Disturb the meeting. If you want to speak during Public Comment you be called on or you have Public Comment cards. We do have more cards of front if you want to fill out and send it to our staff. I will call you when the appropriate item comes all. Then, finally we always get you think sfgov tv services for airing this meeting not to the pop. Thank you for everyone out there watching today. We will go ahead and start this meeting with a roll call. Hockhammer here, thomas, lamb, frost here. We have a quorum commissioner [inaudible] eddies on his way. I am here, to sorry. Commissioner tan here. Before we go on to item number one i do want to highlight that theres an item on our agenda there will be continued. That is item number seven. 500 a continuance on this that no one from how soon could make it tonight. Gina your own or any of the staff could be here. In addition to that of instructed our staff to [inaudible] police code 1060. 124 commissioners in her binder at the very back if you want to look at that. Essentially, there in that cody is that particular section is about noise abatement. It says if the committee feels within reasonable time and in no event more than 60 days after having been ordered to do so, pursuant to the article, to abate any noise this permit shall be suspended after second hearing due notice of which is given until such time as he complies with the order. So just to break that into more laymans terms, essentially what i said and what i asked our director to do is to let how soon oh they have 60 days from our last hearing not to provide us with their plans for how to abate the noise had to do some probing but essentially by my tradition of this code they have 60 days to make that actual improvements. So that squeezes their timeline down. I think they were giving us very unclear answers and have also, in the request for continuance, still given us unclear answers about how much time they need. So that is instruction was given to our staff. I would read pulling that item. We do intend on hearing the matter next Commission Meeting and so we will discuss that. Item number one is general Public Comments. This is where Public Comment on any items that pertains to the business of the San Francisco entertain come Entertainment Commission into seat currently agendize. Is there any Public Comment . I think theres two and i know you guys want to speak about a different item that we discontinued so i will give you a chance. Whoever wants to, first . It of 2 min. Hello. Commissioners. Its good to see you again. Earlier this afternoon 20 i learned the agenda item for hulsey on is being pushed to the next hearing on april 4. We were quite surprised by this as the commission seemed firm on their timeline the last hearing giving gina two weeks to come up with an initial plan to address the ongoing nose issues. The hearing on april 4 be the fourth hearing we will attend which is quite a burden on our time. So you feel its important to attendance we can be represented. Our introductions with inspector burke on this issue stretch back many months. We sincerely hope the commission will consider the stressful burden is been on her living situation for quite some time. We still not received a timeline for improvements and we are hoping that commission will pay some are structured somehow seconds after our permit until such a plan can be developed and set in motion. The past two weeks since the last hearing operation is continued as usual. It seems those two additional weeks of continued noise no plan timeline were agreement are stretching up to four weeks. Last week and was particularly bad. We requested the commission provide some way of ensuring hulsey on within the limits particularly, after hours. Inspector burke is not always available and almost never after 2 am. It seems theyre able to continue to operate however they please, especially after two and what happens is like nothing we can do about it which is very frustrating for us. We would love if there would be some type of enforcement plan particularly, as the process continues to drag out without improvements to the noise. Thank you. Thank you. Point of clarification. Goahead can i ask were you able to lodge a complaint to the venue . I sent inspector burke a complaint did you contact the venue itself . No. I contacted inspector burke. Thank you. Actually i may have included gina as well. Im not 100 positive. Maybe [inaudible]. Thank you. All right. [calling Public Comment cards] hello. Commissioners nice to see everyone on tonythe northeast rate just to remind you. Since the last hearing two weeks ago i stood up after 2 am on the weekends and we are still hearing sound leakage into our home from hulsey on. While the high frequencies have been improved, theres still a lot of base passing through into our bedrooms. I understand we are moving an agenda item to next agenda. The next hearing. But what kind of reprieve and residents have until theres a permanent solution . Given patient and cooperative with operators while they keep on getting her nonexisting, once pushed out what we continue to live with the entertainment sound coming into our homes. So until renovations are complete, or, theres a better longterm solution in place, the entertain commission do anything to help us until then . Thank you. Is there any other Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. [gavel] we will move on to our next item which is approval of Meeting Minutes from march 7. Commissioners, any would like to make a motion . I moved to approve. Is there a second . Second. Moved and seconded. Any edits or changes. Doesnt seem like there are any good any Public Comments on minutes . Lets go ahead and take a bow looks perez aye thomas aye bierman aye lee aye frost tremont kim aye the minutes pass item number three the report from executive director. We havent seen you in a couple meetings. Traveling the world i think i just missed one. Good evening commissioners. So ive a bunch of stuff. Hopefully i would take too long. To update you on the first one is that