Vision zero more a national movement, so San Francisco continues to lead and we also continue to learn from other cities around the country that have set this ambitious goal, so thats the vision vao er row citys conference. I also had the opportunity in february to attend a meeting put on by the national highway traffic administration, the administrator was in San Francisco asking leaders from government and public h eflt to share sfrat jis for improving what he calls behavior change, everything from antismoking campaigns to seat belt campaigns to figure out how the federal government can get engaged in sending Strong National message to drivers about how to drive safely and achieve the goal that is we in San Francisco call vision vao er row, thats my report on vision zero at the state and national level. Im just curious, when you get together with these different cities that are implementing vision vao er row, do you have a sense of how much they spend to get to vision zero . You know, i dont have a spefng apples to apples number that i can compare to what we spent in San Francisco, we spent about 9ed. 5 Million Dollars on the first 24 and 24 project that we completed earlier this year. I do know that many cities are at different place ins the vision vao er row journey, some have made the commitment, some have put together a Multiagency Group like we have, some have leveraged really strong advocates as well, so i dont have a direct answer, its something we could be able to research and come back to you. Especially if yu break it down into not only the engineering enforcement that are hard to break down i guess, but the education piece, Public Education on the [inaudible] it would be interesting to see how much each place spends probably to be fair, how much did they spend per person, you know, obviously new yorks going to possibly be spending a lot more money. Okay. Any other questions . Okay. Do we take Public Comment on these things . No questions, so thank you very much, mr. Maguire, any Public Comment on this item . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. Mr. Clerk, can you call item number 4. Item 4, next generation of vision zero projects, this is an information item. Its you again. Sorry. Okay, so we talked about whats happening at the national level, we also know that right now as we look at the projects we want to do in 2016, were certainly looking back on a year in 2015 when we did not see a drop in the number of fa fatalities from 14 to 15, so we lost the same number that we did in 2014 like we did in 2015, were not fast enough with our project delivery, we see the Driver Behavior is the leading cause, fail tog yield, speeding, red light, nothings changed there, we know we did get a lot of work done in 2015. We have increased the number of citations, were focused on the five, we put out engineering treatments, Something Like 1500 small and large treatments as well as completing more than the 24 and 24 that we made the commitment to back in 2014, so looking ahead at 2016, the last time we met, you asked us to come back with a list of projects across all the vision vao er row disciplines and have that be something we continue to track through this committee in the years ahead, our focus in 2016 is trying to get a handle on excessive speeding, youll see throughout the presentation that we want to focus engineering, education, policy and enforcement efforts on controlling those excessive speeds, those drivers going 10, 15, 20 miles over the speed limit, were so disproportionately at faults nr the fatalities we see on the street. So, i want to go through the next few slides, these are highlights of the longer list that we distributed as part of the meeting packet. We want to give you a flavor of the engineering enforcement, education and evaluation project that is we have under way in 2016 and 2017. One thing we talked about last time is some of these are projects that are quick turn around time, projects well get done in the year 201617, other are streetscape improvements, for instance, the ma sonic street gate project that we will break ground on this june, thats not going to get done in 2016, thats a multiyear project, there are throughout this presentation the key milestones we think we can deliver over the next two years and these projects span every supervisorial district fwh the city and they span everything from bike ped improvements, road diets on streets like turk, things like the radar speed feedback sign, something thats been specifically requested through the participatory budgeting process in district 7, so again, wide range of projects and wide range of neighborhoods and well be reaching major milestones and or completing these projects in 2016, 2017. On the unfortunate side, we are really excited that San FranciscoPolice Department is going to begin a pilot of east citations with the traffic company, this will streamline the reporting of crash data from the field and really help improve standardize the date da and help us get a handle on crashes and collisions in a much more robust way. We also have an aniseed campaign, well have a presentation on that later in the agenda today. Excuse me, just a quick question. You explained the key citation, what does that mean. Key citation iss the ability of the officer to write a citation from handheld smart phones as opposed to writing the citation, the quality of the data is much better. On the education front, we have a number of targeted campaigns happening this year, we have a specific issue with motorcycle speeding causing crashes, so we secured some funding for to launch a Motorcycle SafetyEducation Campaign, Funding Community based organizations to do some neighborhood based culturally appropriate