WindAction | Environmentalists criticize public feedback pro

WindAction | Environmentalists criticize public feedback process for deciding future site of port for offshore wind industry

Environmentalists are criticizing a yearlong process meant to gather public feedback on where to build a deepwater offshore wind port, calling it a “charade.” They say Maine officials have failed to adequately engage the public or tribal communities and effectively decided where to build the port long before the process began. The Maine Department of Transportation has been making an internal case for Sears Island while “giving an illusion of an impartial analysis of port possibilities to the public,” said Matt Cannon, the state conservation and energy director for Sierra Club Maine, in comments at the final meeting of the Offshore Wind Port Advisory Group.

Related Keywords

Sears Island , Maine , United States , Islesboro , Penobscot Bay , Searsport , Bath Iron Works , Mack Point , Gulf Of Maine , Matt Burns , Moffat Nichol , David Italiaander , Jim Therriault , Paul Merrill , Caleb Jackson , Becky Layton Bartovics , Rolf Olsen , National Environmental Permitting Act , Sprague Energy , Maine Coast Heritage , Maine Department Of Transportation , Maine Port Authority , Wind Port Advisory Group , Islesboro Islands , Renewable Energy Port Of The , Sierra Club Maine , Facebook , Maine Department , Matt Cannon , Offshore Wind Port Advisory , Islesboro Islands Trust , Governor Mills , Renewable Energy Port , Stakeholder Plan , Bruce Van Note , Iron Works , Eastern Trail , New England , Maine Port , Inflation Reduction Act , Maine Coast Heritage Trust , Kate Cough , Maine Monitor , Offshore Wind ,

© 2025 Vimarsana