Transcripts For SFGTV Entertainment Commission 81616 2016082

SFGTV Entertainment Commission 81616 August 20, 2016

Beginning e dbi i believe thats the timeline there is a geotech report. Right. That the people voluntarily done the appellant brought up was that required by dbi mr. You said no, we have a geotech report but that takes more time. What about the distinction the difference between the one to one and one to two two to one sorry. The difference one says one thing and one another. Thats the slope of the grade so it various one to one and one to two 90 degrees back. Not an inconsistency here. I dont see that at all. Ill leave the more gentle the slope the less the slides. All that being said i understand their concerns i dont think the bigger project i might say differently but the project were looking at says something ive dealt with landslides and its not good i saw that was a terrible thing i understand that as well. You dont think given the limited scope of the work that their concerns are justified. Not after speaking to mr. You the dbi engineer no. This came in front of us. Okay. I remember it is a disaster a terrible thing to have that happen to losing tare home like that. A question mr. Duffy it was the permitted was based on a set of plans so it was revised so what are the option youre shaking your head. Were not doing something. Commissioner fung said no revised drawing on the pier he was Caesar Chavez my heads not knowing what that is thats a engineering report for the dynamic and the deputy of the drilled piers i think what i heard the geotech report to be worse if they came up with a new design they didnt have to do a long process and came up with ill say less of an impact than what we previously reviewed thats my inspection as an inspector my opinion not as much evacuation were okay with but less not a depth and size we could take the recommendation and the reports and pop up on the plan. Well. We can go to deliberations. So what were hearing is this is not a big deal and overwhelms if im the appellant it is a big deal im not diminishing that but not a major relation were hearing that the project sponsor is willing to revise the plan, but youre not in a position tonight to accept that plan and bless it on behalf of the dbi so procedurally he know that the project sponsor didnt want to see us again, im appreciative of that we have lots of work to do but something appropriate that we should postpone and continue so you can sort out the revised plan and then further dialogue is that the the responsible thing to do. Ill be okay with that, i thought about that myself because we could get the drawings clandz we have a depth on this a size well have to get on this somewhere and in addition he could look at commissioner wilson concern about the information sheet not a problem we have a geotech report but for another layer for safety we can do that. Okay. Can i have the permit holder step to the podium please. Real simple by adding the alternative youve made this more difficult and so by adding the alternative means that is probably potentially could go forward are you happy either way with accepting our original plan as is or are you insisting i prefer the alternative plan. And what is the ramifications for preferring the alternatives other than. You have the original plan if we vote on that where the cards lie they lie if we do our alternative plan you may be visiting us again. So then he guess the other alternative if we go and vote in favor a. Their appealable. Thats not quite the entire process of course, the board has not determined how we vote but should they votes in your favor or show the president of voting in your favor together you could potential submit the drawings with the appropriate dimensions and would be recalendared within a couple of weeks at the which point this board could agree if we agree adopt overseeing plans and therefore you dont have to have another permits revision or submission. The only reason they dont center the depth the Structural Engineer is different than the geotech engineer. So the permits said of which youve submitted is going what the final and the geotech will never put any pencil to paper on a construction document. I want to say i dont want to vote on this as it stands because my understanding from the permit holder they actually prefer and it sounds like a better design is the revised one. Im personally more happy with the design. We were already doing it before this came up. Why not let us go into deliberation. Ill agree although we change that when i look at this i see 3 tiers 18 inches two 3 feet deep thats not much weight only the weight of the deck their, their designed predominant not much ill prefer it would be less than a 20 foot long retaining wall which theyll have to cut to a certain extent. So the option then if were in agreement we will prefer first that we think that is permitted was appropriately issued we can continue this case allow them to submit the appropriate documents and then vote to incorporate that into their permitted set. If were going to do that do you want the further clarification. I think that you know theres no reason why mr. Duffy cant run the geotech report and have them look at where to consider the procedure you know in an appropriate way. Commissioners ill be more comfortable westbound that as well the deputy of the size could be looked at as well by a dbi engineer and kind of where i prefer that as well. Thank you. Thank you. Im supportive of that i am not the only im not post of the appeal i think the neighbors blow has been accommodating and the cost of this geotech report of 5 thousand dollars not required is probably 25 to thirty percent of the cost if not more so considering that neighbors asked them to do it ive not heard they offered to coordinate in any of the payment but ill go with commissioner fungs suggestion. You know if im the appellant i want some clarity i want some comfortable im not to support their appeal as the president but i think that is responsible for us to give them as much comfortable as we possessly can we have a report lets let the city review it and as willingness for the plan to be changed