Safety Education to seniors, of course the safety town project will be complete, the department of public works is working on it, so a wide range of approaches to education as well. On the evaluation front, weve always said that vision zero in San Francisco is a data driven eft so were going to continue to invest in the tools that prioritize our investments based on data, well be updating the high entry data, thats where 72 of our collisions take place, the Health Department did that groundbreaking work in 2014 and were going to update that network to make sure we are always working with the most recent collision data as we engineer vision zero projects, also updating transbase and that helps us link records from places like San FranciscoGeneral Hospital with what we learn from police crash reports and on the policy front, it is our goal to secure sponsorship for the ase enforcement bill, in 2015, we did make some progress on this, we did not get a sponsor, we drafted legislation, we had 22 letters of support from organizations around the city and around the state, and our goal in 2016 is to move towards introduction of the bill in december, 2016 so we continue to did outreach with a number of interested groups, teamsters, triple a, Law Enforcement, Public Health, group that is are specifically interested in privacy issues to really get all the feedback that we need to find sponsors and get that legislation moving in december, 2016 t, so thats an overview of what we are proposing as our vision vao er row priority project list for 201517. Thank you. Supervisor kim . Thank you, chair yee. Thank you, mr. Maguire for the presentation. I had two questions. One, you know, i wanted to know your thoughts on what the strategy was to get an author for the state legislation in 2016 because i know weve now tried for two legislative cycles so weve done the letter writing, we reached out to potential sponsors, wats the thinking of how well get it on the docket next year. I would like to let my colleague to come up and answer that question. Shes spearheading that campaign. That is a 60 Million Dollar question, so we have been working very consistently in moving forward, i think in educating a Larger Community outside of San Francisco on the benefits and the proven practice of automated Speed Enforcement, that is not simple or a linear path as weve come to learn. I think its been critical in continuing to educate both our delegation as well as interested other members of the legislature that advocates have been at our side. I dont think that us alone really would have been successful and so we i think the progress that i can really point to is that we have sat down with the opposition and heard exactly what concerns they have who are they . Im speaking specifically about the teamsters who have had a traditional i wouldnt call it an out right opposed position on this specific proposal but really the issues that relate to the use of cameras in general for enforcement, and so weve been sitting down with them, i think a lot of the work that has happened here with unions in general has really helped open that dialogue to one where theres an openness of mind to have a conversation, to listen to why we continue to believe that this is a tool that San Francisco needs to have. In addition to that, again, with the advocates at our side, i think a good deal of influence and pressure has been brought to our own delegation and i think we feel confident that members of our own delegation, i dont want to speak for them at this point, but feel pretty positive about a willingness to introduce a bill and when tom says december of this year, that is the earliest that we could see [inaudible]. I understand that, so who could you mention who has expressed interest in introducing in december of 2016 . Weve been talking to Assemblymember Chiu chu and this year to get into the process, we were working closely with the city of san jose and we were really taking their lead at this time and working with members of their delegation and the end of the process by which we needed to have an author, they decided they werent ready, and so there was not much time left and i think that our delegation has seen what it means to westbound on camera legislation in sacramento. Has there been do we have Coalition Members and advocates and other city members to help us do a multiprong approach, so san jose is working on their representative, were working on assemblyman chu, l. A. Is the other major city i assume that might be interested. L. A. Is not there yet on the camera proposal, they are looking at rebooting on how speed limits are set in los angeles, theyre focused on speed, it came to our attention last week that the city of coranato had a Unanimous Council decision to enforce Speed Enforcement, the city of sacramento in the last month has adopted vision zero commitment, so for all of us, its not happening fast enough, but i think, you know, each path that we take at this, i think as im talking here, we had a positive conversation with the California Association of Police Chiefs whose members are also eager to have this tool, so thats a sort of short version of the play by play, and thats where its at. Is there kind of a calendar of Different Things that we plan on doing between now and december . Yes. And then the one thing i remember from attend thing vision zero conference in new york city was how they were able to lower the speed limits in new york city was through intensive outreach by families who have lost someone due to a vehicular collision and they spent a lot of time going up arranging office visits, i mean, this is the time to do it, so between march and november, having families set up appointment, even if the office isnt