The next 100 days will be just like the first. We will discuss taxes, the health care in economy when Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. Its a Fox News Sunday exclusive. Plus north korea defies the world with another missile test as President Trump issues this stark warning. If President Trump a chance that we could end up having a major, major conflict with north korea. Absolutely. Chris we will ask our sunday panel if theres a way for President Trump to halt north Koreas Nuclear program. And our power player of the week, using high tech to solve crimes. All right now on Fox News Sunday. Chris and hello again from fox news in washington. President trump capped his 100th day in office with a rally last night in harrisburg, pennsylvania, touting his accomplishments while the press corps was back in washington for the white house Correspondents Dinner, mr. Trump was with thousands of supporters and he wasnt subtle about it. President trump i could not possibly be more thrilled then to be more than 100 miles away from washington, spending my evening with all of you and with a much, much larger crowd in a much better people. Right . Chris the president reaches the 100 day milestone as he takes another shot at replacing obamacare, a major tax overhaul and addresses rising tensions with north korea, and thats where we will begin with President Trumps National Security advisor general h. R. Mcmaster. General, welcome back to Fox News Sunday. Gen. Mcmaster next, chris, its a pleasure to be here with you. If could end up, his words, in a major conflict with north korea and our later cited a warning, north korea conducts another ballistic launch. Isnt that a deliberate provocation to this president , isnt that open defiance . Gen. Mcmaster it is open defiance, its open defiance of the international community. North korea poses a great threat to the United States, our great allies in the region, south korea in particular, but also to china and others. Its important for all of us to confront this regime, this regime that is pursuing the weaponization of a missile with a nuclear weapon. This is something that we know we cannot tolerate. The president has made clear that he is going to resolve this issue one way or the other. What we prefer to do his work with others, try to included to resolve this situation short of military action. Chris both the of state have been going around the region in asia and announcing that the era of strategic patients is over. Now north korea has responded with not one but two Ballistic Missile test that both failed, but still they went ahead with a missile test. Doesnt that mean since you say that the era of strategic patients is over, that you have to do something . Gen. Mcmaster yes, we do have to do something, so we have to do something with partners in the region and globally. That involves enforcement of the sanctions that are in place. It may mean ratcheting up though sanctions even further. It also means being prepared for military operations if necessary. Chris i want to go back to Something Else the president said, because in an interview this weekend with John Dickerson on face the nation he said he wont be happy if north korea conducts a nuclear test. Do you and the white house distinguish between a nuclear test and a longrange missile test, do you see one threatening . Gen. Mcmaster they are both threatening. Developing a Nuclear Capability has to be matched to a delivery system. It is the sixth nuclear test, is what it would be combined with the initial program that poses a grave threat to the United States and our citizens as well as our friends and partners in the region. Chris you talk about china and our allies or other regional powers getting involved in this. President trump keeps saying hes developed a special relationship with president xi that he very much hopes that the president will apply greater pressure, ratchet up the pressure on north korea, having said that, here is with the Chinese Foreign minister said this week at the united nations. Take a look. China is not a focal point on the peninsula. The key to solving the Nuclear Issue on the peninsula does not like in the hands of the chinese. Chris he says north korea is not chinas responsibility. Gen. Mcmaster he might want to talk to his president , who during the summit with President Trump acknowledged that this is a great threat, not just to the United States but a may be even more so to china. He showing his willingness to take ownership of the problem and recognize that they have to act to help resolve this proble problem, problem short of military conflict. His development of a relationship with president xi and the discussions that led them to understand that this is a place where u. S. And chinese interests overlap and at the same time the president has reinvigorated and strengthened our alliances with key nations in the region. Chris do you see china actually doing something . Gen. Mcmaster yes, we do see china starting to do something. We see that the public statements, youve seen it in the chinese p strident and stringent enforcement of existing u. N. Sanctions, but it is clear, more needs to be done. We are going to ask china to do more as we do more, as our south korean and japanese allies really all nations have to take a look at this regime. Its already isolated itself, but to further isolate it financially and also diplomatically, to make clear that none of us can accept a north korea with a nuclear weapon, and by the way, north korea hasnt developed this for defensive reasons, they said they want to use it to blackmail nations and be declared with the intent to sell them openly. Chris i want to talk about the military option because you are saying