Arrange for on overflow room and again, if youre occupying a seat for that item youll be sitting here for sometime okay. Id like to call roll at this time. Commissioner president fong commissioner Vice President richards commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore and commissioner wu we expect commissioner johnson to be absence today commissioners, the first item on your agenda is our items proposed for continuance item o1 Market Street preliminaries negative declaration is proposed until march 16 and item 2 post street also known as as peace plaza suit 3 hundred conditional use authorization is proposed until march 2016 and item 3 at van ness conditional use authorization is proposed for continuance until march 17 and item 4 somerset street conditional use authorization has been withdrawn and finally item 5 Fourth Street avenue conditional use authorization it, too has been withdrawn i have no other items proposed for continuance and 3rd strei h speaker cards. Any Public Comment on item 3. Move to continue items 1, 2, 3 to march 17. To continue as proposed commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you under your consent calendar for item 6 at union street the ferry plaza seafood conditional use authorization i also i have no speaker cards any Public Comment on item the one item on the consent calendar. I dont see any Public Comment is closed. And commissioner antonini and move to approve. Second. Thank you, commissioners on that motion to approve item 6 commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you under commission matters consideration of Adoption Draft minutes for february 4th and 11, 2016. Any Public Comment on this item . On the draft minutes or february 4th or 11 not seeing any, Public Comment is closed. And commissioner wu. Move to approve draft minutes. Second. Thank you, commissioners think outside the box that motion to adopt the minutes for february 4th and 11 commissioner antonini commissioner hillis commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero and places you on item 8 for commissioners questions or comments. Commissioner antonini. Yeah. I think that we had commissioner Vice President richards mentioned looking for this and a couple of massing ago there was a study by the California Legislative Analyst Office the conclusion granddaughtdwrauwas that in low income neighborhoods where there is significant amount of construction of new maufrtsd the rate of displacement is a half of that wh which would occur in the staame neighborhood wheith no new construction 67 marketrate housing i think an interesting study answers the question of new impact on displacement and pricing within the neighborhoods of existing housing it is an interesting study it was also written up in the Washington Post and ill see if i can get Commission Secretary and get a link to the study so any member of the public can read it an interesting point it brings up in extensive sub urban designtion the filtering that was the case if the past in if exist in oakland and other cities flirment is a concept that older housing is less valuable the 50s and 60s in San Francisco older housing the western edition and other neighborhoods most notably older Environmental Impact telethons westbou were not desirable people left out of the city and rent and pricing the areas fell so dramatic especially parts of western edition unfortunately were torn down strangerly enough that has turned one and 80 degrees around the remaining structures in those areas are much more valuable than built new to the areas after the older homes were torn down we have the flirltd didnt exist as a matter of fact, people are interested in denser housing and Historic Housing and interested in being close within urban areas so that explains part of the reason why older housing within all neighborhoods has increased in value and will continue to do so unless a big change in public prospective of what is desired no housing an interesting study. Commissioners, if theres nothing further, well move on to Department Matters item 9 2kr06789. Good afternoon, commissioners want to let you know about a forum i attend on saturday, i think there were many people from the public for the displacement that was sponsored aby abag with respect to Regional Planning a well attended event three hundred people from the region and elected officials and Community Activists and developers and several of the Department Staff with were there a number of Solutions Discussed i think the most important thing is simply there is a growing acceptance and awareness that the issues of Affordable Housing and displacement are regional not local issues i appreciate that discussion and very much appreciate seeing abag holding the discussion and have future events around the same topic before a plan in the bay area so ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. From the commission on t t thatly let you you know the future. Commission item past events with the board of supervisors and the board of appeals no Historic PreservationCommission Meeting yesterday. Good afternoon aaron starr manager, legislative affairs the first item was supervisor breed ordinance that allow the blade signs the commercial Transit District the commission heard this on december 17th of last year and vote unanimously to recommend approval with modifications. The commissions proposed administration were to require the signs to employ a remote transmitter and as near as possible and the sign to have a direct means of eliminations that is hallo low lettering and only allow the preliminary occupant you think to have that sign at the land use hearing there was a presentation by supervisor breed aid and the Planning Department no Public Comment and no questions from the Committee Members the Committee Voted Unanimously to for the record with a positive recommendation next thon the agenda was supervisor wieners to rezone noah valley town square on 24th street it is currently zoned 24th street nc d Public Open Space with the sdooern this was heard at the Planning Commission on february 11th of this year and amazing recommended for approval in Public Comment and no questions from the supervisors or the Committee Members sorry the committee voted to recommend approval to the full board last the Committee Heard supervisor avalos the authorization for the removal of unauthorized units you recall this as Land Use Committee at the february 8th hearing the committee he recommended approval of the amended verlgs that will apply to the c3 district a at the hearing supervisor wiener asked. An approval for the singlefamily homes the singlefamily district that are deemed quotes that is moving through the process this week the duplicated file it is all disabilitricts was back 6 additional amendments those primarily address the concerns from the commission which heard the item for the second time at the hearing significant Public Comment about housing and half against particularly the Apartment Association raised the process for the singlefamily homes should be simpler was rarely mandatory dr instead of an unauthorized unit in a singlefamily supervisor wiener property an amendment to the deputies owners this amendment will require a dr for removing an unauthorized units from a singlefamily home instead of a cu and to propose the timeline for the 3 years those amendments will be considered at next week land use the stha has time to draft the minutes the Committee Voted Unanimously to extend it to the full board with a positive recommendation the duplicated amendment will be considered next week. At the full board this week supervisor avalos to require the cu for illegal units and legal units the removal of c3 passed it second reading and the increase to the Transportation Sustainability fee aspired by supervisor avalos passed on 6 to 5 vote on the facing