On yerba buena. Thank you. Commissioner antonini. Yeah. A few things on the project one reason he find it xooerldz everybody mentioned the 73. 5 million of contributions theres no reason to go 0 into each with an but 12 million to transit people are concerned we need a lot of funding for childcare and schools and Workforce Development areas not small amounts 3, 5, 710 millions and doubled the open space which is very impressive and even if you consider the chronicle building is probably around half of that i dont know the breakdown maybe a little bit less or more but providing the prments opinion in the mary court area and the other open space maybe the relative of this project taking 8 years how everything is scripted to minimize the wind and allow as much sun into the open space im in favor of the building and the office space is a logical place it fits into the tower separation issues as well as the winds and the shadow issues so i think this is extremely well designs and very much in favor the project. Commissioner richards. Weve heard about youth and families and overlay i pulled the legislation that authorized it but it said it is intended to extend the Affordable Housing in the area so i think were covered 33 percent over a code compliant project would do in residential it is to protect and enhance the environment by adopting the policies like the conditional use authorization as we saw for several types of incapable use with youth and family and also something that was struck some legislation around the mixed legislation for the families 2, 3, 4 bedrooms is 80 requirement it is a question would be does this development and the zoning amendment add ulcer up if you looked at what i said on the lapsing how does the project conform any special cruz i know were getting rid of the youth and family sud are we replacing it with replying. Commissioner richards on the parcel in the sud. On the parcels in the proposed 5 m suds. Were not getting rid of suds itself. The answer is the project would comply with the family youth and sud one in that it is seeking conditional use authorization from this body it is riders weve talked about earlier it applies, and, secondly, it will steady the affordable standards with respect to the mix and perhaps mr. Richie can answer this is units mix requirement that was alluded didnt exist in todays sud and the mix of the do we know the proposed index is there any idea how many family sized units. Defer to mr. Guy. So ultimately ores those are to be determined tare built into the advisory committee. A minimum of 4 units per floor that suggests i would suggest that you know trying to achieve a minimum ledge the benefits of the location in particular i dont know if so sponsor has any more thoughts contractually evolves in response to the conditions that at a given time sure before we ask the project sponsor i have another question if i wanted to open up on to liquor or arcade would i need a cu. I believe then we would be looking at the fleeing controls of the district. With respect to the use types so. Are ball park arcades koofrdz. I think the adults entertainment maybe considered most of concern in terms of incapable will require and cu i can do research. Im interested show your im sure forest city is interested in making this project with incapable used with the less than desirable i want to make sure were not allowing that to the project sponsor your other developments largescale developments i dont know if wu you what are you planning here. We have estimated the units for n one is 4 hundred units if you took the gross Square Footage that is targeting 1, 2, 3 building the n or 1930 two is some 3 but the jean unit mix in the m2 we modeled after the controls of octavia and minimum of San Francisco bedrooms. Great this is something i think if we want to make a motion i want to include that and one others question eave met and not to have formula retail youre trying to serve the locally owned businesses would i object if we asked for a formula retail use. Not obtain. One other questions he apologize this come up in conversations with the folks in the communities a childcare facility have i considered that. Were looking at a childcare facility some open space requirements relayed inform certain areas a sfoesht we need to work through the technical issues were looking at that for the n one building somewhat in the works. Thank you another question i have or thought it goes with the great work the department do thank you very much i think this is i might have one question later i have a lot of notes to commissioner Johnsons Point an interest in the Small Business and the possibility displacement i want to make sure maybe mr. Sick and tired and staff also try to do a consensus so we have a lane to or baseline is it the tech space noted pdr is this in the c3 district. Along housing street commissioner thats right. I believe that is not r s d. Is so if at the point to come back no issue with that. No. Okay. Transportation im going over the bucket list from the last 5 meeting he this look at the traffic simulation it looked at really good i had fears of the backs up and im not seeing to was perfect but showing some of the back ups we the deliveries bans the rate im comfortable and referencing the letter that the city sent not not eir there was 12 million coming for transportation and pedestrian improvements and the mid block called the pork chop has a good effect on the simulation the parking were talking about the transit corridor muni and bart thats the parking ratio for residents yeah. Peter so i have to back up ive worked closely the parking is one for two; right . Thats c3. The cu up to a. 75. Excellence that the related to the preservation was chosen i was in the dumpster and the chronicle building not a registered landmark we traded density building spread over the area for height that loud 0 us to the preservation alternatives he supported i think were creating 44 thousand square feet of open space and parks on the fifths floor we will see and high line was used that an example and project sponsor im taking a leap of faith about the responsibility of chronicle building in the programming and planning of it where who owns that is it the project sponsor or in the Development Agreement. The programming and the planning the open spaces the chronicle building is owned by the project sponsor and the programming will be done by the project sponsor. Any programming or decides by forests city based on the data theyve gather. I think the forest is open to the Community Input on open space for the and great that might be part of the recommendations. One the speakers handed in a rather ominous looking molds where the shadows will fall other than the open space here this one caught me do and we have a shadows simulation what that looks like . I just wanted to familiarize and thats part of the shadow online that focuses on our side as well and part of the urban planning of the site to make sure that we were getting good particularly in midday getting good sun and but those are Available Online we may have it here and id love to have you show it. Okay. The communities and Public Benefits overwhelm going over those are good things clearly there is a doubling of the mopes that will be reaccompanied for the sud 73 theres 11 and a half Million Dollars fee one the recommendations he would make that at least the Stabilization Funds that represents the communities take into account that and offer recommendations how that is spent or prioritized my council would that be something you