We really dealing with our racial biases that are, in many cases, built in and institutionalized . I think there was a myth out there for a while that racism was gonna die out that with the younger generation, less racists. Were gonna solve this problem. And i think this particular case shows that thats not true. And is it just an isolated case . I mean, the south carolinians did not rise up as this young man, dylann roof, hoped and start a revolution ousting africanamericans from the state. Theres always a miniscule percentage of young males who are losers and who have to blame their failure on somebody else. And thats probably true in every society, but in the united states, they have access to guns, so that, i think, is the particular problem. I mean, id like to see the federal government put as much investigative effort into tracking racial terrorists as religious terrorists. Why arent we doing that . President obama certainly was at the funerals on friday, along with the first lady and the vice president. It is a very disturbing issue for so many of us, and he spoke out on a radio broadcast. Listen to what the president had to say in his disappointment over this. And there became a furor over him using the n word. So, separate from the n word itself, are we making any progress, nia . Have we gotten very far . He went on in that interview actually, to compliment some of the progress in america and say, look, were not in the 1950s. Were not in the 1960s in selma, alabama. We have gotten somewhere, and its, you know, trackable that were getting there. But are we getting there fast enough . Well, its never fast enough for people who are impacted by it, so lets say that, number one, but, number two, this president has always said that weve made Great Strides and have been moving past some of the old racial paradigms, but to say that were totally cured when he was elected, there was an assumption by some that we had now moved into a colorblind society, but we still have institutional vestiges of racism of times past, even if you want to talk about something as simple as housing. I mean, when the g. I. Bill came out, you know, world war ii vets like my grandfather and his cohorts were not necessarily eligible for that money, and so that starts an inequality when it comes to wealth accumulation that continues to this day, and so when people say, oh, everyone has the same chance even steven thats not quite true, and were unpacking that and addressing it and looking at it not so much, oh, some people just want to be lazy, some people just want to complain. It is true that we are not the same country that we were. If we were, we would not have this panel here today. But it is also true that we are not where we would like to be under the highest ideals of our democracy. And, p. S. , this has raised a different issue for a lot of people. Would president obama himself have even been elected were he someone who looked more like his father, who was of african descent . Were he a darkerskinned man were he of not mixed race, would he have been the first africanamerican elected . Were white americans ready for that . Well, youre asking a question based on how he looks and i would suggest and were gonna commit some grammar here lookism goes well beyond race. So, if William Howard taft came along today, wouldnt be elected president of the united states. Were not gonna vote for someone whos morbidly obese, which is why candidates go on diets as theyre trying to be elected. And this question of institutional racism the institution keeps on shifting. Two illustrations. And, first of all, in terms of progress, george bush had two secretaries of state that were both black. Barack obama now has appointed a second consecutive black attorney general. When you look at where people of color and its not just black are represented you look at this thing in South Carolina. Its an indianamerican governor right . Who says weve got to take down this flag, flanked by a republican black senator. But the institutional racism when you get an organization that is accepted as legitimate in Public Discourse la raza, the race how does somebody get to say, i can appropriate the use of this tactic . I can call my organization the race in order to represent myself. But you better be careful what you say. And al sharpton how does al sharpton get to participate in public life given his record on racial tensions and strife . So, youre saying you cant have it both ways . You cant both use your race as something as a proponent of your issues and then say, but dont call me that color . You cant appropriate victimhood and you cannot assign guilt strictly based on color, because people still can overcome circumstance at birth. Belief counts. I just think if were going to have a discussion, were gonna have to be much more broadbased in the way were having it. And do you think that besides culture and besides laws and besides things that are rules built in to our society, families are still teaching racial concepts in a disappointing way, ajay . I think it will be another 20, 30 years before we flush out institutionalizing equality. I dont think were ever gonna be a utopia where racism doesnt exist. Of course not. That will not happen. But i think the effects of it will be dulled out over time. When you see a twotime president whos africanamerican, when you see a second attorney general, when you see an indianamerican governor, when you see a republican lawmaker whos a senator on these issues, that sets the tone that this is okay. Michael jordan made black beautiful, right . And it was okay to make bald beautiful, because he did it and the idea of bald heads seemed okay. It takes a while for that to become popular culture, and then everybody else just sort of says, thats okay. It will not be overnight, but you have to start. Yeah. Obama said were not gonna erase 200 or 300 years of treatment in a generation. What you have to do is you have to acknowledge the many steps that we have taken, yet not give up the fight to make sure that we march towards equality. And it will take time, because these biases are generated from birth on because families