The california government code and only in compliance of the subdivision of that subsection it is acknowledged from fremont and the report in the report required by subsection c4 a nuke of types of conversions and such others information as the director and the board of supervisors determines lawyer with no Decision Makers and the public just to be clear section 3 so 7 of both of the pieces of legislation grant the Zoning Administrator authority to bring grant waivers from the density and parking rear yard closures and open requirements this is circumstance subscribed and limit by them so forth in sections 2 c4 and c sub it. Supervisor cohen you may have wasted a lot of energy with all that talk our deputy City Attorney as comments with our read into the record amendments. Mr. Gibner. John gibner, deputy City Attorney. So weve not prepared supervisor peskin the amendments that supervisor peskin read into the record i understand the goal here on going both items the amendments that supervisor farrell will read in in a few minutes to make the items identical the most of amendments that supervisor cohens just read are in supervisor farrells version which we have as i understand and to the board today depending on the outcome i eagerly await if the supervisor peskin version is the version that the board can you please tell us ill ask the advertising in my office to prepare im not sure whether we can get that done because of other staffing needs and other things by tomorrow in order to get it to include if on next weeks agenda you can pass his ordinance on First Reading and you may be able to pass the ordinance on second reading but possible that ordinance will not be back until august 2nd i want to make you aware of that before the board. Thank you commissioner peskin any followup comments. Supervisor farrell is that a motion by supervisor cohens. Oh, supervisor cohens made a read into the record and the motion to amend can we take that without objection . Without objection the amendment pays for item 61 only supervisor farrell continue thank you sxoepd so colleagues the point as supervisor peskin and i are amending our piece of legislation to be identical after the amendments are cemented and well ensue my amendment is absent short on my version on item 75 going to an page 6 line 21 and 20 delete and replace that with the same section as supervisor peskin read into the record saying that section 9 at the end of the entire that i was legislation it is uncodified and a report of assessor dwelling units the adus construction be proposed for the planning code the shall include the adus constructed are proposed to be constructed from the planning date of this section and any predecessor legislation up to 12 months Effective Date of this ordinance id like to make the motion on item 75. Supervisor farrell has made a motion to amend with the amendments read into the record seconded by supervisor cohens colleagues well take that without objection. Without objection the amendments pass for item 75 unanimously supervisor avalos. Just a point of order before the coin toss i want to make sure we are voting on the issue or measure that was lifted from the Michelle ObamaNational Convention speech in 2008. laughter . Colleagues are you ready for the coin toss itstem 75 a motion to table item 61. So moved seconded by supervisor farrell colleagues well take that without objection. Item 6 is a tabled and on item number 75 as amended please call roll. Supervisor mark farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee no sdmalz supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen there are 10ize with no, no supervisor yee in the descents the ordinance passed on the First Reading. All right. Madam clerk item number 62. Item 62 a resolution inform impose Emergency Rooms for an 18 most for all Residential Hotels requires is conditional use authorization for any application for a permit to conservative Residential Hotels and make environmental findings. Roll call vote. On item 62. Supervisor farrell supervisor kim supervisor mar supervisor peskin supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen there are 11 is. The resolution is adopted unanimously call item 63. A resolution to authorize the department of the environment to submit auto integrated for the recycling and recovery. Colleagues, can we take that same house, same call . Well take that without objection. The resolution is adopted unanimously all right. Lets go to the next item item 64 and 65 a special order at the 3 00 p. M. To common pursuant to the resolution adopted on june 7th. Madam clerk by the way, call the items we need to actually go back to the budget and go back to the tax and i want to make sure that we get that Business Done item 6 through 29 before this board. Okay. And also item 39 and 34 and 39 are we ready for 39 and 34. Okay. So item 34 m please call the roll. On item 34 supervisor farrell supervisor kim excuse me so are we voting obtain all the items together. Separately 34. Is Homelessness Service our colleagues, were not supposed to interrupt a roll call vote vote. Im mark farrell clarify we called a budgetary items and were voting on item 34. No. Supervisor mar no supervisor cohens no supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee no supervisor avalos no. Supervisor breed supervisor campos no. Supervisor cowen there are 5 is and 6 notice with commissioner kim and supervisor mar and supervisor peskin and supervisor yee and supervisor campos in the descent the Charter Amendment will not be submitted. Madam president sorry supervisor wiener holds on a second. Point of order. Supervisor wiener. I make a motion