Add the sunshine ordnance has made comments to that effect in the board agrees to move the section that will be fine. A i. I. The is have it. Ladies and gentlemen, were going to move the agenda around and go to immediately to item 11 and back to the Court Reporting directors report so actually mr. Chairman before we move on im required to announce agenda no closed session that communication having been directed to call item lovingly immediately item 11 is supporting the revisions to the Pilot Program limiting it to one year requiring a 6 month and cap the loading sown eurozone for more efficient zoning and this monitoring the air quality at the individual locates and a study on the possible impacts of the commuter shuts off and others factors on the displacement directors staff has asked the board to consider an amendment to the resolution it is the resolve clause that states resolve that the director of transportation will commission a study on the shuttle and others displacement they request your consideration of on amendment it will state above grade to separate from the moechgs on the program described above the sfmta board to say a study of the relationship between transportation programs commuter shuttles and you housing costs with an analysis of all others conceptually factors for displacement that is a motion theyve offend. Should we put that up there first. No mr. Chairman ill suggest you hear the staff comments and then consider the amendments and then the items in this the amendment passes. Mr. Maguire. Good afternoon director the motion before you reflects the direction you gave us as staff on february 2nd asking us to consider potential changes to the Shuttle Program to address the issues raised the board of supervisors or by the board of supervisors and the ceqa appellants the motion we wrote the language reflected our consultation with the Shuttle Program and the supervisors and the comments on this topic we think that is a this resolution represents a step forward to a Shuttle Program that meets all the concerns due to the ceqa laws. Thank you we have members of the public. Yes. Mr. Chairman several members of the public calling names . Those are the first 3 speakers. Good afternoon. Im osie with the charm the neighborhood o over 2. Households in noah valley some are here in support id like to ask you to consider more we need more i doable that prioritization of public fapgs is good for the bay area or our countrys i believe not only those measures those recommendations should be implemented but also we need the study how many people are riding the shurltsdz not two a long time the companies offend mini advances for carpools what happens were now replaced them that are including the streets and wrecking our infrastructure at no cost to the companies what i hope that the studies that will come out of this commission out of this board would point to the fact that we need to have better Public Transportation and this at least we need a hub for those shuttles the people that are riding the shutters are not attributing to the Public Transportation and infrastructure that the city is spending money on and have to spend money to so for the have added population ill encourage and urge you to you vote yes on those revisions in addition to more measures more studies to help replacing the shuttles what Public Transportation it is much needed for our very much. Next speaker, please. calling names . Hello good afternoon my name is kathy i live in noah valley i work with a Large Coalition called the anti Displacement Coalition and also work with noah valley tenant and charm so you know the anti displacement map project last year been two years a thorough analysis where the good morning buses were going 60 percent of no fault evictions were within the shuttle stops it make sense a brilliant idea hubs where last year diesel shuttles communitybased organization and sending them downtown make sense that is not a matter of faster than but we have to remember theyll be two more google campus one maybe under construction in the valley and so this means thousands and thousands of workers where will they live for one thing and how to get there i was thinking from the hubs materialized lets hope they do there will be bike accomodation you know young people are riding bikes the city and the tech workers will fit that model and the 09 pocketed cesar chavez i live there and reggie walk to the church e. R. Bart to get where im going im 75 years old so we cant go on those things are huge white ghosts and really kind of creepy something is off about there is enormous compared to the city buses and wearing down the asphalt on the streets the streets will be a mess and in need of repair so thank you, very much for listening and hope you adopt those important amendments. Next speaker, please. calling names . Good evening im bob plant hold one of the named appellants to the appeal to the board of supervisors that generated it they to can he railroad i support of suggestions and ask you to add that it is important to address the concerns that have been miss stated by some the media our appeal is not to get rid of of the program it is to make sure the pro program is safe for all not just workable for the shutter yours but for muni passersby for San Francisco pedestrians weve sent you photographs over the past few months documenting situations where muni buses are not able to pull in with the shuttle is blocking the bus zone on the muni bus has to be if a traffic lane and sent you that over the period of time it is not just once occasionally throughout the city that is relevant because we want you to know this Program Needs to be made savor this didnt address anything like the questioning the legitimate or the nonliquidity under the section of why there was a quick exception as