Regular hearing for thursday, september 10, disruptions of any kind. Please silence any devices that may sound off during the proceedings. And when speaking before the commission, if you care to, do state your name for the record. Id like to call roll at this time. Commissioner president fong commissioner wu commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore and commissioner richards commissioners, that places you under your agenda is items proposed for continuance items 1 ab for the case bryant street large project conditional use authorization are proposed for indefinite continuance and item 2 c on summertime set skwufgs conditional use authorization is also proposed for indefinite continuance i have not other items proposed for continuance and there are no speaker cards any Public Comments for the 3 items proposed for continuance not seeing any Public Comment is closed. Commissioner richards move to continue items one ab, 2. Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion to continue items one and two. Commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you under our consent calendar back to you and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. Item 3 case no. 2014 at barn very well avenue conditional use authorization and item 4 Mission Street conditional use authorization let me see if that is a request to speak. Okay any Public Comment on item the two items on the consent calendar not sure. My name is david the 1 on Mission Street. If you want to speak to it well pull it off of consent and we can hear it for the regular calendar later and i understand. Are you opposed or in support. I want to make a comment if i knew the address of 15 and mission between 15th and mission. Further out. Much further out. I live in the mission thats okay. If iceland sit down. I wanted to make sure if youre not opposed then maybe well take action and submit your comment under general Public Comment. That will work. Not seeing any on the Public Comment commissioner moore. Move to approve. Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion to approve items under consent calendar for items three and four. Commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you under commission matters item 5 considerations of adoption of draft minutes for august 15, 2015. Any Public Comment on item draft minutes not seeing any Public Comment is closed. Is closed commissioner wu. Move to approve draft minutes. Do i hear a second. Second. Second. Thank you commissioners on that motion to adopt the minutes. Commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner johnson commissioner moore commissioner richards commissioner wu and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on item 6 commissioner questions or comments. Commissioner antonini. Well 3 things briefly first of all, a lot of us are interested in things that had oriented in San Francisco one in the green sheet this week angelo hank who grew up in San Francisco went to galileo and played at Stanford University oriented the one hand shop and one jump shop basketball everyone throw the ball understated footed and second thing is scott wiener supervisor wiener as initiated discussion of a master plan for subways for the future of San Francisco which is long overdue it smells were doing things push and pull and even if the funding is not there for this type of thing important to have a blue print that considers where the best places are were a dense small city and every other dense small city in the world as transit in its own rightofway sproirp and were having this expedition between buses and pedestrians and cars on the surface we need a plan im no total agreement of what hes talking about and third article recently heard that there was going to be an auction foyer parcel f which was a transbay parcel that hoped to bring up to 200 million in an open option a day or two before a number thought possible are parties that were going to do bid pulled out of the auction one reason state theres fear about not getting an entitlement after paying a couple of Million Dollars for a parcel the fear of prop m limitations you might be stuck with something with in entitlement or detailed quite a few of the years we have to address this soon bus as youve read we need a lot more for the transbay terminal to be competed and well need considering more in the terms of billion dollars to have the are transbay the extension from caltrans to the terminal to make it whole this funding it is important and weve Good Neighbor policy got to be able to relieve the fear and come up with a solution a prop m increase obviously before the voters with consideration. I know the to the be careful youre not supporting a measure. I dont think there was that measures this is somethings before us the proclaiming discussion so. Prop m. Okay. Okay. Well anyway long story short we need to deal with this issue in the future thats my comments. Commissioner richards. A couple of things i saw the advanced calendar and on october 15th a market octavia you want i want to weve been talking about the eastern neighborhoods update and maybe we mixed them up or the eastern neighborhoods is coming up on the calendar maybe a eastern neighborhoods versus market octavia. Theyre both on there. Anybody understand what a ted egon report is is it out. Yep. It is out not in its final form but a graft not issued the final report yet. As soon as he does well get it to you. Will we see the draft id like to take a look a couple of things weve getting gotten a couple of