the addition of [inaudible] cchapter 116 legislation was at last read on february 28. So it seems the mayor has like 10 days to sign. Im pretty sure we are in the window of its done. Its a done deal and i do have a list of Hotel Projects that they were in the pipeline as we push this legislation for. So we should be seeing some of those projects shortly in whatever form we end up with in terms of comedy are we talking about . There was about 17 within 300 feet and they seem to bunch up around the same areas obviously. So we been doing some work in advance to two of the hotels are within proximity to be sky like very close proximity could so doing outreach even in advance of the lobbying finalize because its time to do that. So anyway, thats where that is. Expect some of that. I wanted to update you. We do have been wondering whether or not the disclosure piece of chapter 115 is functioning and we set up this database online so that we couldpeople could easily go on there and put her affidavit in and indicate they are disclosing. But we went back to planning and relearned that literally from project nine of the projects we reviewed our candidate yet. Theres been like, build and not even ground broken. So were not missing anything i just had a nightmare we were missing our opportunity for disclosure but we have not done that. We are staying on top of that with the first one gets people in it better be a good day and we will let you know. Are they supposed to summit the disclosure to us . To you speak with the affidavits get committed to the city Entertainment Commission office via a Online System is waiting to be utilized. Then it will be like a backend that we can look up and use when someone calls and says i can hear something and then we can refer them to the disclosure of an obviously do what we do which is try to abate the noise. Okay. I went again to what i think might be the Fourth Meeting of the dbi warehouse working group. I dont know if heard about this previously because i know [inaudible] i been to meetings. The permit of building inspection after the goshen fire put together a working group about the compliance agencies to work towards pushing forward implementation of the citywide policy to not make people homeless and keep artists in working and Living Spaces can we finally today got to appoint a discussion of Assembly Phases because previously, its all been about residential issues. While im glad we were invited, we dont with people Living Spaces. So it was a little bit tangential until today where they agenda is the Entertainment Commission and the arts commission, to do presentation on who we are, what we do because frankie, as much as we work with all these other ages, we work with very small slivers of people that run them and the bounds of those ages dont have any energy with the entertain commission does or how it affects their work. So i did a basic introduction and we sort of went forward to expire and how are onetime event permit works is that i think is really the issue. Then, indicate how we get notified of one off events that might be illegal or underground as well as certain repetitive addresses that tend to panic crop up and go away and crop up again. The outcome of the task force is yet to be seen. I mean i think its good to be bunch of recommendations. Some of which are related to the illegal assembly, but i will keep you informed because i think its going to be, to be honest from our side mostly just information sharing. I think the Biggest Issue with all the departments that we keep our own info a little silo and i can update theirs and they can update mine. So it might be in the end of the day some sort of it work to find a way to sort of put it out there for everyone time event permit at this address is activated for every weekend. Like, it will be out there. Anyway, thats whats going on. There is work and i think the Bigger Picture is that the city in general is committed to making pathways towards compliance. The not interested in coming down too hard on spaces unless theyre patently unsafe. This ruling away to make it work without millions of dollars. So this package i gave you with a memo on top, does everyone see that . Its a little deceiving good i stabled it because i didnt want all these pages to fly round but really, it is a review. A try to go this through fairly quickly. I did a memo also of the [inaudible] since we have not had a meeting in 2017 at all, there were a decent number of projects that needed to move forward based on their hearing date at planning. So theyre all different and the kind of constructive and president and i have had a discussion about how were going to move forward as a commission intelligent review of new projects coming for. We may coming back, depending on the conversation you have been always projects to the full commission instead of you, that use the Committee Structure because the number projects slowdown from a much more manageable but in the meantime, i thought i would update you on how these things played out. The first one is 565 howard. When i wrote this memo it was like amazed at the size of these buildings is astounding in some cases, its 380 feet tall, 36 tory mixed use highrise tower with 69 residential units and 255 hotel rooms. Its a big project in particularly, we would want to hear big project like that but again we can mitigation from the planner the project sponsor may that hearing really hard so the project sponsor and i went back and forth quite a bit and he was able to outreach to the in particular, te i club which very very heav dutyy latenight active poa and have them also update their sound study to include sound reading taking performance. I did catch that. That is the first couple of pages if youre interested. Because it didnt obviously take that into account [inaudible] know weve done this on a regular basement so we had to go back into that. The outcome getting change the rate of materials. So, the standard recommendations were sent to planning. We asked that the project sponsor continue to outreach