opposed to the least providing for the analysis a negative declaration the idea is that the Pilot Program youve authorized to run to the end of the year it was cut short nevertheless of the Data Analysis that pushed for what you approved as a Permanent Program and again, even though state law says thats illegal you dont have a data for the rainy period for december and for people people with disabilities so push through that resolution please. Thank you. Next speaker, please. calling names . Good afternoon decorations my name is john im a member the alamo Square Association and the Society Member of the hayes valley a resident on has a street near which there are several pickup and drops off my constructive analysis of commuting down the peninsula ive used car and bikes to do much i feel this proposal recommendation by the board of supervisors which is also the board of ss c articulation is sound and meets all the needs of the people on commuter shuttles and the residents in the Community Near it it meets the needs that were 10u7b8d impressed e expressed by alamo square to not allow double decker i tourists around the square the commuter shuttles at the same dimensions as the tourist buses going through alamo square those points ill share with you my general pardon me absolute support of this recommendation and the amendments for we two Work Together to develop an effect route to continuity to and from San Francisco you know about to open up a new apple haerltdz 13 thousand people will be working for Apple Incorporated other fork of People Living in San Francisco and needing to travel mrs. Support this recommendations from the board of supervisors. Thank you, sir next item, please. calling names . Thank you. Im a behaving e paiveng the resolution contains 10 specific items your resolution only incorporates 6 omitting the recovery of costs, fundamentally enforcement and large vehicles should be restricted on smaller streets and requiring cleaner emissions the calendaring memo attached to the resolution second to the last bullet point director reiskin can bring back the program for consideration on march first, the conditions stopped by saying the pending appeal have been roved the the bupz didnt include that you should direct the sustainable streets hub to bring back to this body with thirty days timeline with it should have recommended in august of 2014 as i testified here on february 2nd the news state ceqa guidelines my require an eir were concerned with safety protection for vulnerable pedestrians clearly a hub based approach for the shuttle will provide that for vulnerable pedestrians and the second whereas clause the resolution states that an extensive analysis was conducted a categorically untrue you must know the data presented in november covered 2014 to 2015 but omitted 38 of the remaining seven months data you need to direct the sustainable streets. Thank you thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. calling names . Good afternoon im doug i represent 12 thousand teamsters the city and county of San Francisco and one hundred thousand in Northern California to be frank im a little bit frustrated to, here on this issue like many things in San Francisco this seems to be a referendum on much bigger issues and i dont want to make light of the issues of Affordable Housing and gentrification and income and equality the role of the tech factor in those issues were right there on the sharing those concerns, however, i would say that maybe some people are paint two aboard a brush and attacking tech we can point to works of facebook and apple and Others Companies that are getting a piece of pie and doing something to address the equality by organizing our unions so the one thing that everyone agrees on this in actuation is the importance of labor harmony pieced i want to thank the mta for sticking to that and just to remind i as discussion and debate about the program for us there needs to be a program that the users of the shuttle support and the Tech Companies without a program we cant fill the harmony labor component thank you very much next item, please. calling names . Good afternoon ms. Taylor im fran among other things a retired member of the graphical communication workers of america and just to echo the concerns of the brother before me support the drivers and want to make their drivers easier not driving the monsters down the small residential streets they sort of attract this hatred and not directed at the drivers theyre doing their jobs on the system you have control over that i support 24 to create the hutchings that will make everybody happier unless youre a person that has been given everything you want muni forward i support basically has initiated stop xhoelsz weve seniors have to washer favorite and it failures the grid system we center to transfer more why are we having to the tier system where muni riders have to transfer and keep one seat ride for mostly young and ableled bodies downtown or wherever the hubs and those buses ive seen the number of buses theyre not full and it will be much more efficient to fill up a bus and leave full you could have fewer buses i dont want to getting get rid of of buses but will be easier to navigate the streets. Thank you. Next speaker, please. calling names . Good afternoon good afternoon i support the one year hub analysis and the housing studies the bay area study supports this Scale Program and licks the less impact on the neighborhood and by supporting the neighborhood freeway system youll be able to move all the people in a this manner and appropriately now i think you need to Due Diligence to understand what im talking about you need to on co. To 24th street and church between 7 oclock in the morning and obviously the 20 plus commuter buses that transverse that intersection with the 48 