instill on it, and, also, when we go in the workforce, we see it all around us, but when we see that the face is changing, it also becomes a new mindset and that becomes a new reality. And, nia, when we see a Confederate Flag and this has long been a debate in the south, where the flag, for many people, also represents southern heritage, not just oppression of slavery, it does represent some historical measures for people but now, given what happened in charleston, the governor obviously of South Carolina and alabama both of those governors have now said, the time has come. We are past this point now, and no longer should we be flying the Confederate Flag. Is a symbol like that hurtful enough that it should be taken away . That symbol, of course, is hurtful. I mean, we dont fly the union jack in the northern states, where, at one time england ruled over here. We dont fly certain flags that would be offensive in other areas. Im not gonna get into nazi germany because some people say thats too inflamed, but heres the thing the Confederate Flag yes, it has a role in history, but it belongs in a historic museum. The Confederate Flag that went up in South Carolina did not go up because of what happened in history. It went up as a resistance. Defiance. To the civil rights movement. Exactly defiance. And when we talk about racism, its not necessarily something thats just overtly taught at home. Its things that are not directly disavowed. And so you let the little slips go and you dont call somebody out on things, and so these types of things are inbred, and what ends up happening children do not come here racist. They learn racism. So, there are subtleties that begin to build until theyre not so subtle. Absolutely. And if you dont have someone in a position of authority say, hey, lets look at this a different way, lets judge this in another kind of way, then that kind of thinking continues, and people say, oh, well, he was just an aberration and blah, blah, blah. But you can counter with patience and love. You should be able to. What you cant do is i dont want to presume what your point is, but my interpretation of it, at least is you cant have both sides arguing with loud voices their position without actually finding common ground, acknowledging that were making progress towards each other. And you have to recognize complexity, because nias right. That flag went up in South Carolina to push back against the civil rights movement. And it was democrats who put it up. Republicans are taking it down. Now, thats a trite observation because its a much more complex issue than all that. And a different democratic party. And how is it that we can see i mean, were seemingly as a nation, seeing clearly. I wont speak for everyone, but it seems there is a clear voice on whether highschool and College Football teams should not be called by indian names, indianamerican names anymore. We can clearly see that the benefit of the School Spirit versus hurting an entire culture thats been oppressed isnt worth it, and so weve changed the names of many of these although not all of them. How can people see the clearness of that and not the clarity of the flag . Well, wait a minute. So, lets talk a bout redskins because thats what its all about. Its about washington redskins. When the team was named, it wasnt an epithet. It was, in fact, to recognize someone who was of Indian Heritage who was well regarded by that organization. It was a point of pride. So, its to honor them . And for a very long time, it wasnt a problem. Then some people came along and said, i find that offensive. Heres the thing about the grievance industry it kicks into high gear, it is very uneven in how its applied, and you cant buy a Confederate Flag on many sites right now, but you can get a che guevara shirt, you can get nazi memorabilia. You can get lots of other things. But thats different. Thats not what were talking about. People can put any flag up in their backyard that they want. Absolutely. Its about statesanctioned no, i think monicas taking this broader. Were talking about official action on the part of state or local government. Tax dollars. Thats not the only thing were talking about. That should not happen, and we should be reassessing the whole history of the confederacy and the nature of its kind of racist nature. I think after the civil war, were trying to reconstruct the country, there was a tendency an understandable tendency to kind of softsoap the confederacy and just say, oh, this is just history. This is just heritage. But i think now were far enough away 150 years this year from the end of the civil war we can look back on it and say, that was a terrible racist regime, and the people who defended it were not good people. And we can also just say really quickly, on the northern end of it, its not as though they were all saviors. This was an economic means to break the south. Its not like you could come to the north and everyone was going to be be accepted. This was a way to break the south, and it just wasnt as exploited. As you pointed, its nostalgia for white supremacy. I think its a symbol of hate. Its a dog whistle. But the point, ed, just for your point maybe the redskins name was at a point when people who did not really understand all peoples opinion on it decided it was supposed to be a pride for heritage reasons. But if you now know that the majority of the native americans here are now offended by it, then why would you still hold on to that . I dont know that its a majority, but it certainly is a vocal one. And well have to leave it at that. We could talk about this for our whole broadcast, and it is an important topic well come back to. But we have two huge rulings by the u. S. Supreme court this past week. Lets talk about those, as well. The first one deals with obamacare, as its called. They upheld the Affordable Care act for 8. 