Aau is above the law the Department Needs to restore Public Confidence beyond why the Planning Department of rebating permit violations exists the aau we all know their unlivable to change their predatory and callous practices of land use violations it is disturbing to me as to why the department is not activate the City Attorney and use the recommendations under the planning code in section 17 of one can only speculate why it is a matter of principle and justice thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Im going to be using the overhead im not going to start until he sets it back at 3 pardon me. Im ready. My name is sieving ive been dealing with this case for 14 years on the overhead is the map that was the eir academy of arts red is housing the blue is Institutional Uses was the first map all im asking for the Planning Commission to take the opportunity to reset the hearing informational hearing with the ability for the public to give input on the report you got last friday or thus on the i p m the basic acquisition have been by the academy of art im looking this map theyve been required to have an im p since 1991 and on stockton street today is 25 years later theyre still not disclosing the Land Acquisition the Planning Commission should give input for an i p m we really havent had the opportunity more has the public had the opportunity to give input the i p m is a hollow shell the only thing you do is allow a defective i mp to be filed and installed forever that he on the backside of the paper that i have that has this thing im asking you to do a summary when the i mp came in and the eir starred they filed a defective i mp in 2006 and two in 2007 the Planning Commission said theyre not complete you need more information and basically told i got to get rid of of this thing so we can have a project for the eir so that sets the context for when the Planning Commission quote accepted as complete the i mp the result no opportunity for the Planning Commission to give instructions to the e i u for example, we should have a discussion the public as well as the commission on how they have to list the projects it is obtaining securing projects intentionally have to decide they have to build housing there is enormous housing their draining the Housing Stock one thousand units obtaining laid housing and sros and Group Housing all over the place needs to be a place you have to tell people to build housing thank you, maam. Your time is up. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hi, everyone im a small landlord in the city and county of San Francisco i was not aware im able to do anything i feel like in any of the my properties, in fact, when i dont have a sewer coffer i get fined a hundred bucks and when i start to build something without a permit my site is shut i i dont understand i dont why we cant get away with things you may recognize me as a housing activist im amazed for 15 years no Affordable Housing in the mission and were fighting tooth and nail to get a developer to give us one hundred units we have a Community Meeting it was hot as hell and were arguing can we have a hundred unit and one thousand on the table for rich kids to buy their degree from the aau were petitioning and i cant understand why for 25 years you have not yielded so i support you actually moving he support you getting the attorneys on them to close them down theyre just making money the tuition is not covering the rent just a buy your University Degree i dont know why youre allowing and urge you to stop them not in 25 more years but were talking about Affordable Housing and theres no money by you 3 million on the table sitting there in fees and fines ill let them get away with i dont know 6 hundred more units in the mission i really. Urging you to act and not lingering and let them get away my message is do whatever you want and thats what we can do no rules that apply to anyone. Is there any additional Public Comment . Hi commissioners im john he was not going to comment but i want to correct something the commenters have said although i understand a need to take care of the academy of arts universities has over month years procrastinated there are housing implementation of having a you thought of 10 or 20 thousand of students the unit those students live in are being you know grant through their university theyre not empty people live there and so is the university is a buy your degree for students or foreign students whatever the previous commenter said it ant be offense as a person that went to a universities that if require a portfolio review i working hard for my degree and just because it wasnt a super super top art universities i know a lot of people that went to an academy of Arts Institute and people that graduated from there this is not a Fake University a blatantly offense statement to thousands and thousands of people that are san franciscans okay. Please get them inclines e compliance. I have some not had visual aids in years so i do have a couple of things to show on the overhead so the first comment id like to make that Student Housing is generally recognized as a critical need in San Francisco most of other post secondary institutions recognize that r and are taking steps to audience that aau expressly states going through the existing vacated or unutilized properties now as i walk through any neighborhood that is rentcontrolled units buildings that are taken off the market and used to house people in San Francisco but people that brought to San Francisco so attend the university to remove the Housing Stock that would be otherwise available for the open market the second thing