and lets continue it hear it in a couple of weeks after dbi reviewed a new plan and backed by a geotechnical report and give everybody comfortable. Ill move to continue to case to september 14th you are next meeting. We have one next week but, yes. Yes. That might be two soon. Can we check if next week okay. Then ill continue is this to august 24th to allow the Building Department to review the geotech report and clarify the directors bulletin and for then the permit holder to submit revised drawings. Vice president are you confront comfortable with the fact the revised drawings will not gets to the board until the hearing date i dont expect theyll get them tomorrow. It will be okay theyre similar to the documents theyve submitted. Okay all right. So the motion from the Vice President is to continue this matter to next week august 24, 2016, to allow dbi to review the geotechnical report and clarify the directors bulletin and the permit holder to submit revised plans on that motion commissioner lazarus. We have the vote from the president commissioner honda and commissioner wilson and commissioner swig. Okay that motion carries with a vote of 5 to zero and. Theres no further business. This evening. Thank you for participating in one of the shortest meetings this waiting patiently the meeting will tom to the order this the the sfaevengs im bryant tan the president of the commission that couple ever housekeeping items please turn off your cell phones if youre a member of the public and want to speak about an item you see agendized we will have speaker cards fill it out and ill call you up when we opium and finally thank you to sophisticating and the Media Services for airing this live start with the roll call director kane. Commissioner thomas commissioner joseph commissioner lee president tan. Here quorum not a full house. Right so commissioner perez i believe is on his way commissioner frost and sxoog are both absent this evening. All right. Start off with general Public Comment this is for Public Comment on any business that pertains to the business of the Entertainment Commission you dont see agendas listed within person coming up. Good evening, commissioners scott i want to make a comment i want went a great informational semi far at 2 oclock a great presentation by a law firm about bmi and add cap a lot of piano people people are effected and dont know how to be compliant and it was nice pathway i think that want to thank the Entertainment Commission for making a lot of people aware of that it was very successful. Can i ask you a question since was there another way to be compliance besides paying the bill. Some people are an pandora you know system and theres a way to pay through them they showed exemptions if you quality so it give you perimeters on when you it effects you or not effects you but bottom line it should be addressed and not avoided and people get letters dont do anything about it some days at the go ahead sued than it becomes problematic. Thank you okay. All right. Any other Public Comment. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Move on to item 2 approval of the minutes from both june 21st and august 2nd any motions. Move to approve all right. Is there a second. Second and. And so you know, we consulted with the City Attorney and able to approve all minutes whether you attend or not and perhaps every commissions can double check those minutes and those packets are ready prior to the meeting there is a motion that has been seconded any Public Comment on the minutes approval no . All right. Okay. Cool commissioner lee commissioner joseph commissioner thomas president tan with that, the minutes are approved and item 3 report from the executive director and our staff. Hello youre done. Done. I cant talk to you anymore. Okay. Ill be brief he apologize he was going to bring is Small Business owner something to hand out on the first item an update of the train on august 5th part of you mean continue to be part of attempt but i city and bay area to improve our Service Public transit for workforce of issues and patrons and so i know that ben sitting here and more data points i attended a press conference for the mayor and some transit officials on friday august 5th i think that went well to promote the campaign the Public Information campaign so one thing on approved service and know where it is to go and happening krurn you if not to after im done come to the microphone not very comfortable with that and again, i apologize i was going to bring you the press release but hello great yeah, im sorry i should have brought 4, 3, 2 , 1 should things we had a press conference to kickoff the campaign the first late night transportation and the first night of 3 thousand people half said they especially\know about all Night Service or generally about the all nights service and didnt know where that ran and studies have been a barrier for use of all night alcatraz transit thanks both the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency the thirty second add icon about the all nighter and the bart stations and on buses message about encouraging people to check all out all nighter. Org and a lot of information about the options and well continue that campaign with additional work if you head to night life. Org youll see some marketing materials given our focus and emphasize on late night workers a lot of the materials and add options are focused on telling workers after your shift is over or medicaid to your shift all nighter. Org. Are those returning currently. Yeah. We have an initial set of prints and bus adds in the Service Center and bart stations i say one on the 19 bus yesterday its ones cable but that is a first set of marketing working with and amplify that if the future. I recently ran into someone that complained about night life transportation and lived on an owl line and used the owl line and said she didnt feel safe is there any data on the safeties of the night life. Safety is absolutely a concern and something in our survey data i think that significant portion of responded and certainly a higher percentage of female respondents said that safety detold her them from traveling all