Selection of Fund Allocation and Public Comment include concerns about geo graphic equity. 11 million in prop k and [inaudible] approved with [inaudible] and on capacity update item 8, our comment were mostly on lrt, on the timeframe of delivery, citing the increases around demand projection indicated the lrt should be indicated now. [inaudible] greater investment in transit that can handle increased demand and serve the existing population. With that, take any questions thank you for your report and weighing in on the west side sar. Seeing nor questions or comments well open up to public common. Item 2 . Seeing none Public Comment is closed. If we can go through the consent calendar, 3 to 4 are considered routine and staff not to present on the item. If a member objects any item cz be removed and considered separately seeing no questions any Public Comment on the consent calendar . Seeing none public comrnt is closed. On the consent calendar, avalos, aye. Commissioner cohen, aye. Commissioner farrell, absent. Commissioner peskin, aye. Commissioner tang aye. The consent calendar passes. Recommend appointment of 2 members to the citizen Advisory Committee. This is a action item, we have mike [inaudible] the Transportation AuthorityAdvisory Committee has 11 members suving a 2 year term. The plans and Programs Committee the board appoint to fill any vacancy. The transs portation thoert staff or caa make recommendation ons the appointment and applicants must be San Francisco residence and appear before the committee once. Attachment one shows information about currents Committee Member jz the list of applicants for vacant positions is attachment 2. Detailed application materials can be found in the enclosure. The vac aenss are a result of resignation of wells witney and mr. Lar son. Mr. Lar son is seeking reappoint there are 26 applicant you can consider and with that i can take any questions. Thank you, i dont see any questions here at this time. I believe that we had received word from commissioner yee who would support reappointment of john larson. Madam chair, if we could delay the district 3 appointment to our next meeting, i would appreciate that. Alright. So the motion to continue. Seconded by commissioner cohen and take that without objection. Are there any other applicants in the audience here . Please come up and make a presentation. If you wouldnt mind letting us know which seat you are interested in. [inaudible] in district 8 and not in [inaudible] any other vacant district but wanted to come and state im interested in any district that is available or open eve chb though i dont live or work in that district did you already submit a application . I did. So you are part of the packet. Thank you very much. Any questions or comments on that . Okay, thank you very much. Any other applicant here who submitted applications . Seeing none well open up item 5 to Public Comment. Any members who wish to comment on item 5 . Seeing none Public Comment is closed. Colleaguesalright, thank you commissioner avalos, seconded by commissioner cohen and take that without objection. So, well move on john larson for district 7 qu continue for district 3 appointee. Item 6, recommend approval of the 2016 prop a [inaudible] programming recommendations tote aelg 2, 192, 934 for 4 projects, amendment of the prop aa Strategic Plan. This is a action item. Thank you, we have anna [inaudible] here. Good morning supervisors. Anna [inaudible] for policy and programming. Im pleased to present to you the item for w the 2016 projject for vehicle rejivation fee program. Just a overview of the program, this is a additional 10 dollar vehicle Registration Fee approved by San Francisco voters in november of 2010. It is a relativity small source of funding generated less than 5 Million Dollars a year and in representation of the relatively small amount of funding there are only 3 cat goers, street repair and reconstruction, pedestrian and safety and transst reliability and mobility improvements and one of the primary focus is also on quick to deliver projects. Representing also that idea is any funds 234 that become available throughout the program is reprogrammed as thibecome available to the extent possible and these are fraujects completed under budget or if a project is able to be funded through new revenue sources. So, we have a approximately 1. 193 Million Dollars that is available for reprogramming right now. I just wanted to also give a few highlights of the program to date. So, in the current Strategic Plan for prop aa there is about 26 million in the 5 years to 19 projects. Pleased to report the program is on track, there have been allocation of more than 21 million to date and so there have been a few projects completed under budget in the categories shown on the screen that generated Funds Available for a immediate coffer project and given we had twice the amount of funds requested than we had available for programming, and we are nearing the ends the first 5 years of the Strategic Plan and when the board adopt thd first 5 years of projects, we had revenue assumptions that were based on a certain number of vehicles registered in San Francisco on a monthly and annual basis but decide to revisit or revenue assumptions for planning at the time. Ill go into it had additional revenue assumptions but based on the revised analysis of revenue we have 1 Million Dollar additional for programming at this time through the coffer projects or available nx year with the Strategic Plan update. This brings the total amount available assuming the funds will be reprogrammed at this time or at least the amoint available in general to about 2. 