ill note with the if so it broadly distributed one of the challenges for students is time theyve got a lot to do when you look at the the roots and other than that, map youll see the blue housing to the southernmost red dot which is one of theyre other buildings this is a 28 minute car ride in our driving if you take the shuttle bus it gets more convoluted you have a problem with the Student Housing not convenient to the institutional 9 i p m proposed to continue that you what i find confusing is how anything is going to make rational judgements about the housing responsibility to theyll be providing a company that was planning it bring in large numbers of people so when you look at the are enrollment data if needing that is cited the 2015 eir it is 11 thousand plus and theyre talking about a prorjd growth of about 4 thousand students and 5 found faculty and staff by 2020 thats impressive where is that housing coming from. Its hard to make sense when the recent i p m says off no only 5 thousand students fulltime assistance how did that square with the eir and the growth projections weve got that inconsistent please tell me how you evaluate the district of those documents thank you. Gamechanger commissioner cynthia at local 2 where the local unions and we represent the front deck clerks and others that represent the workforce i want to raise and question has to do with with the impacts on housing for this workforce members of the local 2 and raise the question about the impacts specifically of aau housing subject to rent control we know a very purposed stock the city not renewal one point about the Student Housing students are a population of high turnover that means that rent control is limited its ability to keep the rents low given the high turnover and the students exit their at lease when planning taxes into consideration the impact of the aa us i will ask they take into account the service ingress off of houses to be used for the workforce we represent thank you for you time. To clarify none from aau is here to speak Public Comment is closed. Commissioner antonini. Thank you thank you, mary for an excellent report and to try to get to some of the things youve asked us to do youve carding the different types of approvals we will the future need to consider for the academy based on a different categories and understanding this moves in concert with the Environmental Impact report that is prepared that evaluates the existing situation month eirs deal with something the future we understand that is the present situation with that said your place to proceed. A certain category of these projects those parts of academy that will need legislative action before they could be legalized so it seems to me those should be sedate aside until such time as the type of you know legislation is done to allow those to be considered and then the other ones that would be excluded will be those that need Building Permit well not have to take action and deemed to be legal so it leaves us with the conditional uses and the ones that need historic action that presuming needs to be heard by the Historic Preservation commission before we will be able to consider them am i correct . Yes. You are staff wanted to provide the commission with an overview of the entire picture i know which ones that needs the Commission Approval like you said the with Building Permit will not need to come to the commission. And then in terms of the ones we have to opine in terms of the conditional uses ill assume any of these that meet historical need a condition not sure what sort of action in the event is seems to me the most beneficial option to consider in agreeing gaits needs collectively rather than trying to do is grateful graphically it make sense including but not limited to to group the same deficiency and need a conditional use that is based on the same sort of condition and consider all those at the same time and move to the next category rather than trying to do it geographyly they might feeling. Well take into consideration and like you said some of the projects requires conditional use and also Historic Preservation commission and Building Permits and we can go grizzly it in terms of the highest level of review required so if it is a project needs a conditional use in order to move to the next step of the Historic Preservation or Building Permit is falls under the conditional use because the site cant go get a Building Permit without a conditional use first. Right. So. When you list two of the Building Permits i assume that category and radios legal ill assume they may or may not may needs permitting but didnt involve us. Only in the discretionary review this dr and staff needs to bring it to the commission. Thank you that makes it clear in realizing a series of steps; right when were ready to hear those and the ground work is laid down im id like to advocate for that to be the most efficient thank you. I pushed the button i see the Zoning Administrator has a question id like to have you speak first. I want to make sure that the representatives of the academy have here in the room. Thank you question i have i said this the first time i heard the issue way back i turned to the Zoning Administrator and say each each time we hear the aau and other properties that are converted or notify of the Additional Properties that were acquired legally. I want to environment ms. Woods it is complicated and your doing a good job back to the issue mr. Sanchez of the fines weve heard members of the Public Comment about the first paragraph the staff report can you comment on what that is. Im happy to have the opportunity to clarify weve