free until may, june or october, at least you get those dates in and families are able to share their Actual Stories and im not if theres hearings on these issues where people can come up and speak on Public Comment. So, those are all things that should be part of any work plan that has tactics that are going to be successful, i totally agree with you and weve talked extensively with nicole and her team at walk sf in mobilizing those units, if we had an author in november, we would have started that in november, a lot of behind the scenes stuff that we couldnt do, here we are and we have a commitment with the citys lobbyist to start engaging in those kinds of pelting. They dont have to be hearings, they can be individual meetings with legislators and with members of the administration, so but i think they still do have hearings that with open Public Comment. I think you need to start that campaign now because it seems like its not just enough to get the votes for the bill, you need to do that to get some authors on board. Have you sat down with aclu . Theyre next, we know we have entrees into that realm, we are trying to be strategic in how we start taking amendment tos the bill so we dont have five different versions of it out there, but they are very much at the top of the list as well. Great. My next question is back to mr. Maguire, thank you so much. Thank you. And that is im sorry if i might have missed this in the beginning, but i know last year, you know, with we announced that we were able to successfully finish 24 projects pie lots, that we had requested the next set of list for the next 24 months, and i know that you have the priority projects like the arguella bike lane and the turk street diet, im curious where the next 24 projects are and what that looks like. N the board packet today, we have a list of i believe its about 40 projects that were proposing would be that list that you asked for in december. Okay. Then i guess my question is what is the safe routes to School Project exactly . On page 8. Yes. Hello, my name is mike, [inaudible] im with the engineer with the group. That project is to complete a project thats currently under way if you go out to tenderloin, youll see some curbs being worked on, were adding bulbs out and adding work. Just on turk street . I believe its foe curds on turk, there may be a project on another intersection too, i believe theres at least two intersections on turk street and i would have to confirm the other location. Thats great, i hear about a lot of conflict on that corridor or that block as well. And [inaudible] i notice that some of them are to complete conceptual design, some of them is to complete construction, complete construction, and i absolutely want to expedite completing design, i think obviously thats a key piece of it, but i do want to clarify that i think when we talk about what are these expedited projects that we really mean complete construction, so i think its still good to have that comprehensive list of 40, but it would be great to know that there was 24 projects where we expect to complete construction in the next 24 months. Okay. Thank you. Supervisor campos . If we can go back to thank you, mr. Maguire, for the presentation, great work. On the automated Speed Enforcement, maybe if we can go back to that issue. Is that like a red light camera type thing, is that sort of how it works . How does it work. Er were trying to make a distinction between those because red light cameras have different couldnt verse ris, but the way that the proposal that we have would be to take images of license plates only, this proposal that San Francisco has been advancing is one that would be decriminalized in essence, its not a moving violation so, the images that are recorded are first triggered when the speed violation occurs and the photograph is taken of the license plate. I think we have to be careful about these things. I mean, i dent necessarily think there is or maybe im just its just me, but i think that we have to look at the privacy concerns and the desperate impact that some of these strategies have on certain communities. So, i dont know, you know, sort of where this falls in the efficacy of enforcement and sort of spectrum of what tactics makes sense, but i think that we need to be careful about this and i dont think it should be a given that everyone on this board will simply say yes, it does make sense bah i dont think we even have that discussion in terms of collectively as a board have, have we voted on automated Speed Enforcement . Its a policy in the adopted vision sao er rho action strategy. Were going to go down this path of pushing for this, i think we need to have more discussion on that because i think there are privacy concerns. There are, and i will say this to you, that is absolutely one of the top three issues that comes up whether the debate happens on automated Speed Enforcement in general, and the approach that and privacy in general, whether its clipper car data or other forms of personal data, the language that we have taken is lang language that is specifically prescribe hated the images could only be used for the purposes for which they are gathered if i can call it in shorthand, i hear what youre saying. The problem is you have a thee roy and you have a practice, if im an undocumented person drive ining the mission, what is that mean in terms of the chances that without me knowing, a camera could take a picture of my license plate and given to Law Enforcement and ending up in the wrong hands and even though certain things are not supposed to happen, weve had examples as recently as a few weeks ago of someone who was reporting a stolen car who ended up in detention, so i think we need to be carefu