7 million americans who could not have afforded healthcare or couldnt get access to it where they happened to live. And, obviously, president obama considered that a victory and part of his legacy. Opponents were upset and already say theyre going to appeal. Well get a reaction from some of you on that. And the second ruling was the u. S. Supreme court ruled that individual states cannot disallow a marriage that was a samesex marriage in one state and was fine here and then you move to the next state and its not allowed there, so, in effect, a National Ruling on samesex marriage upholding samesex marriage in all 50 states. Lets get a reaction on one or react on either one of those. I was gonna talk about samesex marriage because were talking about marriage equality. It is a momentous moment for this country a momentous moment. But it is an incredible moment of civil rights. Activism it has been really rapid. Right now were celebrating the 50th anniversary of when some of the earliest protests for gay rights happened right here in philadelphia, independence mall. And to go from 50 years to now seeing that who you love cannot just say, oh, well, thats not gonna be allowed here because we dont like this person, the fact of you guys getting together cause youre the same gender doesnt matter anymore. Now we are in a new phase of this country, and i think this is like an incredible moment when you really think about it. No matter where you are on this with your religion or what have you, for the state to come in and say, we have equality across the board it is a huge lift. A seminal moment. I think a lot of republicans, in their heart of hearts actually welcome both decisions because they know they were on the losing side of gay rights, and, you know, when they got to the general election, they were gonna pay a price. And, also, on the Affordable Care act, i mean, there would have been millions of people who lost their health coverage, mostly in republican states that didnt set up state exchanges, and i think a lot of republicans were not anxious to confront those voters. I think we dodged a bullet in that if the ruling had gone the other way on the Affordable Care act, not only would millions of people have lost their health coverage, but the people that stayed in there would have been just the sick, and it would have driven up the costs for everybody. The whole system would have collapsed from rising costs, so so, are you surprised, ed that the Supreme Court made such important rulings, whether you like the rulings or not . No, not at all. Not at all. Justice roberts communicated in the first decision on obamacare three years ago that there wasnt a chance that anyones gonna lay a hand on this. And he went to very Great Lengths just and scalia, i think, is spoton in how roberts, in essence, rewrote the statute three different ways just to try to make it fit because hes got this deference for congress intent. Now, how he judges its intent thats his business. Just a couple things, though its not that people dont have healthcare. Its the question of insurance the question of how we pay for this. And when youre looking at the people who enter the system because they now have insurance, take a look at all the people who lost their doctors, who wound up losing their insurance and are paying much more, to the point where they cant afford it. Thats the other part of this. Its not a perfect system. It doesnt bend the cost curve down. All right. Were gonna take a break. Inside story continues right after this. Inside story is presented by temple university. Temple fuels students with academics and opportunities to take charge. Plugged into the city, powered by the world. Temple. Edu takecharge. Heres to the explorers. Those diagnosed with cancer who didnt settle for just one opinion on their diagnosis or recommended treatment plan they explored their options. And discovered a new level of empowerment. At Cancer Treatment centers of america in philadelphia, thats what we doempower our patients with a comprehensive second opinion. And because time is of the essence, we do it a single one day. Explore your options with a oneday second opinion. Learn more at cancercenter. Com eastern. Welcome back. Time to talk politics president ial politics and the g. O. P. Field is really big. 16 now have entered the field, or about to on tuesday, when governor Chris Christie of new jersey reportedly will throw his hat in. Bobby jindal of louisiana has long been talking about this and how is in. Donald trump is in. Whats interesting is a new survey of at least those who are in shows jindal at the bottom, tied for last, donald trump tied for second in some of the polls, so where does it leave republicans, ajay . Well, i think right now we have 13 declared candidates, 15 to go. They did not include none of the above, which was ahead of bobby jindal. But i think youll have 18 candidates all vying for attention. Donald trump is a mere blip. I mean, that is not really relevant. I dont think hell be a sustainable type of a candidate. But i think what this does is it coalesces in the long run more support for guys like jeb bush and more viable candidates because youll have too much of the fringe candidates coming in. It solidifies the base. It solidifies the money going into ones that most likely will be viable after the primary. Or some people would say it muddies the waters and so many voices can make for a cacophony of sound. You just dont even know what they want anymore. Theres a reason why there are so many candidates, and the reason is barack obama. Barack obama demonstrated that not only do you have to be a senior statesman to run for president. You dont have to be a Richard Nixon or a george h. W. Bush to run for president. And, indeed, its actually beneficial to have a short record, cause theres less for your opponents to aim at. And people learned that lesson from president obama, and so people say now, why not me . More importantly, i think go ahead, nia. If you look at what happened in 2012, everybody rose to the top at one point and then fell back down to the bottom, and then we finally settled with mitt romney. And as far as donald trump being number 2 in the polls, i only have three words 999. Remember him herman cain . I mean, really, we had a lot of crazies that kind of bubbled up, went down, bubbled up, went down. Wait for for a minute. Youre not gonna have 10 people. I think the bar is lower because of the