to rescind the vote of item 34 is there a second seconded by supervisor tang and colleagues well take that without objection. Without objection the votes on item 34 has been rescinded supervisor wiener. Thank you madam president and thank you, colleagues for the recession we can discuss this measure i think on item 34 that has been called, however, we also have item 39 which is the three quarters sales tax. The item was called they were called and continued to later in the Board Meeting he asked if we were ready to bring back those items thats why i called for the vote. I said that and appreciate the recession those constituent a significant investment in two of the Critical Issues facing the city the massive needs of our Transportation Network both in San Francisco and regionally and the sloul essential need to create permanent housing for our homeless residence both housing and Navigation Centers for people to transition into housing were we initially had proposed a half cents sales tax for transportation through a collaborative stakeholders process we decided instead to go with the three quarters cent sales tax and coming up the Charter Amendment one half cents will be for transportations and one quarter for permanent housing for homelessness and the naektsz this process a number of supervisors including myself and madam chair rosales we had a Board Network of Homeless Service provides as well as transient advocates and worked together 0 collaboratively to move forward a measure that will produce approximately, 1 million a year for transportation including improvements to muni and facilities and to munis quality strategy and affordability to make sure our low income residents have strong access to Public Transportation that will provide few minutes for vision zero to reduce and ultimate eliminate the people being killed and soourl joufrd on the road to help Bicycle Safety and Pedestrian Safety and fund permanent dedicated stream of funding for rotate resurfacing not depend on the ups and downs of the budget and produce significant funds for the regional partners bart and produce 50 million a year that is one billion dollars over 20 years to pardon me house homeless and create Navigation Center that board is on record over and over and over and over now and then were in a state of emergency around homeless homelessness the state should be in a state of emergency. We need to aggressively fund the naektsd when we passed the budget we assumed the budget and the department of homelessness and Supportive Services has consolidated the department under the leadership of the talented jeff is going to rely on this 50 million a year a billion dollars over 20 years to fund and aggressive strategy to permanently house our Homeless Population and to have naeths so that people can transition off the streets through the naeths and ultimately into housing. This measure is so social this is those are two of the most basic responsibilities housing our homeless and insuring great transportation in San Francisco we should send this to the bottled i want to note that the city sales tax is going to go on by a half of cents this year and even though this is the three quarters sales taxes our sales taxes is up by a quarter not the three quarters of a cent colleagues he urge your support of this important measure and people hope we can put politics aside and g agree we need to fund the hours for Homeless People as well as the Public Transportation i urge your support. Thank you supervisor peskin. Supervisor avalos. Thank you heres a moment where if things are not moving forward with the new revenue measure i will lay down any arms and support the three quarters staircaales taxe not easy to do that i feel based on the conversations yesterday with advocates who i work with more many, many years to make sure we have the affordability and transit Quality Built into the processes for the mta budgets and this Charter Amendment will are flexibility in terms of move money allocated to affordability and service i will end up supporting the with sales tax ive been disappointed with how we had very corroborative and collaborative and congenial discussions about crafting this amendment and how that fell apart with measures i felt were undermining our fort to have a common approach to how the transportation and homelessness in particular homelessness but . O this is more about me and what i want were looking at putting forward capital for our Transportation System were looking for creating greater exits for homelessness i cant vote against that measure when that great good is before us colleagues puts they names on ballot measures that are mean spirtsdz and serve as language that is in the books that gives the police broad power to remove the continents without notice twentyfour hours notice that doesnt matter and i was not happy with having moving forward on clear exits to homelessness but under the stick approach the police have even if theyre sharing the housing that is available the housing is a finite number but in the spirits the city california together to over multi measures those measure forward with the twaertsdz of a cent sales tax ill put my different differences aside and move forward what i think that the right thing to do that many people outside of city hall worked for and hoping that we can get to the ballot and win at the ballot as well i wanted to make that announcement and other alternatives where we can get revenue ill be supporting what we have before us. Thank you, supervisor kim. Thank you want to talk about my position on those two items i actually do support the expenditure plan that is in the Charter Amendment