letters in relationship in the long meetings the ones that go 12 hours i think two or three letters the gist we sit here all day and a lot of people fall off and leave by the time we get to hear the project and not the due process of getting up here and speaking its been hours and hours and hours another question one wrote can we budget the meetings maybe a goal of normal eight or ten hours to try to manage the time it brultd i think sitting up here when the air conditioning is off and making an informed decision maybe this is something this commission or is rules committee to have a time management two or three other quick unrelated things weve heard about change happening in the city and we always bemoan the fact this and that place closed and others eagle closed but the rezoning question how much did you effect it they say i used to go once every x number of months my response how can they stay in business with the costs this past week we have the hotel buffet and sunday no longer the demand fell off for the hundred dollars brunch not enough people going so hard question i asked my friends they personally for me since 1997 so you start putting those things together youll have to frequent those place to for them to stay in business the intersection for the arts has a show 925 mission the 5 m project opened until october 15th and i havent been there this is a really, really great project great thing to look at it is the face of neighborhood were actually approving project go to the october 18th and lastly interesting best in class example up in palm springs i was in a rental property for a week when we showed up at the door was the Good Neighbor policy i think perhaps well put one together for whatever form of rental units the first one was no music in the backyard we actually abated by the rules and those houses saying no shorelines we can look at it and have a part of the program when people registration for shortterm rentals. Thank you. Commissioner moore. I received a letter regarding the lateness of our meetings the comment i like to add i think we have to anytime to ourselves we get tired with having to sit here and do equal justice for each project in terms of preparation and when it comes to 8 oclock and 11 oclock and 12 oclock for important calendar items coming late it is physically impossible mentally improbable to be totally on top of it i want us to humbly anytime admit and spread the meetings apart so we can indeed do justice for everything improvements of us the second point it is in rebuttal to commissioner antoninis comment or illumination to his comment the parcel f in transbay is protected through the transcript planning effort its the fact the parcel did not the rest a bid cosit down with the market in china that rightfully made people aware it happened on the same day people had a right to the fact they felt uncertain relative to the advancement of what theyre doing this that is a direct effect on their decision not uncertainties about the process the processes in transbay and are clear and not impediment by what we do. Im glad you guys brought up the length of the last meeting it taxes us not being fair to the public the public knows the president and Vice President and the Commission Secretary meet once a week to try to set out the advanced calendar we try not to let them fall off things get extended we try to make the time with certain items whenever possible im curious in video simulation to the Public Comment have been tried. Oh. Thats before us in november i think. Okay. Im open to sharing i think we are open to hearing other genocides. Commissioner antonini. One thing that may be helpful we try to do this have as many hearings ahead of the decision date to allow the Public Comments and project sponsors and hopefully ma many of the issues will be resolved before we come up for the final decision is it doesnt always happen but certain whenever possible to have multiple habeas corpus hearing on projects. Commissioner johnson. Thank you for commenting just on the item yeah. I definitely agree that is challenging were here for 12 hours and sharp at noon as midnight i know one thing weve got you know brown act and obviously want to hear the Public Comment but not only having multiple hearings but also better advertising and shrinking around the organized approval i think if people knew that was there ive supposedly spoken to an activist maybe 10 to 20 minutes or something might allow us to actually with good conscious to limit Public Comment in some instances i know weve had to do with at skwoeshg agency we didnt have the room after 4 oclock there have times i had to curtail Public Comment or maybe strengthening the orientation and advertising that might help 3 hours ever Public Comment on one item we want to hear all the voices but again, a practice outlet issue. Commissioners, if theres nothing further we can move on to Department Matters announcements. Two items one to mention you may have seen the press release on vorlz kim ill miss in the department the new director of that office i want to say that official office is staffed by 3 members of the Planning Department whove been working on register and the City Administrators Office those folks will be in the Planning Department open is fist floor and just as last wee week we had 6 hundred and 80 rentals so the members of the public who are interested in doing vorlz no waiting on appointments you get an appointment next day for shortterm rental weve up to 6 hundred and 20 registrations for a well be