Good afternoon, everyone this is the friday, december 11, 2015, meeting the Public Safety and neighborhood safeway committee of the board of supervisors im eric mar the change and to my right is supervisor campos and ms. Alyssa were being televised by sophisticating thank you to jim smith and charles kremack to this is not live but will be posted on line and give us our announcements devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the january 5th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you. I would to begin with voices of young people that are outside of city hall and marching on San Francisco streets today. Dont shoot. repeated. you guys hear me do not shoot. repeated. do not shoot. Reverend black lives matter. As wear meeting hundreds of young people that walked out of Mission High School and high schools around San Francisco from the reports of the weekly San FranciscoCommunity School june gordon and galileo and lincoln and mission and gateway and many other middle school are participating i think a lot of the mercy housing are hands up dont shoot my hopes many mroflgz will treat them with respect their and right to protest is represented with that, could you please call the first item autopsy an ordinance amending the police code. People leaving or storing a load vehicle with a gun the sponsor sponsor a supervisor campos that if you i want to note that this is a very important item for us and the scope of the original ordinances that focused on Law Enforcement personnel leaving fire arms in vehicles expanded to now politically to anyone that unattended vehicle we wanted it so in San Francisco certain rules and procedures are followed we want to keep those guns from ended up in the wrong hands i look forward to hearing the Public Comment i want to say at the outset from the beginning we have pushed to move it this legislation forward as quickly as possible legally, however, things we have to do which one of the things it is critical to meet and confer with the Law Enforcement personnel that work in the city and county of San Francisco that can be a process that takes time and so we have started that process were on a the middle of the process because of that once Public Comment is completed im to ask to continue this item to the call of the chair because of the meeting confer process not have this ordinance move forward until the process is completed we hope will happen in january of this coming year. Thank you supervisor campos i wanted to acknowledge supervisor yee is a cosponsor as well as myself and lets open up for Public Comment we have one card i know that r0sh89 wants to speak and ms. Brown anyone else be please come forward that will be continued to the call of the chair after Public Comment. Sir. Go ahead walter. Please store those guns safely because of those guns there is no no where to run no where to hide once e would you store them safely no where to run or hide keep is safe and raw youll be safe by and by thanks. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Were going to close Public Comment if people dont come up to speak right now. Next speaker. Hello my name is Paulette Brown im here in respect to my son who was murdered august 14, 2018, he was shot with an semiautomatic gun thirty rounds into my son today his case is not solved im concerned about the gun violence thats been going around it says here that gunfire firearms are the third leading killer of children alps 1 to 17 how many guns are going to be on the street killing our children how many guns are brought out of trunk we think about the young man that did the mural was shot and that gun was stolen out of a Police Officer vehicle how many guns are going to be stolen and whos account for our children where the guns are out of the Police Officers vehicles or whether their came into from our children buying guns illegally how long will the mothers suffer we say all lives matter black lives dont matter but all lives matter all i have left my sons death laying on a jury necessary and this is what cabin violence did for my son we want justice for our children keep our cases open and make those Police Officers accountable for what happened to laurel woods because u because the mothers never get over the pain by police or black a black all lives matter thank you ms. Brown. Next speaker. My name is robert carrageenan supervisors regarding the storage of firearms in unattended Motor Vehicles some provisions in the section are unworkable for the ordinance one method of storage is to have a lockbox affixed to the trunk another allow able to have a lockbox permanently affixed to the vehicle underneath wants seat and shout out guns and rifles are covered under this case a lockbox would be bigger . Not going to fit under the seat of a car and many cars whos trunks are two small and having a lockbox in plain sight is an invitation for thieves to steal and in addition people you get or often travel with people that go to fire ranges and permanently attach two or three lockboxes is unworkable thank you. Is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak Public Comment is closed. Mr. Campos. Thank you very much again, i want to thank the speakers and i especially want to acknowledge ms. Brown for coming to this board time and time again to remind us of the tragic lives that the tramples that have taken the lives of so many people because of gun violence and noted because of the meeting confer process im going to make