to see the stars on the map shows 3 categories parking control officers those we analyzed as part of draft eir and released in the june dwraft and added as a result of the analysis that was conducted as part of draft a few additional to create the local hospital assess plan a specific plan to allow patients doctors and staff of the hospital to get to their designation without the arraign attendees and directing them to 16th street and mariposa and protecting the streets in some of the interior circulation streets for local use and we will used parking control officers and signage to separate that traffic were invasively two parking lots to the south of the site as intercepts so cars driving i driving into the area has a please be advised the ringing of and use of cell phones, is to park away from the immediate venue so we dont have conflicts with bikes and others as shown before the positioning a week from tomorrow on november 10th to consider the preliminary steps to realize those one 200 and 50 lot at grade at 19th street and illinois that serves the park pier 70 development and dog patch and mission bay and the Events Center and the others further to the south cesar chavez strait called the western pacific site west of pier 80 t a gravel site for Consumer Price index supervisor tang of delivery vehicles from 9 Convention Event we can use for over flow under the duly sworn scenario a free shuttle from that location to the center. In terms of capital and operating costs for transportation serve the event center that are one time costs of 55 million in 2,014 were a comparing apples to apples across the all sources and uses that 55 million purchased light rail vehicles with the mta is in process of acquiring and listening the day have you as cross tracks on the t third line to make sure were not interrupting service further down line on the t third and signals and other in the ground infrastructure about 25 million in one time forces largely if the transportation and Action Development fee the project sponsor will be paying to offset those costs and 30 million delta we will be looking to finance with annual revenues generated by the event center. In terms of annual revenues we contracted with economic and Planning Systems and that Kaiser Permanente and marks and the agency to review r receive those the center net of the project and property tax increment that stays in the neighborhood for infrastructure and Affordable Housing will generate 14. 1 million per year once operational for the city general fund ill not go through the sources but the sources are listed here a portion of them are dedicated by the charter those will continue to go to their dedicated sources so if we break down that 14. 4 million 2. 9 goes to the forces and 6. 1 million is our estimate of operating cost it largely mta to pay for the parking control officers and those infrastructure bus drivers and inspectors and personnel and Rolling Stock to get people, too, and from the site and the estimated costs and two remaining funds one a dual event reserve that was an important thing to the community and the hospital to make sure under peak condition a lot of a