to the poe and keep us informed of the proper progress because it is a very very large large project. The next one, and again, i didntevery one of these does not have [inaudible] a lease as a project sponsor form so you have a good idea what its about. The 34 9020 street project, again user like a late add and it somewhat small. Probably would not have been reviewed at hearing anyway. Their plan is to change occupancy of the top two floors making for offices into four residential units and adding a roof deck. The reason it obviously came to us as bit proximity to bring those. Who knows for a long time was just a restaurant with the poe they do not actively use and i think windows is pretty much turned into a like a weekend only nightclub use for better or worse. So it was important that obviously our offices try housing being reviewed. So the fact that this is so small, it didnt trigger environmental which we know we see quite a bit in these large projects. That being the case, there wasnt a sound subject given there was no sound study and no way for them to be enforced to do one, i sent a sound inspected to do a sound study to do a sound study on the fly. So he went out there and i asked the project sponsor to meet him out there is probably [inaudible] he stayed from 11 ammidnight as i recall that i included johns note, i think i did some work. Maybe i didnt did i dont know. They are a. Okay. To basically do two things. One, obviously, get a read on how the current construction of the building week sound or not and also, have the project sponsor be there at 11 pm and i get hes intending to make something of an office into residential without ever having been there that late energy so made him do both things at the same time. The conclusions indicate a minimal sum is audible [inaudible] and the design of this newer of graded building standards is going toit can only improve the soundproofing and so again what i did was just sent him a recommendation to the Planning Department. I thought that was a good waya good use of our resource. I hope you do, too. Can i interrupt . Ferber knows when you are out there were their doors wide open or how was that . I actually walked by last week and or the weekend before and there were us thumping. In my experience, what that evening particular i was more focused on any sound escaping from the roof. So thethere is a direct line of sight from current units on the north side of that building. It overlooks some skylights. I went to the roof could we went into a couple of units and it was very minimal sound that was leaking into the units themselves. I took a quick measurement of sound coming up out of the roof. I didnt notice at the time any sound was coming up from street level. So as far as i know, i think we may not have to worry about the doors. I have not noticed, and most recent patrols, i just took over the mission that the doors have not been an issue. I will definitely yes. Just some kind of light enforcement of that but yes, its not [inaudible] asking him to triple pane windows that is totally fine. Thank you. Thank you. Okay. I guess the things are not really in order. Sorry. The next one i have in this is 1228. Which is a project with 24 new residential units and groundfloor lower commercial split into two separate buildings on fulsome and clementina. They are near the cat club and [inaudible] also very active spots, both i think our end at 2 am. So project sponsor met with the operators. They did outreach to bars and they alsoto those operators as well as bars. So what i am aiming at theres a across the street that does have a poe but im costly pushing these guys to do our reach even if it has eight [inaudible] or doesnt have anything with us. Still if it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck so they actually did that which was pretty happy about. They submitted their sound study which already accounted for night life could anyone anyone uses Charles Salter as their consultant theyre going to get that now as a matter of course which is really i think a good thing. Something that we should all be proud of. So, yes recommendations sent. This indirect renditions were their quest the project sponsor account for the lack ofso the cat club in particular, pointed out that they did not do that highrating hoist a microphone will be high up. This project is going to go fairly high up above those two places of entertainment. Again, we do not have time with the timing of these projects to push them before they go to planning but we did request andi constantly do that get him and his son these recognitions and put a note in here to the planner that this is the extra things we want. Why not . Whats the worst thats when to happen . So ive not received information that i did email them again, project sponsor about that and have added information will be helpful. But i feel very confident because theres this continues order back and forth between the operators. The project sponsor. 1327 columbus is really a small project that am getting all kinds of sizes right now because the [inaudible] which ones are into their overdoing it which is fine by me. This is to demolish a twostory commercial and build a fourstory retail and singlefamily home. Basically the guys that lived there i guess they own the property. The commercial. Now he wants to live there. Is going to keep two floors as commercial and live on the opportune floor spirit so one family home. Single dwelling right . Peered but its within distance to Fiddlers Green and the rock so that is a Bottle Service nightclub as well. So make sure there was communication even though like i said i dont this one doesnt meet the standards of what were supposed to be reviewing. So i force the communication is in the planner the Standard Commission and reiterated the language could i put that in here because i thought it was interesting. The emailproject sponsor emailed and said, basicallyis it here . Owner fully aware of the noises and will accept the noise that your business generates. He is the owner of the pro