night hours one thing to understand the data about all night transportation that we dont have up until this point a set of metrics about what the actual all nights in terms of reliability, in terms of on time performances, safety and safety issues as well were working in parallel it the marketing work and other work establishing a set of data medics over time well understand what specifically all night conditions from their preefshg. Anyone elaborate why they didnt feel safe. A number of things certainly the physical conditions of the streets themselves in terms of Street Lighting and not having a sense of belonging what the bus will come thats been a concern that many people have expressed the people are getting off their shifts they have cash they feel urban design safe those are 4 this Partnership Webinar has informed a variety of strangulations that weve been working on. Awesome thank you. Thanks. Sorry for if segue sorry by that and then the Public Comment that you already heard is on the next update we did, in fact, engaged with the oewd as of today, this happened on the cap issues sounds like thirty people were in attendance and the attorney put out good information did they film it hopefully, well have access to that and lick it to if theyll put it on there we can all use the footage depend on the idiot so thats helpful because this is the thing that comes up every single year anytime people get a new operation or start advertising about the entertainment well get those letters and a quick educator and done maybe we have the problem somewhat solved and the other item under staff update is that as you recall we changed in july the procedures as well as the code related to extending the grants the commission asked for the staff roster an extensive grant was given formally so ill do this this evening and report to you that on august 10th of this year we granted an estimation of 24 months through august 2018 of the conditional grant to the Golden State Warriors for the eastern at the mission bay and again, im reporting to you not necessary will i for action but as information you have requested we do that thats how ill bring those to you as they come up if youre interested in we did get a letter from the attorneys about why, if you will, the judge cause the language in the code and if you read the papers you know probably that is quite a bit of litigation potentially a good deal of construction so hopefully that two year with do will be adequate. Is that two year window not adequate will they could be. Theyll not i dont know if we can get further ill is to refresh myself. Ask for a second extension. Okay. Ill have to go back and a lot i dont know who the trajectory of that eastern im sure they want to go as fast as they can but things keep on happening well have to roll. So good okay. And thats for me unless questions im going to turn it over to the director. No which inspector first. Good evening, commissioners so things to report to you start with the at t park with the guns and roses concert i did the sounds like check and around if the neighborhood they did a couple of things different from the last several shows they dropped speakers on the north side of the venue to keep the sound from blasting in castro hill where a lot of complainants were coming from it seemed they moved the speakers closer to the seats this helps with the sound whatever i dont hear anything from castro hill from 8 to 9 that was great and down near the stadium obviously heard it but pretty good with the sounds like i was impressed. Did we get complaints coming from castro hill. I dont think so. We got one from castro boosters a long time resident they especially\hear anything and very happy. Wow. Whats the opposite of a complaint. The time they did a concert weve not heard anything with that water show. It was a it was a clear night. It was only in the studio. That was clear it had an effect on the sound. Was 2 guns and roses traveling or at t parks. Im not sure it is looks like. Therein lies the difference. I dont believe that it is atenolol informed us of that. Because i mean as add that into Public Comment. I did a walk through salsa party a rock bar several complaint after the email complainants said basically the disturbances with relatively infrequent like something started up recently thats why 33 she was complaining ive been by there no compliance issues or on the sidewalk or coming and going a handful of people not a dozen people not a compliance issue with that public works theyve been receiving complaints about noise from a complainant after doing a little bit back and forth with him, i contacted the management and told them they needed to be in contact with him and workout the issue they went blaefrd and coordinated and apparently got the situation together i want to follow up and figure out what happens the situation was good and the playlands bar receiving complaint from several xranlts im by ever be weekend and the same as for months not a sounds like issue. Their complaining about sound or the amount of people. Complaining about sound. I cant believe showing how many people are waiting for that spot. Youll know this one. Hours waiting to get in i guess. But i mean when i did the inspection you can hear the bails one or two decimals not near where im not sure that the complainants understanding that but not be enforce full 2, 3, 4 communicating. Are they directly next door. Their diagonally located across the street. The particular complaints his window faces the venue and ventilation it is a bad situation for her blue mostly from the vehicles and the patrons anyway to kind of a tough situation but nevertheless, the venue shouldnt be theyre in inclines moving on a couple of new complainants the dirty pecan theyre a salon a common thing around the city the complainant says theyre doing entertainment i talked with him he complained through the email and during the entertainment fence let me know i can try to do something if im on shift or whatever so nevertheless, i told them guarding send me an email ill check it out and in the meantime forward the materials the promotion materials as evidence or whatever

© 2025 Vimarsana