that are operating on 20 sdrarlz they and theyre not time theyre one minute apart and bunch in gaps and you ought to see the congestion on 24th street i cant express any frustration and have the garbage trucks once or twice a week and the delivery trucks if you want to understand how well, that is thoughtout the Bay Area Council and see how its committed stand with me on 24th street and church youll understand the magnitude of the impact on those streets that youve got buses that make right turns that slows down everything go to 24th street and castro and 0 see those buses the a. M. And p. M. Youll understand i dont understand how we couldnt have had a eir at the beginning of this program with the delays and xhoej in noah valley i want to express my opinion to Due Diligence and see you at 24th street and church. Thank you. Next speaker, please. calling names . Good afternoon. This motivator matter was twice before the board of supervisors we could see from the Planning Department and those representing the mta that they were favoring the buses that are not muni buses and if youre especially overseeing who represent the physically challenges and the elderly if you dont represent the constituents of San Francisco then it is time for you not to be sitting here weve seen there this through the Taxi Commission that is about the precautionary principle which im sure none of you have read so the precautionary principle that is law states that adverse impacts to evaluate what is happening and youve havent done that so are the to meetings weve had at the board of supervisors a lot of us clearly stating what should be done but what you are all doing playing pingpong we dont have time to waste you say your time is precious we be our time is precious im here to state that that you are analytic the seniors lay our lines on the roads so youll get a clear message dont think im blue river again and again again, we see when we and you have to Work Together to help those who most need help you shove them to the side that will for the be reported to im not bluffing im not bluffing someone should form a committee to see the adverse impacts on the seniors and the exchanged next item, please. calling names who is the last person to turn in a speaker card. Timber. Hello tom through the south beach apartments considering this started as a give away a corporate give away with whatever they wanted to do they could do the shorted monument it is obviously we need a home based system for what weve got going the waste only the streets are going to be easier if it is a week street system to tell us which one will break first, because of the extra weight i dont like the idea were adding diesel we should be reducing diesel hubs, of course, those buses should not be leafing until their full and shouldnt be waiting and shouldnt be dropping off one or two people and driving on the streets on a third of the bus open their last stop the overhead i dont think how much time i have 51 seconds a. Everyone is stepping off a bus should have a muni fast pass if they board at the bus stop or get off were taking a little bit of money and sharing it with muni thank you for that one a plan to make all the buses wheelchair assessable should be implemented immediately the buses should find a little bit of hubs we dont need the they should be able to board muni aprons waiting going their direction within the city especially they your honor, return to San Francisco thank you for your time. Next speaker, please. calling names . Those are the last to people that turned in speaker cards. Good afternoon. Good afternoon Committee Members im tonys work with the senior and gakt action we work with seniors and people with disabilities, transportation is part of overall quality of life focus or lens, if you will, that we look at in advocating for the people that we serve the buses provide or they pose many different issues particularly i would say at the other most issues of safety ive seen big buses the neighborhoods their cumbersome and quite frankly they seem to be out of place the idea of the straddle hub or where the younger Technology Worker can come and take those bikes and come and take the busses to their employment is practice than the buses that cause more congestion the neighborhood particularly noah valley neighborhood you know you see where folks have gotten into near misses you know taking tech shuttle buses and people inconventions by stopping that is farther done than their regular City Attorney stop that is a safety hazard some folks dont know where their at and it exasperates congestion that is already there ill just try to convey to you the seniors and the people with disabilities we make up a large part of population here in San Francisco and aging in place is something as a city that is a policy that we try to locate seriously and transportation being a big part next item, please. calling names the last speaker card. Hi seiu 10 to one thank you for having us. Board of supervisors board of directors i want to recognize the work of the supervisors and the work of our staff at mta coming together the last two weeks and discussing the aspects of this permanent time program look to low and behold i want you know, i think there is sill still two outstanding issues the board of supervisors will look at we can exhaustive improve to address the riders and sfmta i look forward and hope you adopt the resolution that drafts some of the concerns moving temporarily fast forward what are the alternatives you know do we have just those stops or hubs do we have a combination how to deal with moving forward could we get more white sdwoenz a combination of things as well what are the other mitigations with other concerns youve obviously seen the community and others raise both enforcement and pulling up the shuttle buse