2 Million Dollars. This slide shows the analysis of the revenues that are available that are available now and are estimated to be available back in 2012. We began collecting rchb new march 2011 and it is a modest amount of additional revenue, it is about 3. 9 percent additional. When you look it over the 5 year period that we have been collecting revenues, it totals just over a Million Dollars and when you net out the 5 percent in Program Administration cost that is how you end windup the amount available now. This reserve as 240 million cap reserve which is 5 percent of the annual revenue which we think ask prudent for a fluctuation in revenue, however, the source has been a rel tivly stable amount of revenue over the years, it is just the increment is slightly higher. On this slide you see the applications we received so we received 5 applications requesting that 2. Sish Million Dollar and with increased revenue we are not able to fully fund all the applications as requested. We reviewed the applications eligibility and scored the applications and you can see the details of the criteria in your enclosure, but in general there is program wide criteria which is based on project readiness, can the project proceed to construction or at least to design in this fiscal year and analysis of community support, construction coordination opportunities. There are also cat go specific criteria, for example with Pedestrian Safety category the projects are consistent with walk first. The funds and transit reliability category are just over 500 thousand on a prior slide, there was a special condition adopted in the 2012 stuteejic plan that funds that became available in this category from cost savings arethat the funds are reortizeed for Muni Rapid Network projects. Which is reflected in the funding recommendation primarily for the muni bus layover area as bart daly city. We recommend fully funding the project with the Funds Available in that category as well as the 4 projects in the safety category. We dont recommend funding for the presidio project, this was the lowest scoring projecktd and the scores primarily recognized a lack of project readiness and also the lack of funds after higher scoring projects were funded. For the muni bus layover project this will accommodate plan service increase for the 14 rapid that will begin in the next few month squz allow the buses to layover on the paid parking lot at the bart station. It will take about 30 Parking Spaces but bart is supportive of this. [inaudible] will also commit funds to this project. We are also recommending funding for two one bay area grant projects. This is the broadway chinatown Streetscape Project which we recommend funding just over a Million Dollars and also to the health Streetscape Projects. [inaudible] is already under construction and broadway streetscape has bids out for advertisement and probably have come in recently. So, this would fully fund the one bay area grant projects which are high priority fraSan Francisco and would like to see them advancing smoothly and also recommend parjs fundsing for the design phase of walk first ball bout location and this will fund up to 25 existing safety zones with concrete bowl bouts and sfmta will prioritize the locations based on the walk first criteria and collision history at these locations so it will take out the [inaudible] and put in permanent concrete bowl bouts. And the locations are shown on the map. I also have Additional Information on the location of the potential locations for the bowl bout projects. Happy to dissiminate that information. Project sponsors are here, happy to answer any questions you might have. That concludes my presentation thank you very much. Compligzer peskin. Commissioner peskin j. I just wanted to thank staff and my colleague frz the million plus dollars to do the fourth phase of the broadway streetscape improvements, unfortunately a few days late for a Pedestrian Fatality that happened friday morning as a resident of district 3 who lived around the corner died in a hit and run at that intersection. I spent some time there on friday and again over the weekend and yesterday morning and visited the widow of the individual who was killed and the police are looking for the hit and run driver. There are immediate things we can do that i discussed with director riscon at the mta including daylighting on the corners until the project comes along but it is sorly needed, it is a very very dangerous intersection and right next to a elementary school, so im delighted it is moving forward thank you very much commissioner peskin. Anyone else . Seeing none thanks again, i think all the plaujects are wonnerful and look forward to help with efficiency at bart. At this time we open up item 6 to Public Comment. Any member of the public . [inaudible] killed at the corner of broadway and powell street in chinatown, so what happened is the Chinese People prefer they have a sign that says be careful when crossing the street [inaudible] a good way to have them be more aware of the [inaudible] alright. Thank you very much. Any other members on item 6. Seeing none we close Public Comment. We are joined by commissioner farrell so will take roll call commissioner avalos, aye. Commissioner cohen, aye. Commissioner farrell, aye. Commissioner peskin, aye. Commissioner tang, aye. The item passes. Thank you very much and now if we can call item 7 item 7, recommend allocation of 10, 975, 410 in prop k funds and 794, 980 in prop aa funds