Everyone needs team to see what happened on the 25th of august against the dra that was provided yesterday. I ask that the Planning Commission differ action on this and put it on the calendar for next week. Thank you very much. [gavel] okay. Last call for Public Comment on the minutes. Seeing no additional request to speak, Public Comment on the minutes is closed and they are before you commissioner commissioner field. Yes, in terms of the draft minutes for the 45 bernard and there is the language on action number two that is it seems like because we had a lot of deliberation in terms of the rent control or deed and the future for the for the future tenant and in effective order evictions and what we would like the project sponsor, i know that you know, of course, were not in the purview of the rent board but the something settled and the Commission Recognizes the rent indiscernible and because theres a lot of deliberation, i think the expectations need to be spelled out even though it does recognize the rights of the rent board, so that its clear also for the project sponsor. There were some discussion that after three years when the owner after the owner moves out that they will do a Due Diligence to reaching out to tenants and also are we also had a discussion that in when the tenants are being offered to come back that their rent will be based on the same rent that they left. That may be something, i feel something that we need to look on in the wording and i look at the City Attorney how to word that more effectively instead of recognizing the rights of the tenant. And thats why perhaps it may need more time with more spelled out language. Thank you, commissioner imperial. I would like to add this case is important to us, not only as 45 bernard as exemplary for other similar situations and since the applicant developer is from out of town, theres a degree of potential room for misunderstanding that should be addressed in just residing what the rules are. This particular in response because there were many other technical issues where i felt that the developer applicant and the person in construction didnt know much about dbi and the subtleties of how its interpreted in our city so its helpful for us to have it spelled out. Theres nothing lost and nothing inappropriate about it. In addition to that, i feel the request made about removing the spiral stay on the roof deck doesnt explain what we were asking for the replacement of the open space in form of a porch which by minimum needs to be one hundred square feet and a little bit more which requires setting back of the front wall, the south facing wall by nine feet roughly speaking, so thats easy to do. Nothing lost and were not making the conditions harder and were interpreting them but we want it spelled out. Its in your departments interest when it comes to follow up and avoiding misunderstands. Anybody else on the commissioners . I do not see her on the commissioner ruiz, is there anything you want to add . There she is. I didnt see your name. Thats okay. I think, commissioner imperial and yourself, commissioner moore really explained what my concerns were in regard to number two in the accent and wanting to add what commissioner imperial said. It was more than just recognizing rent control laws in San Francisco but really trying to encourage the project sponsor to law because we as a city, we dont have much account ability and measure in place and follow through to ensure that happens so i wanted to reiterate the protections for the current tenant and the expectation if the owner were to move out, what were expecting as a city in regard to following the rent control ordinance and the rent board in terms of offering the unit to the previous tenants that were interested at the rent they were paying when evicted so really spelling that out because i dont see that in the actions as is, so i would be supportive of deefr f of deferring this for a for a week and coming back. Its a time when we deliberated on the subject matter and i think that has not been clearly delineated in what has been written, thank you. Certainly commission, as we can review the video with what was stated and the motion that was made and then forward you all an updated version. Action memo that might include a better, uh, better capture of what your motion was. Commissioner, do we need a motion to continue the meeting minutes. I think we should continue these minutes, yes. It will be continued to next week or if you need more time . Well, we can certainly continue it until next week and if its not ready at that time, we can continue it yet again. Okay. Okay. Move to continue the adoption of the minutes of august 25th, oh, not august 25th. Yeah. Was it august 25th . Yeah. September 15th. September it says here, august 25th for some reason on my paper but they are the august 25th minutes. Your motion is continue them to september 15th. Yeah. To september 15th, yeah. Move to adopt, move to continue the adoption of minutes to september 15th. Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion then to continue adoption of the minutes for august 25th to september 15th. Commissioner ruiz . Aye. Commissioner diamond . No. Commissioner imperial . Aye. Commissioner koppel . Aye. Commissioner moore . Aye. So moved commissioners, that motion passes 4 to 1 with commissioner diamond voting against. It will mace you under commission comments and questions. Commissioner imperial . You go ahead first if you want. Okay. Yeah, i just want to bring up in terms of and it looks like our items for the rest of the year are letting less and less. I kind of want to have a better picture of what the rest of the year is going to look like for us and i understand there are some continuances that, you know, im worried that we are beyond the ten cancellation sessions and whether you know, how whether is this because of the less items were having, the continuances so i know some of the members of the public