folks are open to . I guess staffs recommendation is as appointed by one the commissions that falls into the category of communities benefit is in the land use relayed bases we know that the board of supervisors is likely to get its own thoughts and tweaks to this i think well recommend that the rip two the stabilization and the Community Benefits is thought throughout the board of supervisors level rather than at this level and make that recommendation and the public and the communities can weigh in on that one the items that came up many, many times is the filipino Cultural Heritage district i know that San Francisco heritage submitted an estimate own what that takes they price at 3 hundred k that covered with the speakers were talking about understanding hire a component and dynamically it and coming up with recommendations he think we talked about this polish the project sponsor was in favor in excluding that in the fee schedule you want ill exclude that in the motion another question that came up was phasing the construction we talked about that but also not only the buildings but the buildings and the amenities how does that work . I know we have 3 buildings you having can go abc and amenities that council with that. Some general points the Development Agreement and the d for d and sud have been craft to look at the 3 major New Buildings and to take all the communities benefits whether physical or monetary and tie them specifically to every building is specific and this is in our exhibit b either d or e it is list in the exhibit and very clear which amenities go with what building we dont dictate the orders or say you have to build the buildings 19 this not our first rodeo we dont believe to say to the developer build them or force them to build the building we believe the best way to tie the benefits to the buildings but not to dictate the order find buildings and weve made clear the major housing piece at eddy and there will it is the first building out does that answer your question. It does thank you i know you are commission met with a study i dont know if someone is here from the artist we heard from the people that said they are not part of conversation can anyone comment on that a woman an 6th street how will the organization be able to participate in this benefit. From cast the executive director that spoke the unique part of cast we didnt select angle Artists Organization to occupy the building we selected an Arts Organization that is at the beginning of reaching out to the community and determining the best and most supportive way to integrate and have this building open forecast in their process theyll very much do a communities eccentric progress that starts that conversation you know at starting point so that will happen over the coming months as the project develops and it satisfies me coming to the most important piece well within to me may not be to everybody the grant i won Million Dollars applause grant i ask for additional money for public use mr. Rich. I just wanted to comment ive heard that concern from you and others so we have been one Million Dollars in the Development Agreement 3 hundred or so is actually to come earlier than the first building we call finally grant the legal term which the project sponsor has not subject to a lawsuit and the next remaining 7 hundred thousand comes with the fierce building what our desire is to do because they have a long road with a long term permit restoration we would like to use that money towards the long terms restoration the building were aware the building needs four or 500,000 we have a source i cant announce it but from the next few weeks ill to commit to if we gets short term needs funded without touching the Million Dollars if that didnt work well use part of the Million Dollars to take that initial work get it duplicate and confident we wont need to get the building fixed up. Thats fantastic now to the most important item were the Affordable Housing displacement in terms of understanding where we are today we have a map that is slightly imperfect it was tossed into the computer ms. Hester had feedback but publish the map and have it as good as we can to measure the effect of any potential displacement or other issues well hear next week neighborhoods preference ive taekd talked with many hay wood theres recent a preference for ellis acted and preference for people 90 no fault seeks he building the ratio in terms of the neighborhoods preferences it is close to 35 percent from the neighborhoods 0 that makes me feel more comfortable i hear commissioner wus point about privately owned sros they really their stabilized but not sold solid as concrete and to the tracking buyouts were doing everything we can to understand what the effect of those issues we know interest is going to be some displacement, in fact, i think mr. Obtaining link said those projects will increase the rates of increase if anyone else heard that node our head and offers 43 percent of air force one of the other comment i have on this project pulling it together believe the revengeful or risk is too great not to move forward and also i think the risk is too great not to have an insurance policy and all of a sudden 10 years later the neighborhoods changes that is akin to in the mission 50 percent down to 38 percent latinos one of the things i want to talk about ill ill see what my fellow commissioners have to say well have a recommendation from the board of supervisors to create a Stabilization Fund can manage not only the baseline data but more proactive and react testify if displacement is happening the mentioned the ted egon report could be different and small and he immediate half hour mile this was ether a mission a larger area but the insurance or insurance policy is a good idea and commissioner Johnsons Point recommend Something Like that be recommended i read the charter for the selma stabilization it nailed it from funds and rincon hill provided for the selma for those kinds of things id like to make a motion to approve the zoning text amendments to the requester 40 request for height to the zoning map t h1, to recommend two i recommend the design for development to j the approval of Development Agreement to k the allocation of Square Footage under the annual Development Program for offices at 5 hundred and 93 plus square feet and the allocation to Square Footage under the office Elimination Program of one hundred to m the conditional use authorization for establishing 15th and Mission Street to demolition the 22 m the language in there to n the conditional use to convert 40 thousand square feet of office uses, etc. To o the conditional use for partially gosh the 3 hundred and plus for 8 thousand plus east bay the authorization for 25 storage not to reach a maximum for a health of 395 feet plus to q the conditional use authorization for project to construct a roof height of 2 hundred feet plus 2 hundred and 88 dwelling units and 58 square feet of retail and 44 gross square feet of lobby with the addition of one the 300,000 funds for the encouragement and heritage district for the to be read by the project sponsor and 3 assuming whatever is not in the c3 controls for capable use those get bit in under and the arresting cads, etc. Phil the gap which exists on the c3 and what wear members of the commission to the Development Agreement recommend to the board of supervisors now on recommendation to the board of supervisors to create a Stabilization Fund for displacement and businesse
vimarsana.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.