Stay updated with breaking news from Action error. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Compare and contrast the two weapons. they also have access to a laptop. it has the body-camera video downloaded on the laptop but internet access has been disabled. about three hours into deliberations, members of the jury wanted to know the date potter met with dr. miller. you may recall, miller was the psychologist the witness the defense called on who talked about action error. during that interview, which was conducted via zoom, potter told dr. miller she didn t make mistakes. john? interesting. adrienne broaddus, thanks so much for being there for us. please, keep us posted. coming up. the former president does what he likes to do sue other people. while he is filed suit against the attorney general of new york, next. ....
Defense psychologist. the the guy that the prosecution argued was, um, the hired gun, you know, testifying just for the purpose of trial. and and the jurors asked, um, when was he when did he interview potter? and that goes translation, you know, that goes to credibility. do we believe what he says about an action error? um, can we believe him? or was he just hired for trial as the prosecution argued? and when you put that together with the other two questions, it tells us that they are struggling with the reasonableness of the mistake and this idea of her consciousness of that mistake. did she really believe that she had a taser when she had a glock and they were so vastly different? and that brings us to the second question yesterday of you know trying to actually physically examine and and observe the gun. so when you take these three questions, um, in in in the aggregate, john, i think it s pretty clear that the struggle is with reasonableness of the mistake and con ....
That. but you know, it s so difficult to tell what is going on with the jury. why they are taking so long. um, even though o mara-azari dream team with 55-plus years of trial experience can t really say for certain but the three questions that we have gotten over the past thee days and we can t forget about question one on monday um, are very important. and to me, they are really one compound question. that question on monday was about the testimony of the defense psychologist. the the guy that the prosecution argued was, um, the hired gun, you know, testifying just for the purpose of trial. and and the jurors asked, um, when was he when did he interview potter? and that goes translation, you know, that goes to credibility. do we believe what he says about an action error? um, can we believe him? or was he just hired for trial as the prosecution argued? and when you put that together with the other two questions, it tells us that they are struggling with the reasonableness ....
Officer like her to make that mistake. they re struggling with that, which was the reason for the defense in putting on that raw, emotional testimony. unzipping the glock, which was the second question, ana, is so they can actually feel and observe the physical evidence firsthand, not just rely on the testimony they heard, to determine whether, is that mistake reasonable or not? so i think the questions were very telling, and the fact they came up with the first question a couple days ago about that action error expert that testified for the defense is also part of the same scenario, which is, was her mistake reasonable? was she conscious of having pulled her glock versus the taser? right. and we know they ve been deliberating another four hours or so today. i wonder at what point would the judge allow the jury to just stop deliberations if they can t reach a consensus and really are deadlocked? yeah, so judge chu yesterday didn t do what some judges do ....
Was an action error, you know, anyone well, first of all, it s not any human. it is an officer of 26 years of experience who has had training and has had certifications and recertifications. so um, but it seems to me like it might be working. mark, just finally, look, we always talk about the effect weekends have on juries and having them reach a decision. i mean, this is this is christmas coming up here. they re they re going to have a decision tomorrow. i hate guessing because we always want to be a fly on the wall but they are not going to spend her time on this and if they don t get a decision tomorrow, by noon or 1:00 or 2:00 in the afternoon, they may very well hang. mark o mara, sarah azari, interesting discussion. thank you so much for your insight. thanks, john. happy holidays if i don t see you. so breaking news on the january 6th committee involving michael flynn, the former president s embattled national security adviser. the details, ahead. oh no. ....