completed the enforcement on at least one property on townsend and had a hearing at the board of appeals at the end of december 2010 penalties awe krirg referred to the City Attorneys office and to date there their penalties of approximately half a Million Dollars for the property. For the other properties we have pursued the process of first of the stay and weve been having the process of pulling penalties and setting a deadline with the penalties accrue if they fail it act in good faith it was after the deadline but we were working and they were making diligence efforts and were setting the deadline of july 1st with the guidelines if they fail the penalties will accrue well issue the letters after that at least perhaps for clearing for our sake the publics sake if there is out of compliance an additional fin you know any finances on the property and when will they start to accrue and the total fines of the dates to get an idea we heard 300 million and nine hundred thousands that will clarify it for myself and the public and the other commissions any comment. We can definitely add that and provide clarity moving forward to date penalties have accrued and continue on 460 townsend and taylor for a period of two weeks no penalties by the academy of art theyre aware of the penalties they continue to accrues crew on the other properties theyve been assessed under the theme theyre liable for the fees for the enforcement weve been assessing those over the years i think the sum total is close to one hundred thousand dollars that will help us understand the cost of in terms of what were abating that is, i think a good thing for the public to understand we have several issues 200 and 52 ramps i read an article last week one of the supervisors had an informational hearing on the state of the homeless situation one of the members of czar of the Homeless Department i forget what it is called one of the issues for additionally Emergency Rooms it was a very, very high impact situation and it is got got to be take place seriously ms. Hester i have a question for you if you dont mind. The whole issue on the i mp and the public review process im a little bit confused where were you saying the addendums should have a public review it is administratively. Ive been through a bunch of imp this was not done for a u pardon me a gun to the head of the commission we need a project eir so what i asked for the conditional use to continue that decision and have the hearing on the 19 of may and have the consideration of feedback to the aau based on the imp not the eir that was what i was school board. Zoning administrator you pushed the button. Thats not all correct weve had multiple multiple hearings on the imp ms. Hester i think your time is over im trying to answer the questions multiplied hearings back to 2007 it was inadequate and two or three pages long we found out the extent of the multiple of violations we came to you with a. M. An imp hearing and requested Additional Information i dont know the exact number one number of hearings leading up to the acceptance imp it was not near what you submitted and much aboard it is quite comprehensive he reject the gun to the commission i think many of the commissioners were here at that time, i dont know of any representation that the commission has to accept this the commissions choice and the commission choose to accept it i dont recall anything other than that. The 5 year update. The update in 2013 would be in 2015 and they have been compliant with that their would be other full imp 20 if there is a substantial change no one identified for a loophole imp one of the purposes to have this further discussion about the imp and people can express their concerns about the imp those are documents available on the website and in your opinion the update is complete. It is adequate. One other question i guess for ms. Wood. So if we have anyone member of the public mr. Weber hand in paperwork with discrepancies in terms of students accounted and varies documents any comments what well officially look at it it. Hes talking about enrollment at the aau is it would be a higher number than the actual enrollment so actually, it is lower than than projected. Okay thank you commissioner moore. Id like to acknowledge staff for not having a continuing to do an effort to push this along it is somewhat with a heavy heart i need to remind myself very cordially, having be looked at this process since 2006 something socializing missed and youll go back to the tapes all the way back to 2007 with the first hearing on the imp in 2011 ive been a vocal critic of the puc it is being nearly a real estate many of the other san franciscan institutions have a. D. Miller done and set rngsz as a we continue to hear others imps im not saying anything about talking about anyone with usf or is San Francisco general or the most recently hastings we dont have to come here ive again and again and again said look at those imps put them on our shelf and use them as a high bar for what the commission is expecting ive said in many will recall that i urge the department to get funding in place to really create metrics by which imp are apples to apples and apples and oranges i stand by my comment ive not believed that the imp that were using as a guiding document is providing us really with tools that are equal by which were looking everybody else and institutions like the in some here i see quite well, are part of the civic structure of the city and has been painful for all of us the many mergers to go through the process and have to see that we are not creating any tools we as the commission can use the imp process