have contacted me about what is going on and so, i would like to bring this up in terms of how is the rest of the year, our calendar looks like . And how were in terms of the continuances, what are the reasons for those continuances . Uhhuh. Well, theres a variety of reasons for continuances. And the advanced calendar provides you an indication of what we know so far about our future calendars. Im not sure i mean, just to jump in, commissioner, youre right. Theres less weve got less fewer cases in front of the commission. I mean, you know, our volume is down and thats now translating to less, fewer items before you here at the commission, so yes. That could lead i think, jonas works with the chair to figure out how to be most efficient in scheduling these meetings and if we have backtoback meeting was few items, perhaps we talked about consolidating them but its up to the Commission Chair to cancel meetings if there arent enough items or we want to consolidate items. I guess im trying to see if were expecting more cancellations for the rest of the year. Were seeing less activity, so again, you can meet and hear one item at dr if you want to or we can work with the Commission President to try and consolidate meetings if thats more efficient so ultimately its up to you. Okay. Yeah. Thats good to know. It would make sense for all of us to think about it and calendar as a discussion item because we cannot go back and forth on opine on what each individual feels about it at the moment. They are definitely from my perspective, a number of bigticket items. They are from my perspective a number of bigticket items that people ask repeatedly to hear more about. One of them being the Housing Element. Why is it scheduled on a regular schedule. Having regular discussions would be helpful because were getting challenges from sacramento left and right and not to get into the particular balances you have been involved but for us to be up to speed and prepared to take a consequential step next spring, it would make sense to spread interim working meetings so to say into the calendar. Sure. And again, if we would calendar a discussion for everybody to weigh in, think about it, hear what the public says, each of us has a different exposure, i think it would help. Okay. Also may i speak. In materials of the, as what commissioner moore or vicepresident commissioner moore mentioned, like, i know that we are or the city or the Planning Department is in discussion with the hcd in terms of they are looking into or investigating about entitlement process, perhaps thats something we can have informational session about those discussions as well or update as the Planning Department having those kind of conversation and i think for the commission, we need to be updated as well in those conversations. Yeah. And we just, so you know, weve got that calendar for the 29th of this month. We dont have the answers to hcd yet but we wanted to talk about you about what they are asking for and what their comments were to our Housing Element and get your feedback and comments back, so you know, it will be more an update on where hcd is going in the process, legs or response to hcd because were in the mist of formulating that but we wanted your initial feedback on that. Yeah, thank you very much. Yeah. Schedule them and the meeting was helpful because many questions were continual Historic Preservation which is making important decisions on cultural district statements and et cetera would be helpful and even meetings and new commissioners and yeah. Commissioners, if im hearing you correctly, we should add the advanced calendar as i topic for next weeks agenda . Please very good. Just, we may want to wait until we have a full complement of commissioners back because they may have continues as well. That doesnt mean we couldnt kickoff a light discussion just to toss out ideas and you get to think about it. Id like to make another commissioner comment. Im sure you read it, but since im now in my second meeting leading the the land acknowledgement, it struck me as very moving that oakland plans to allow Indigenous Group to use five acres of city land. The first one in california. The city will grant an easement for sequoia point as the leshan nation which is the east bay oholone tribe. This is a legal arrange. That allows the city to transfer the right of use for the land for cultural purposes including ceremonial traditions and native Habitat Restoration and education activities. If there is nothing further commissioners, we can move on to department matters. Item 2, directors report. Commissioners, i just wanted to point out, you got an email from dan cider earlier today, its an initial take on ab2011. This passed a week ago so its not yet signed by the governor but we anticipate it will be signed by the governor and take effect next year. So we had discussed out of the state housing bills that were working its way, that working their way through the legislature. This is the one that could have the biggest impact on our work in processes and what it does is allow for ministerial approval so no dr, no cu, no ceqa work on code compliant project that are in certain Zoning Districts and meet certain criteria. So, i mean, just high level, it has to be five units or more. It has got to meet a minimum of affordability threshold which are inclusionary does but those would be onsite. As they have to be in Zoning Districts that allow for housing and commercial use, so it cant be an rh district or pdh district thats exclusively residential or commercial but nc districts, the mixeduse Zoning District in eastern neighborhoods would apply and it to be on a roadway greater than 70 feet from Property Line to Property Line. So, were mapping that and well get you a map of where that is but its generally, you know, if you have two kind of typical traffic lanes and 2 parking lanes, it wouldnt apply to a 24 street for instance in the mission but it would apply to