thats on the table. Ive been to the region, im sure youve been to the region. You go to the demilitarized zone, its 30 miles from seoul. They have thousands of short seoul, an metropolis of 25 Million People and military troops. If we were to strike against their nuclear program, against their missile program, we are talking about human catastrophe, arent we . Gen. Mcmaster yes, and this is why the presidency, this is something we dont want to have to do, but what this president has done is hes now connected our military options with what we are trying to politically. Which amongst those two things were disconnected from each other, explaining the viable option, the military option to help make what you were doing diplomatic way, economically, with sanctions, viable, to be able to resolve the problem short of what would be what the president called a major, major war and humanitarian catastrophe. Chris precisely to the point, can you envision a situation where north korea becomes such a threat that we are willing to take that risk of short range missiles hitting soul, in metropolis with millions of people connects me to the president has first and foremost o the American People. Gen. Mcmaster i dont think anyone thinks it would be acceptable to have this kind of regime with Nuclear Weapons that can target and range to the United States. Chris President Trump, changing just a little bit, but same region, said this week that south korea should pay for the Missile Defense system that we have installed their, 1 billion. There is a report today that you called your south korean counterpart said no, the old agreement was that with the United States play that billion dollars and we will stick by that. Is that true . Gen. Mcmaster of the last thing i would ever do is contradict the president of the United States. Thats not what it was. In fact, what i told our south korean counterpart is in a negotiation that the deal is in place. We will agree to work but with the president has asked us to do is to look across all of our alliances and to have responsibilitysharing. We are are looking at that with a great aleck south korea. What youre saying because of the president s leadership, more and more nations are contributing more to our collective defense. Chris the question of who pays the billion dollars is up in the air. Gen. Mcmaster the question is what is the relationship going forward, it will be renegotiated as its going to be with all of our allies. With the has said is will prioritize american Citizens Security and interests. To do that we need strong alliances. But also to do that effectively, and a way that is sustainable economically, we need everybody to pay their fair share. Chris i want to talk about another trouble spot. The state department has just certified that iran is complying with the nuclear deal, the terms of the specific field, but it was also made clear that the United States is going to be much tougher when it comes to other iranian actions and the support of with the west, our allies dropping most of their sanctions and now in business doing business eagerly with iran. Arent we the ones who are marginalized, even if we wanted to get tough with iran, do we really have leverage to enforce our will, to back up our threats . Gen. Mcmaster i think we certainly do. I think all we have to do is pull the curtain back on iranian behavior. This isnt a regime that is supporting this is a regime that is supporting the murderous regime in syria. This is a regime that is really applying what you might call it has below model to the greater middle east. They have depended on the land for support. Chris i dont doubt that they are bad actors, my question is can we enforce sanctions when our allies are not interested in doing that . Gen. Mcmaster i think our allies are interested in what youre saying, what has happened in the last eight years, u. S. Policy has unwittingly empowered and across the middle east. Now we are seeing the effect of that with the humanitarian political protest of the in the middle east. Whats critical now is a shift in that policy to confront iran and what youre saying is because of the president s leadership, really strong relationships across and i think theres going to be a tremendous opportunity to confront their destructive behavior in the region and beyond the region. Chris two more quick questions for you. President trump came into office talk about hoping to improve relations with russia, but over this first 100 days, i want to put this up on the screen weve learned that russia has violated the inf missile treaty, they defended syrian president and now they are now arming the taliban in afghanistan, oftentimes against us. In these 100 days, have relations with the kremlins gotten better or worse . Gen. Mcmaster i dont think ive gotten rea better or worse. The russian behavior as weve seen, ukraine, the support for this murderous regime in syria and now arming the taliban. These are all things that are clearly cut against russian interest, especially in that relationship with assad in syria. None of these groups are not monolithic. In the taliban case, they overlap with groups like the Islamic Movement of those passing whos pakistan. Here you have a russian president acting against the russian peoples interest in doing what i think doing it kind of reflexively. Can we shift the relationship such that there is room for cooperation in key areas where our interests overlap . Gen. Mcmaster t now. Gen. Mcmaster we need changes in words on the nature of the relationsp, really need to see his change in behavior. Chris final question, 100 days end, is there a trump doctrine in Foreign Policy that is taking shape . We clearly seen with the president , more willing to use force than barack obama was both in the missile strike in syria, which got it up on the screen. If also that huge moab bombs dropped and examine stand. He doesnt seem to back that up with a Clear Strategy and fighting isis, winning the war in afghanistan. Gen. Mcmaster his strategy is to advocate for the security and interests of the American People every day and to ensure that we are doing all we can to advance our security in the interest of the American People. If you see that with the acceleration of the campaign against isis. In iraq, and syria, also you see that with a very effective operations against isis and afghanistan, you see that with combining of military force when necessary, with diplomatic and economic actions. Not regarding military force as separate from what we want to achieve politically. I would say its competing, recognizing that we are in competitions, interests are at stake and advocating for the security of the American People and our interests. He also has devolved responsibility down to where it belongs. The white house is no longer deploying three helicopter somewhere or having a strict cap on forces so that you deploy helicopters but dont send mechanics with them. Contract guards, hes doing things that have made our policy execution much more sensible. Chris let the commanders in the field determine what they need . Gen. Mcmaster yes, with civilian oversight, with policy direction and with the president ensuring that we are combining what we do it militarily to what we want to achieve politically and are diplomatic and economic efforts all in chris thank you for your time today. Youre a straight talker. I would love to have you back to talk some more about all of this. Gen. Mcmaster pleasure being with you. Chris we will be tracking what happens in the north Korean Peninsula this week. Coming up, senates top Democrat Chuck schumer gives his assessment of the president s first 100 days. She responds to charges of democratic obstruction. Sfx engine revving silence say carl, we have a question about your brokerage fees. Fees . What did you have in mind . I dont know. 4. 95 per trade . Uhhh. And i was wondering if your brokerage offers some sort of guarantee . Guarantee . Where we can get our fees and commissions back if were not happy. So can you offer me what schwab is offering . Whats with all the questions . Ask your broker if theyre offering 4. 95 online equity trades and a satisfaction guarantee. If you dont like their answer, ask again at schwab. Were on to you, diabetes. Times up, insufficient prenatal care. And administrative paperwork. Your days of drowning people are numbered. Same goes for you, budget overruns. And rising costs, wipe that smile off your face. Were coming for you, too. For those who wont rest until the world is healthier, neither will we. Optum. How well gets done. Chris tens of thousands of demonstrators in the washington heat saturday protesting President Trumps Climate Policies on his office. The president says he is willing to work with democrats on health care and other issues, but the top democrat in the senate says mr. Trump must change his approach if he wants help from the other side of the aisle. Joining us now from new york, the Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer. Senator, welcome back to Fox News Sunday. Senator schumer good to be back, chris. Chris you and the president has been in quite the war of words these last few day days. Heres what the president had to say what about you last night in harrisburg. President trump humor Dominic Schumer is weak on crime and wants to raise your taxes through the roof. He is a poor leader, ive known him a long time, and hes leading the democrats to doom. If chris weak on crime, raising taxes, leading the democrats to doom. Your response . Senator schumer look, the president , name calling doesnt work. Lets look at values, lets look at issues. I would say the president s first hundred days have hardly been a success. Hes broken promises to the working people of america, unfulfilled others. When he campaigned he campaigned as a populist against the democratic and republican establishments. Hes governing like someone from the hard right, wealthy special interest. Let me go over a few areas. Entree, he promised to be tough, backed off on china, backed off on mexico, on buy america. We have a good, strong bill, theyve backed off that, a lot of this deal and infrastructure and water is going to be made overseas. On health care, he said he covered more people at less cost, his belt is just the opposite. Maybe the worst is draining the swamp. His last days he said wall street wont be in washington. There are more in this cabinet and others, he did on the swamp is allowing lobbies to work in the administration on issues they lobbied on and they get the secret. If theres been promise after promise that has been either unfulfilled or broken. On infrastructure we sent him a trillion dollar path, explain, we havent heard a peep out of him. The bottom line is very simple, the president , if he works with us, particularly on issues like trade and infrastructure, but on the issue so far, taxes and health care, he doesnt insult us at all, he puts together a plan thats very hard right, special interest, wealthy. Then he says your way to be bipartisan is to support his plan. Thats not how america works. Chris senator, the Trump White House says a lot of what you say. This is not new, youve been saying this for a while now, you gave him an f on lets take a look. On creating jobs for the middle class, they note that he has signed executive orders to cut regulations and red tape. Pull out of trade deals that he says heard america and build the keystone and