Page 36 - Acquit News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

$1 million to end her case against mr epstein. in the settlement, she agreed to release, acquit, satisfy and forever discharge epstein from the claims. the wording goes on to cover any other person who could have been a potential defendant. it is so wide she promises not to bring any further case, dating from the beginning of the world. prince andrew's says that means he couldn't be sued but some say it is too vague to be enforceable.- it is too vague to be enforceable. , , ., ., enforceable. this is one of the most bizarre _ enforceable. this is one of the most bizarre pieces _ enforceable. t...

But today's new york hearing focuses on the 2009 legal document. back then, ms giuffre, seen here at court in new york, accepted $500,000 to end her original case against epstein. in the settlement, virginia giuffre agreed to release, acquit, satisfy, and forever discharge epstein from further claims. the wording goes on to cover any other person who could have been a potential defendant. it's so wide, she promises not to bring any further case dating from the beginning of the world. prince andrew's lawyers say that means he can't be sued. but one lawyer who's represented some of epstein's all...

SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) — Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes was convicted on four counts of fraud and conspiracy Monday, ending a lengthy trial that has captivated Silicon Valley. The

Maxwell dated in the 1990s. the two remained close after the relationship ended. epstein himself later faced charges of running a sex trafficking ring. he took his life in prison while awaiting trial in 2019. so now it is ghislaine maxwell's turn to answer for the crimes, and having just celebrated her 60th birthday in prison, she could spend the rest of her life behind bars. randi kaye, cnn, palm beach county, florida. cnn legal analyst tereasa martin joins me from los angeles. good to see you. >> hi, john. >> the jury took five days before reaching a guilty verdict. the common thinking was...

They're asking for transcripts, points of clarification that arose during the trial. i wouldn't read anything into it. >> some people might think, these are long deliberations. we're looking at the potential for a hung jury. to those who think that, what would you say to them? >> it's the right question to ask. what a lot of people don't appreciate is that in order to convict or acquit, a jury has to be unanimous. 12-0 to acquit. 12-0 to convict. and so jurors, after long or complex trials, work through the evidence. they do it, i think, the right way, slowly, carefully, deliberately. if they ...