Page 22 - 19th Amendment News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Political power. aaron, we are still waiting on a trend that so many people are tweeting about. i hope apocalypse is not your what when it comes to who got next. >> that is not my what but just to echo, absolutely, what fernand said. i work for a newsroom made for the 19th amendment. voting rights is absolutely a women's rights issue and i have been and continue to be going into 2022, something for me to look forward to in 2022 personally and for those of you not just following me on twitter looking for an apocalypse. i'll take a cue from jason and manifest this. very much looking forward to t...

Their most difficult time. women with their faith leader, their family, and their health provider should be the ones that make decisions about the next steps for them during a pregnancy. what has happened in the supreme court, the court that was bought by donald trump, the conservative lopsided 6-3 court, that court that should be expanded, is that they ignored something that is sacred for those of us who are lawyers. we're taught in first-year law school that precedence is standing as law of the land. it is to be respected under the 9th amendment, roe v. wade became precedent. and two of the ...

That's what a constitution is. but the argument that mississippi was presenting and many of the conservatives seem sympathetic to was abortion is just like any other law, we should leave it to the states. >> you have a legal point of view that the court in effect made up a right to abortion, right, and a right to privacy not mentioned explicitly in the constitution, they basically said it's implied in the constitution. where is the law on this? how does the law on this right compare to others that are specifically delineated in the constitution? >> well, you know, the supreme court, since its ...

President will sign it. you cannot allow the constitution to be violated. this is a 9th amendment right, a right to privacy and a right to due process under the amendments. what is happening in the supreme court is a crapshoot, if you will. it means we're throwing the dice. we have a 6-3 court. we seem some possibilities, but you know what, i wonder if justice kavanagh is going to adhere to what he said under oath, that he viewed roe v. wald as precedent. if he did, that means the supreme court does the right thing. if they don't, the filibuster needs to go and we need to codify roe v. wade in...

However, in 1803, in the famous case of marjorie versus madison, chief justice john marshall said it's the province and duty of the supreme court to say what the law is, and that's been the constitution's interpretation for the last 200-plus years. so there are lots of areas where the supreme court goes beyond the written words of the constitution. it says nothing about carrying a picket sign, but that is considered freedom of speech under the constitution. lots of areas like that. but this is a battleground. you know, whether so-called unenumerated rights, rights that are not specifically men...