About Panetta News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

In 2009 they proposed 40,000 troops to go to afghanistan the president pressed and reduced it to 32,000 without good reason. if they said this night we have this six hour rule and we can't get asset there's. he could have said we don't have ship is off the shore or helicopters. >> i guess that indicates you don't have much trust in secretary about panetta and clinton alike. i guess the president having appointed him thinks these are good people who care about american assets and american life and especially the life of an ambassador. i mean it is just like the syria situation we are discussion...

In 2009 they proposed 40,000 troops to go to afghanistan the president pressed and reduced it to 32,000 without good reason. if they said this night we have this six hour rule and we can't get asset there's. he could have said we don't have ship is off the shore or helicopters. >> i guess that indicates you don't have much trust in secretary about panetta and clinton alike. i guess the president having appointed him thinks these are good people who care about american assets and american life and especially the life of an ambassador. i mean it is just like the syria situation we are discussion...

In 2009 they proposed 40,000 troops to go to afghanistan the president pressed and reduced it to 32,000 without good reason. if they said this night we have this six hour rule and we can't get asset there's. he could have said we don't have ship is off the shore or helicopters. >> i guess that indicates you don't have much trust in secretary about panetta and clinton alike. i guess the president having appointed him thinks these are good people who care about american assets and american life and especially the life of an ambassador. i mean it is just like the syria situation we are discussion...