with conditions for 6 requests subject to attached fiscal year cash flow disbution. Action item thank you, mike [inaudible] we have 6 requests again. First, Protection System so this funds the [inaudible] this funds Protection Systems at presidio yard which [inaudible] currently only one of the facilities 8 maintenance has fall protection so there is a back log of roof related repairs. Second, sf pub lrk works requests to repave segment of claiten, clipper and por tola. The project will construct new curb ramp jz repair curbs and sidewalks at various locations. The second paving request is 47 blocks of 11 streets, [inaudible] the Pavement Condition here is all most as bad at 59 out of 100. This will construct new curb ramp jz repair side walk. Besy car michael crosswalk. Open a midblock cross wuck on sherman street connecting [inaudible] this emerged from a site visit with School Administrator squz Community Members and would identify engineering measure tooz improve safety and encourage studsant to walk and bike to school. Sfmta [inaudible] signage and daylighting alt the curb and traffic signal timing changes. Next elevator safety and reliability upgrades. This is for construction of companyhensive rehabilitation of 12 elevations at 4 muni metro stations. Funding comes from a place holdser for muni projects and this provides access to the subway stations which are a critical component of the rapid network. Finally, the muni bus lay over at daly bart station. We heard with this with prop aa project. This allocates funds to the bus layover project and this is contingents on the board programming for the funds. This will improve bus reliability and allow for increased service on the 14 r rounts. [inaudible] but barts thinks that will end up with the wash with the extra riders that the 14 r will bring. So, with that i can take any questions. Thank you very much for your presentation. Any questions or comments . Commissioner avalos. Thank you, just a question on the daly city stop for the 14 r. Areioaware of what the actual what people are paying to take muni to daly city bart and take daly city bart downtown . Is there a discount because they come on muni for that . Im not sure how that workwise the transfer. Just trying to remember what the deal was on that, so thats okay. Just the extension of the 14 to daly city bart helped a lot of residents in my district t is the quickest route to get downtown so i support the project. Great. Thank you very much. Seeing no other questions or comments well open up item 7 to Public Comment. Any members . Seeing none Public Comment is closed. If we can have a motion on that. Motion to approve. Thank you motion by commissioner avlease and seconded by commissioner cohen and take that without objection. Item aithd, please item 8 rail capacity strategy update. This is information item we have graham from sfmta. Good morning commissioner, graham [inaudible] thank you to tuque tauc about the work we are doing here. It is a start of major investment and near term actions mta can take to help improve the system today. Well go over the work and how we did it and dive into the recommendation or improvements we identified and where do we take this work from here. Anyone who rides the muni system regularlyly or those that ride it infrequently know it is crowded. It is [inaudible] in peak peerds and can be uncomfortable. There are many factors where a system doesnt meet the reliability goal squz this leads to a Customer Experience that is inadequate and doesnt meet expectations. This is todays condition in a city that is rapidly growing and added residents and employees all the time so we needed to think in 2013 how could we do something in the near term to address the issue while making sure we get ahead and think long term and how to plan for the City Residents and employees of the future so the rail capacity strategy is driven by 4 goals, cuchberage, couding, reliability and travel time. Those goals manifesten 3 buckets. The first is looking how to turn the dialthen near term 6789 we realize we cant deliver Major Investments in the next year or 2 or 3, butd in the next fifen years there are things we can do to provide impruchbments for the customers today. There is also a thinks at a system wide level we can try to deliver that will provide impruchments in the near term. This is again the start of the conversation in termoffs long term thinking. How might we think of a rail system for the future in San Francisco, what are the rough areas corridors that are High Priorities and the cost and think the path record of dlivy and what would that tell about the desires of a future rail system . Use basically a 3 sfep methodology of assess, develop and screen. On the assessment side we have existing information, ridership and forcast and forcast and land use, travel time and reliability factors in addition we convene thd rail capacity Technical Panel which is front line managers and people who know the system like it back of their hands and senior folks that are experts. This went through a line by line look of the issues and hang ups the sishm has today and what cause the head ache squz the opportunities to unlock the potential of the system. We went through developing concepts for those solution jz had a stakeholder system for long term ideas and screen these concepts based on our 4 goal outcomes we were looking for. As we went through the line by line review with the rail capacity Technical Panel we identified themes occurring and they are not unique but mta should consider whether state of good repair o