a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair in the hope that the meat and confer will meet in january and finally take action in San Francisco on this ordinance in january what i would say to the gentleman that spoke about how complicated and difficult to store firearms in a vehicle what were saying here is that if you choose to leave a firearm in an unattended vehicle there are certain things to do in the city and county of San Francisco you can choose not to leave a firearm in an nonattended vehicle and this is not in any way infringe on anyones Second Amendment rights when you are the owner of firearms there are certain responsibilities you should you have and certain things you have to do consistent with those responsibilities with that, id like to again make a motion to continue this to the call of the chair and thank you to my staff and hope to have a vote as quickly as possible in january thank you. Well do that without objection thank you madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body . Theres no further business. Thank you very much meeting adjourned i should announce 5 meeting the joint meeting of lafco and the other meeting coming up t5 meeting the joint meeting of lafco and the other meeting coming uh5 meeting the joint meeting of lafco and the other meeting coming up e5 meeting the joint meeting of lafco and the other meeting coming up meeting the joint meeting of lafco and the other meeting coming up shortly. Good afternoon today is tuesday, september 22, 2015. Welcome to the local Agency Formation commission of the San FranciscoEthics Commission my name is john avalos the chair of the commission and will be a joint commission joint meeting that the Public Safety and Neighborhood Committee ill allow the chair of the committee to open up that meeting. Thank you chair avalos im eir mar to my right is supervisor avalos and were always Police Department of pleased to have joint meeting with lafco. Our clerk is alyssa and todays joint meeting is broadcast by sfgovtv staff jim smith and charles kremack also erica major is coclerking this meeting madam clerk, any announcements . Electronic devices. Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Thank you and could you please call the roll for lafco commissioner avalos commissioner breed absent. Commissioner campos and commissioner crews commissioner lindo commissioner mar player you have a quorum how do we want to do this mr. Chair. A motion to excuse commissioner breed. To excuse if lafco supervisor breed commissioner breed a motion from commissioner crews and seconded by and excuse the newest appointees from this meeting and seconded by supervisor campos well take that without objection. Okay. If you could call the first item. Item within we think the board of supervisors urging the California PublicUtilities Commission to reject the Pacific Gas Electric proposed increases to net be able to metering fees. Just want we want to call them at the same time call 2. Item 2 the board of supervisors file urging the California PublicUtilities Commission to reexamine fairness of increases. Okay. Very good thank you m madam clerk and colleagues two resolutions before us that are very, very important, important our cleanpowersf effort pg e has filed with the California PublicUtilities Commission two motions seeking to one to get changes in the Net Metering Program that will be similar harmful for people in San Francisco and over lafco our cleanpowersf program also theyve proposed a new fee for the exit fee for the power electrical power from pg e when people customers go into the cleanpowersf program the proposed fee is called the what is is called mr. Fried actually trying to draw that up. Youre talking about the exit fee. Yes. The public charge in different power charge in different adjustments. The power charge in different adjustments. Correct yes. So the impact of those two fees own the program for cleanpowersf would reduce the funds we have available for build out and could make our program less competitive with pg e and preventing us from the robust roll out and less funds to do build out this is a direct attack against our cleanpowersf Power Program two resolutions to say ask the California PublicUtilities Commission not to approve those increases that is dramatic two increases for the residents i think that is important to talk about some of the things going on behind the scenes thats been going on earlier this year we put on two measures on the ballot the lafco and city put on proposition h that was really about move forward with our cleanpowersf program and have a clear statement about what kind of energy were producing the iuoe under stern have put out their own version of the property g do undermine our effort would be they realized that the city was probable going to prevail on our measure that would not be good for them and their measure would lose and it very well well, did to you make sure theyre not attacking our measure and stern from i b w worked very much to try at one end promote the measure he was going to try toy kill prop g earlier this week, i was tarnishing to mr. Stern he said the energy fee that is working its way to the Public Utilities commission was all but settled our resolution before us today regarding the metering was really not important anywhere i dont believe that is true and talking with lafco jason fried sdrook interest the California PublicUtilities Commission has not made a decision on the Net Energy Metering