Latest Breaking News On - Shirtan decision - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180905:17:19:00

the majority in agra processors was following supreme court precedent. in shirtan case, the supreme court, a 7-2 decision, said undocumented immigrants are employees under the national labor relations act. since undocumented aliens are not among the few groups of workers expressly exempted by congress, they plainly come within the broad statutory definition of employee. that s a quote from the case. that s part 2a. go to part 2b. let me tell you people that went to both parts. everyone else who looked at this question, the administrative law judge, the national labor relations board, including republican appointees, two appeals court judges, including one republican appointee, followed the supreme court precedent and came to the opposite conclusion that you did. i understand you may have preferred the shirtan dissent, but you failed to follow supreme court precedent. this was a case where the national labor relationsing at, included those who were

Supreme courtShirtan decisionSupreme court precedentNational labor relations actShirtan caseAg raprocessesPart 2bPart 2aAdministrative law judgeEveryone elseAppeals court judgesVersus nlrbLabor relationsing at

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180905:17:50:00

you. i have always had a little bit of a problem with that line because we re infallible because we re final. no, both parts of that are wrong in some sense because i never want to think of the court i never want to think of the court as infallible and never want to think of it necessarily in the way you re describing it either. because the people always have the ability to correct through the amendment process. now the amendment process is hard and hasn t been used as much in recent decades but, of course, at the beginning of the country, the amendments were critical and dred scott, of course, the awful example of a horrific supreme court decision that is then corrected, in part, at least on paper, in the 14th amendment, 13, 14th amendments. and that s an important example, i think, of probably the best example, frankly, of the point you re making about the people being able to respond to

Supreme court of the united statesHorrific supreme courtAmendment processAmendment process is hard and hasn tShirtan decision14th amendmentDred scott

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180905:17:33:00

says, cases in controversies. and that means there s a process. litigants come in to the federal trial court. and, for example, litigate against one another. and there s a process there. a trial or summary judgment motion that the district judge renders a decision. then that comes up to the court of appeals. in my case. and there s briefing and oral argument. i like to say there s a process. i like to say process protects you. it s one of my things i always like to keep in mind. you go through a process to help make good decisions, deliberative process. and we have a process. judges are very focused on process. and having that oral argument. having the briefing. and then talking to your colleagues. you change your mind, you know, senator. you ve been a judge, of course. you change your mind sometimes based on the comments of colleagues. that process is important. then to your point about deciding that case, you write an opinion. you re not trying to resolve

Due processTrial courtSummary judgment motionShirtan decisionOral argumentDistrict judgeCourt of appealsNumber oneAg raprocessesDissenting opinionJohn mccain

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180905:17:05:00

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180905:17:05:00
vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Ag raprocessesImmigration sponsorsLife decisionShirtan decisionJane doeState lawCrisis pregnancy center

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180905:17:53:00

14th amendment which guarantee ed equal protection. and they said what is this amendment but that the law should be the same for the black and the white and the supreme court, unfortunately, backtracked from that clear principle and the plessi decision and a horrific decision, which allowed separate but equal and then brown versus board corrected that in 1954, of course, corrected it on paper. it s decades and we re still seeking to achieve racial equality, the long march for racial equality is not over. brown versus board, as i ve said publicly, many times before, the single greatest moment in supreme court in many ways, the

14th amendmentEd equal protectionSupreme courtShirtan decisionLong marchBrown versus board of educationGreatest moment in supreme court