having a hearing on the academy of the eir but more specifically a discussion about the process for bringing projects to once the eir is certified so think about the option well present you with some option how we structure the various approvals whether gop geograph or types of buildings whatever well give you those option on october 1st and generate a discussion objective cant bring all the projects at the same time that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Commissioner moore. Director ram could you perhaps add shorelines were a little bit more prepared with the other to bunch together an outline how to organize we can look at ideas that would be great a form of what youre trying to do. Commissioners, if theres nothing further well move on on top of to item 8 past events of the board of supervisors and the Historic Preservation commission didnt meet yesterday. Hi commissioners the board returned from its break, however, monday was a holiday legislative aide didnt meet district 8 and 3 adu legislation had its second reading and passed the conditional use authorization for the designated units in c3 sponsored by madam chair rosales and supervisor kim and supervisor mar that was reheard because of the drafting error and signed by the mayor on august 6th didnt include all the projects but the board reconsidered and it passed on its First Reading this week and finally, the accessory use entertainment south of market districts also received its First Reading that allows the limited live performers in the g district it was heard on july 16th and voted to unanimously recommend approval the board passed it unanimously on the First Reading 3 introductions the cocorrections ordinance this commission heard on august 16th and introduced by the mayor and then the jewish home planning Code Amendment and general plan were also introduced that concludes my remarks. Commissioners well move on to general Public Comment this time, members of the public may address the commission items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the commission up to three minutes. I do have sincerely speaker cards. Okay. Georgia calling names . Good afternoon, commissioners im back again with my alterations that are demoed this one i showed you previously can i have the overhead on commissioner mccarthys street the original house and there was this spring another picture this spring thats how it was a long time ago, i didnt look at it until yesterday there it is and it is ironic ive learned this particular site pertains to something you have later on in the day ill save that for later again, i know that is difficult to ascertain what this is to me when i showed you those pictures going from that to this as i showdown showed it overhead please by any common sense definition that is a demolition especially, as it started with that granted people may have issues but you know it still a demolition the other thing i want to say is that maybe this is a trend maybe on out liar i found this notice hanging up in noah valley a noah valley startup a noah valley startup what is that going to be it occurred to me you know those large projects with four and five bedrooms and space downstairs is people tired of riding the buses i dont know it is just a one of maybe something maybe nothing but it struck me on the happier note here is a project that was done at 7 or 8 years ago on 26 theres the original building i was printing it off of google now here it is today that is a very nice remodel i point out because im interested in what happens to the residential Design Guidelines that fits in the neighborhood not overly magnificent and out of scale and cpr that is staff with the Residential Design Team i this that would be nice from the public had a workshop with the staff 8 years ago when you were working on dr reform so thank you very much. Any other Public Comment of the names weve called . Good afternoon, commissioners im john taco group i want to follow up on the discussion last week about t5 m where we agree with the cam components is that development of this site is going to very definitely accelerate or approval accelerate gentrification of the 6th street neighborhood it will go faster because of 5 m that matters how big the project in your opinion the as of right the 6 hundred square feet is just as damaging in terms of gentrification as the proposed project to be succinct the first 6 hundred feet kills the neighborhood because it it will have the you know the highend housing it it will have the tech offices and the; isnt that so i didnt hip bars and thats the transformation that causes gentrification of a district whether 4 hundred or 6 million feet or the 1. 2 million promoted about trigger that so for us the important questions what does the project include to counter that how much to counter it and the key standards weve set with them weve talked about will it do much more than the favorable inclusionary or little 33 city policy or not will it in particular provide new sites for Affordable Housing because in look at doerdz the hardest thing is not the money but the land the site and because 5 m is making available that parcel on Mission Street for Affordable Housing they will contribute something important we have no other way to get the other big issue does it help us build the future neighborhood well have after gentrification when the only diversity is found in the permanently Affordable Housing and the affordable pdr space and so on the new Community Park the integral park felt 5 m project is vi