in item 34 i think those are great use of funds both towards transportation and Homeless Services what i dont support of source of revenue i have stated before in the report my position on taxed i think are aggressive a point sufficing an additional aggressive take into consideration tax i building impacts our low income low income spend less theyll spends lessen sales tax but that money does matter thats why we dont tax everyone on income with the same percentage if you make less you get tacked less well have flat tax by the way, we know that 10 percent income means for are more than a person making one Million Dollars i want to respective the work on the Transportation Organization i would have support a percent tax i cant say supports on the. 75 sales tax before any measures additional measures put on the measures i will be voting no my vote is not political a position that is long held and not support of. 75 look at this or live one within the means and so my opposition again to the source of these additional funds on sales tax not how the expenditure plan is put forward today. Thank you, supervisor kim. Supervisor peskin. Thank you madam president and supervisor kims couldnt have said that better than that waste of time ill associate microorganism with her comments. Thank you supervisor campos. Thank you madam president very difficult issue for me, i have to say is the idea of funds homelessness with the regressive tax is something that a general rule i dont like i actually think we should have gone a different route in terms of where we are in this i think there are different ways the city can fund homelessness and it is regrettable were in the predict if you want to fund the homelessness you have to support something that ultimately will hurt protecting people more than it does everyone else i dont think that is how we should address this problem. Im balanced with that said, i think that is one of the things where youre making it difficult decision that has bad consequences either way at the end of the day it is the comments and thoughts this is the advocates about the impact direct impact on homelessness people and the services were funding if this tax measure didnt go forward that weigh it for me to go willing to change my vote to let this item go forward but i think we need to think more creatively as a city about homelessness and at the end of the day for me homelessness has become that one issue that everyone copes raising and talking about and the reason we put farjd forward a piece of legislation around the creation and establishment of Navigation Centers was to respond to that in supporting this measure we want to make sure that that strategy is funded but i also think that we have to go beyond you know a regrief tax he hope we have a greater and larger conversation as the city how to move forward and as important hsa as new revenue how to actually look at the exit revenue that we are spends what is the effectiveness the programs were funding i believe that we need to have an analysis and quite frankly for this tax or any measure to pass at the ballot well have to present that to the voters. Thank you supervisor yee. Ill keep it short the last two or 3 speakers i agree with it is difficult to ask our residents to keep on paying more and more and more thats why i said earlier this is a funny way to balance similar to the comments were making i will be supporting some things but i would have considering the. 5 even that would be difficult base know that is reingressive at the same time there is a lot of needs in the city and we cant keep on asking the residents to be paying for all the needs asking the question of are we making the best efficient uses of the revenues we do have. Thank you, madam chair i mean, ill be supportive of two measures i want to thank the months and months of work from the transportation equitable working group to the transportation advocates Vision Zero Coalition especially walk sf calls from Homeless Service provides to Grassroots Coalition on homelessness and others for weighing in on those important measures i wish we could have found a half cent approach with the funding for homelessness measures we were not able to do that ill be supportive largely because i viewer that has as equitable funding stream that supports the transportation on a board level but the equality concerns thanks to supervisor farrell and supervisor wiener and the Mayors Office i feel that eQuality Built in makes it palatable and hope the communities support the three quarters sales taxes hsa as to move forward to the ballot. Supervisor yee. Roll call vote. Okay. Colleagues on item number 39 madam clerk call the roll. Supervisor farrell. Supervisor kim no supervisor mar supervisor peskin no supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee no supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen there are 8 is and that notice nos were you supervisor kim supervisor peskin and supervisor yee in the descent that ordinance passes on the First Reading and item 34. Supervisor farrell supervisor kim im sorry supervisor kim. Can you repeat our vote supervisor kim no supervisor mar supervisor peskin no supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee no supervisor avalos supervisor breed supervisor campos supervisor cowen there are 8 is and 3 notices with supervisor kim supervisor mar and supervisor yee in the descent. The Charter Amendment will be submitted. Actually madam clerk i think you had that 0 wrong. Its supervisor kim and supervisor peskin and supervisor yee in the descents the Charter Amendment will be submitted. Supervisor mar. Well, i was correcting the