wider streets like tara vallard and van necessary and south of market arterials. You cant demo housing on the site so if theres existing housing, that site wouldnt apply. There are some height in density increases but they cap out at 65 feet and most height district are over 65 feet on the eastern side of the city. You can couple this with state density bonus and you must meet certain labor standards but its primarily prevailing wage, so again, well provide more information as we further analyze the indiscernible and provide maps to you but we wanted to get you an initial kind of take on it so you have that but happy to answer questions or calendar this as an item when weve fully digested it as well. Thank you, director luis. As the department is preparing for this, i would i guess my question and perhaps when there is some sort of informational session about this because San Francisco has its own inclusionary housing requirements. There are very much three types and so if a development doesnt have onsite but have offsite fees or land dedication, will that be part of the ministerial approval as well . Theyve got to be onsite or at least at the level the minimum level thats required under 2011 which i think is 13 but those have to be onsite. So you couldnt totally see out and have a project, that subject ab2011. Yeah. I would like if other commissioners, but i would like to have informational session about this as well. Sure. Thank you. If youre getting calls from planning directors in other jurisdictions who may potentially be moving affected given that streets in those locations are far wider than San Francisco anyway. Yeah, we havent yet. That, you know, our staff is generally great at interpreting these laws and tends to be in front of others but we havent received any inquiries from other agencies. Thanks. Thank you. Thank you. Item 8, review of pavt events to the board of supervisors and board of appeals and Historic Preservation commission. Good afternoon, commissioners, veronica filling in for aaron, the manager at legislative affairs and the land use and Transportation Committee hearing was cancelled in honor of the Labor Day Holiday and the full board did return from the summer recess. There were four ordinances which passed under first read. So, these included the mayors ordinance on electric vehicle, changing locations, supervisor melgar on conditional use appeals and the landmark dedz nation at mothers building in San Francisco sponsored by supervisor melgar and lastly the landmark designation on 200 road island trade and sponsored by supervisor dorsey so all ordinances passed on the first read. This concludes of brief board report and i want to wish those who celebrate a mid autumn holiday, thank you. Okay. I did not receive a report from the Zoning Administrators Office related to the board of appeals so i do not have a report from them. But the Historic Preservation commission did meet yesterday and they considered preservation alternatives for the property at 3251 20th avenue known as the stones town galleria. They also heard some of the internship projects and those presentations that were moef they were mostly rehated to Historic Preservation. We can move on to general Public Comment. Members of public may address the commission on items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission accept agenda items. With respect to the agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when your item is reached in the meeting and each member of the public may address the commission for up to three minutes. When the number of speakers exceed 15 minute limit, the general Public Comment may be moved to the end of the agenda. Good afternoon commissioners, theres handouts for those who are here. Gorgia. I sent an email on the 29th. And i thought you were going to meet the first but you had the hiatus. It has the two emails previously from october 2018 and i hope you can watch the sfgov general Public Comment on october 4th and october 11, 2018, and just to set up that timeframe and i forgot my notes, that was between the rat getting killed, recapped as i like to say unfortunately and i think we should have a debate on that and the possess scan legislation introduced but a year after october 2018, that was withdrawn and you had joint meetings with dbi so i think if you watch that, you kind of have a sense of what was happening then and october 34, there was an irrelevant choiry from president hillis to staff to ms. Watty about the demo cal and thats an important statement and its 26 minutes on the october 4th. And, also at that hearing, commissioner richards asked me, he said what is enforcement. My point of the list is not to get people in trouble but to raise the issue of why the demo indiscernible need to be justed and why you should use your legislative authority to adjust the demo cat that has been there in 2019, section 217b23 and thats the point of the list and so, as i said in my current emails on the 29th, i updated the list and its there. I think those should be considered. Certainly, the more recent ones that i have on the third page of the, excuse me, the third page of the attachment, certainly warrant a look, see. And these are extreme alterations and some were mergers and some were this and that but the definition of extreme alteration that i had is we have horizontal vertical expansion, the facade basically removed, and exculpation. They need your legislative tool to adjust the demo cats and i put that cartoon there. When i saw that in january 1st morning at breakfast, i said, wow, this is is what its all about, i hope you dont think thats disrespectful but to me itten capsulates the whole problem with the demo calts not being adjusted and i want to add since now enforcement in the da are rolled into current planning, thats a perfect time to work with just the demo calt and do it on the front end when its not too late. If i may indulge for a minute. Can you send me these to th