the rising sun of our new day begun, First Reading and the appeal of the category aable exception for the proposed Shuttle Program this appeal was withdrawn the board tabled it and no introductions that concludes my report thank you. Thank you. And the board of appeals met last year with the full agenda and concluded at the stroke of midnight a couple of items to the interest of the commission relate presentation by jeff and depending on to the board of appeals with the residential Design Guidelines and to the Residential Design Team and the project in mission bay the Office Buildings with the association with the Warriors Arena a the board denied the appeal and angle appeal the variance the rear yard modification for the harding theatre you heard the conditional use authorization it was not appealed this was just the variance of the rear yard modification to facilitate the residential building at the rear of the 0 lot and the board unanimously dashboard that appeal denied that appeal for the ashbury an offstreet parking and seeking to potentially patake within sfgh d park within the cigaretsetback space really less than 15 feet deep an substandard space the board unanimously denied that and finally on appeal to the street youre youve heard as a discretionary review authorization for the wire facility for the proper here and the board denied that appeal at the upheld the permit as well on that and thats all. Okay. Thank you. Commissioners, if theres nothing further, well move on to item 11 for case at Mission Street this is angeles informational presentation and the public requirement. Good afternoon commissioner president fong and members of the board carli Department Staff the item before you an informational presentation presentation on the public art installation as part of mixed income on Mission Street ill provide a brief overview and the planning code requirement for the public park the architect will present 9 project and the artist will provide an overview in may of 2014 the project was approved for the mixed income on about mythical with 83 dwelling units and retail formula. It provides 100 percent all units will be restricted for families earning in the mornino0 percent ami and at risk of homeless earning more than thirty percent of ami the project required the component valued will equal to one percent of the Construction Costs for the demonstration the project sponsor has xhiktsdz jim campbell spvl in the work to provide the work to satisfy this requirement the Planning Department finds the artwork complies with the section and the cost of the art exceeds one percent of the Construction Cost would be visible from the right away rightofway the approval requires the final art location be submitted for review at the planning director in contusion with 9 Planning Commission in todays hearing were seeking the concept and location for the proposed art installation that concludes my presentation. Im going to turn it over to dan solomon of the architecture and cryi across the city is available for questions about the project thank you. Thank you very much. Im daniel solomon with the architectur architects for mission mr. Be becker it is a pleasure to present this to you and show the work of our very distinguished and interesting innovative Public Artist gym campbell and how to represents to the building weve designed 1036 will mission is a nonstory building articulated into two verlth parts between the with two vertical mass the entries this is surrounding the entrance to the 12 foot high panel that are from the entrance and supplemental secondary piece which jim has graciously offered to do in addition to the main piece the building faces a parking lot for a long time at the clubhouse on 7th street and mission and the side wall one wall of the building faces that parking lot we rewardiwork hard articulate that into graceful proportions and add shadow casting pegs on top of that and jim has convinced us he can animate those in an extraordinary way that is the second piece of public guard and the plan planning elevation is the location of the principle public art at the sfwrarns flanking the entrance so people entering the building will go 20 20 between the two panels of public art and visual to the restrooms on mission so go back to 9 prospective and jim will explain in more detail what hes proposed thank you. Hi my name is jim campbell i was chosen to create that artwork i thought because it is an unfinished work ill start with the presentation of the existing works ive created. This is the work ive finished about two two years ago this is at san diego airport and it is seven hundred foot sculpture on the ceiling above the pedestrians in the gate area of terminal two and my work in general works with small lights it create images in very low resolution and in this case there are images of swimmers above the peoples heads and theyre walking down the terminal to kind of animate the space it is normally kind of boring this was a two, 3 year project that took to complete and it exiscaptivities of 40 thousand individual hung lights it creates the background my backward was Electrical Engineering theres a building in hong kong the tall itself building in hong kong they decided to hand to over to an artist for the first time and choose me because of my long time working with low recessing resolution illustrati the lights existed i put my work on top of of the existing structure instead of the ads that are normally there. And so use the same footage i did for the san diego airport you can see this for about 20 miles away. This is the work i just finished in at the duo money civic center a 90 foot thirty foot high sculpt it is animated in this case with runners from the detainiillo demoney than in used lights in this case 15 hundred light bulbs and another work that used glass that is slightly related to the work ill do on Mission Street that was your time you may want to get to the current prospering proposal. Im sorry, i thought i had longer the current proposal is here it is a series of glass cubes that create a kind of modulated surface ill go very quickly i dont realize that was my time. The one on the right is the one were choosing from straight on it looks normal if you will, and the side is abstract uses the effect called total internal reduction the image no matter how long it exists on the surface. This will be the doorway of the building and quickly the agencies had suggested putting those rods highlighting the shadows and the from the sun and i found some technology where i can turn those lights into solar powder appendix he lives to eliminate the cost of the infrastructure so youll end up u up with two screens on the side of the building that are completely solar powder this gives a softer light very unlike union square. Any other presentation opening it up for Public Comment 80 on this item if there is any not seeing any, publishc commen is closed. Commissioner antonini. Yeah. To the sponsor just i saw the 3 choices for the figure who was walking i wondered why the decision to be the blurer of the 3 rather than the one that is clearer york i dont care i was interested especially the side view is a harder to make out what is happening. I like my work more sculpture like it from two perspectives it looks different and straight on cant tell the distortions are there and from the side i want it almost unrecognizable but aware of the abstract state you can tell you can youve seep it the other state. Okay. Thank you. I personally like the art updates. Commissioners, if theres nothing further, well move on to general Public Comment not to exceed a period of 15 minutes at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission except agenda items. With respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. Each member of the public may address the commission up t