and talking to a liaison who is here in 9 puc whos name a cody he said the decision is not made either so heres what howard stern told me are signed the metering decision is pretty much set nothing it changing and i dont believe that is for what ive been hearing that is true things are locked up between ibw and the California PublicUtilities Commission to present and let us know what we have before us. Sure jason fried executive director for lafco on those matters ive invited speakers if a statewide level and have presentations on each of the items into a local level how it impacts San Francisco directly so we will take them in the order on the agenda and our presenter from solar to present followed by a receptionist in the San FranciscoEnvironmental Department talking about the impact the lafco and the pc i a and having lean energy present on a statewide prospective and have the sfpuc how to impacts us with that, ill call of sue huhuh h h sue is an do the presentation and the next presenter after that. Convalescent Committee Members thank you. I am supposed to say sfgovtv goes to the power point so, yeah im susan the west coast with go solar a nonprofit Advocacy Organization that is working around the country to bring solar into the mainstream about the efforts to slow down the rooftop by attacking and policy called net meters were in the middle of the debate the commission has not made a determination i could talk about this topic for many hours but keep it to 5 minutes as a context to start important to note were reilly in the midst of a rooftop innovation in San Francisco we serve 3 percent of big incurs demand the average price has dropped by more than half by 2009 and tripled the solar on the rooftop since 2011 and seeing 2 3rds of the rooftop solar installation happening in lshgsz neighborhoods it is good news for the state but prompting a backlash that seize it as a threat is their directly attacking net meters not only in california but dozens of other states across the country an explanation of what net metering and simple method for crediting people so when a roosevelt is producing more energy than the confers needed it get sent back the grid owe the skpz sell it so the metering makes sure that the similar customers get credit it allows their meters to roll backwards and give us full Retail Credit for kilowatt for the clean theyre paying the utility when necessary buy the hours so legislationer passed it in the early 2000 and have it in place across the country but in 2013 in response from the utility the legislator passed a law that told the commission by the end of this year determine what the net goals should be when they reach a 5 percent cap what 5 percent of the peak demand is served by the rooftop solar and pg e will hit that cap around the middle of next year and so all 3 of the utilities as a proceeding in the puc have submitted proposals to end that 3450er9 and drastically reduce the solar bill saves and each utility proposed a different proposal but at pg e they have a host of different proposed changing reduce the bill by more 50 percent that ends the metering you get the same credit for what is returned to the grid and on top of to add a 3 theres per kilowatt monthly demand charge it is pegged to the maximum demand that a customer buys from the utilities so it is hard for residential customers to predict we see anywhere in the country the utility has levied levied a demand charge the customers dont know their maximum demand will be and it is difficult charge to manage more them as well to pg e is proposed to disallow rolling over the bill credit that is part of our net metering structure and theyve made other proposals ill not get into detail but you know it is essentially if pg e proposal was adopted by the puc it will drastically reduce the savings to the customers and dramatically slow down continued solar growth and so you can all utilities theyve proposed this combination of reduced to credit for exported clean energy and add fees on top of that for solar customers so you might be wondering you know how which of that is impacting the solar customers bill in pg e territory and that gets complicate because it matters what the customers demand and the size of solar ray and so on we crunched the numbers in an analysis to the puc look at an average residential scloo solar customer in fresno a hot spot for the state right now this graph shows a customer who is under net meters the status quo and have got solar with a no down payment even though up as many solar customers do on net metering the customer saves over 20 percent a month before they got solar but pg es process is adopted by the puc the savings go down to 3 percent youre talking about a decline of more than 80 percent in solar savings to customer under the pg e proposal compared with net meters so you know in response to those attacks from the utilities weve got a number of pro solar voices including my organization is advocates for the preservation of net metering and for californian not make it more expensive for low and middleincome and an out power of the preserve more comments as in the puc has seen on any issue we have a very Broad Coalition of voices from City Government to save organizations not only organizations urging the commissions not to adopt but stick with the metering so where we are in the process raw the c puc about issue their appropriately decision and another a round of applause do comment and thirty days before they ado