Page 4 - Adver News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Adver adversa adversaries? he has to recognize that his words have an impact. they can be positive or undercutting of our national security. >> how do you work together after this? >> i think it's hard. i think there's a fundamental underlying reason here that goes beyond just the war of words. i believe that the intelligence community continues to have deep concerns about donald trump's continued alignment with vladimir putin even at a time when they tell them that vladimir putin is actively undermining our democracy. donald trump has other national security ideas that put him at fundamental ...

Terrestrial, collection by aircraft, collection by hums, whatever it is. so the trick is, how do you make all the cylinders work together and in harmony. >> the seemingly limitness number of threats and adver adversaries. >> tell me how inundated with all this threat intel how you unwind. >> when i was in the pentagon as the undersecretary of the director of intelligence. i would have a few people in and have a beer or a glass of wine and i would have a martini. this job, every night. >> it is a daunting channel. combatting both the enemies you know and those you don't on battlefields and in t...

We are not ending the program, we are preserving it for the most part in the out years. we'll face the challenge of an iran if it hasn't changed its stripes in the last 20 years, in 10 or 12 years where they can break out, but the sanctioning will have largely been relieved. they with have a greater defensive posture, and then our choice what is it? to try to snap back the sanctions you say won't work now to stam them from pursuing that goal? it seems to me if i'm going to immediate an adver sears, i want to meet them at their weakest, not when they're stronger. >> i'm being told you are being...

Easy, but right now i'm more concerned about the results of their limited action. >> shepard: in the last 30 second is have gotten the following. the syrian foreign minister just said that damascus, meaning the syrian government, supports the russian initiative and wants to hand over all of its chemical weapons. of course, we already know that it would be incumbent upon the united states and allies to rule out the use of force. do you wonder, as i am wondering as this is developing, why we would ever entertain such a thing? i think it goes without saying we would not. >> i completely agree. an...

O ofascersead. as you n sewhat lefof talniea oft inrs thed.iddlof t fie u se att thefe. t the in pheot adlhe tie wpons th stemoper or wee on a p a roin t wininns fght he temerhe w on t we dow less tan milro tin ft fromheir t he seweow es th cau til o the omir cra i sll th au unr oinveheigatn. >>n grargia s unanti aan ve at nt i u>>er w g foria a dver tio sh a a 4- ar-o boy in u wor a dcaser sh ooad4--ooyge. he sed thgun ke ts. oad. e thn t >> hwas sho ihe >> hsho bacide i inde h mom' acminien. shwas owin hm'omoveni shts a gen ght.ov othedriv losit. t howo yofeelig g now? t. >>hei feiv osbe.er....