Page 3 - Ag Raprocesses News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Said what do you think about miranda? >> everyone else does it so your answer is no? >> it's a combination of my respect for precedent, nominee precedent and my respect for judicial independence. so i can't give assurances on a specific hypothetical. >> let me go on to another subject which is executive privilege. executive privilege is a principle that is founded in the constitution and the separation of powers, correct? >> the supreme court so ruled in the united states versus richard nixon case. that was the first -- the key issue in the united states -- >> that's all right. i just need the...

Says, cases in controversies. and that means there's a process. litigants come in to the federal trial court. and, for example, litigate against one another. and there's a process there. a trial or summary judgment motion that the district judge renders a decision. then that comes up to the court of appeals. in my case. and there's briefing and oral argument. i like to say there's a process. i like to say process protects you. it's one of my things i always like to keep in mind. you go through a process to help make good decisions, deliberative process. and we have a process. judges are very f...

Undocumented who would unionize to protect themselves in the workplace. you went out of your way to dissent all the way along and make sure they didn't, in your view, not have that right that they did not have that right to unionize. >> very respectfully disagree, senator. and the reason i disagree is the supreme court did say that the immigrant was covered under the definition of nlra. if it ends there i'm with you 147b 100%. then the supreme court goes on to say, the conflict between the national labor relations act and the immigration laws, it makes clear as i read it, if the immigration la...

Where an overbroad ruling may resolve things that people who are affected by it may have thought, i wasn't part of that case. why am i now affected in a particular way. i think one of the things i can say about how i've tried to write my opinions, the 300 opinions, is i'm always concerned about -- i'm always concerned about unintended consequences. this is one of the reasons i go through so many drafts in my opinions and really work through them is really even just a sloppy footnote or an ambiguous word in an opinion, it's true when drafting laws here, too. but -- if you don't -- you're concer...

Immediately. judge kavanaugh, you bent over backwards to take the company's side against these workers. in a 2008 d.c. circuit case, agra processor versus nlrb, your dissent argued the company's workers should be prohibited from unionizing because they did not fit your definition of an employee. to reach this conclusion, you imported a definition of employee from a totally different statute. you ignored the plain language of the controlling statute, the national labor relations act, which has a broad definition of employee as well as blinding supreme court precedent. the majority in this case,...