Federal Circuit Review | March 2024 | Knobbe Martens
Defining Indefiniteness: When Are Claim Limitations Contradictory? In Maxell, Ltd., v. Amperex Technology Limited, Appeal No. 23-1194, the Federal Circuit held that two...
Stay updated with breaking news from Aligned Vision. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Defining Indefiniteness: When Are Claim Limitations Contradictory? In Maxell, Ltd., v. Amperex Technology Limited, Appeal No. 23-1194, the Federal Circuit held that two...
VIRTEK VISION INTERNATIONAL ULC, v. ASSEMBLY GUIDANCE SYSTEMS, INC., DBA ALIGNED VISION - Before Moore, Hughes, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board...
Harris Brumfield v. IBG LLC, Appeal No. 2022-1630 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2024) In our case of the week, the Federal Circuit addressed three issues in a dispute that dates ba...
In a precedential decision authored by Chief Judge Moore, the Federal Circuit on Wednesday partially reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling that certain claims of Virtek Vision International’s patent were unpatentable, finding the Board erred as a matter of law in its analysis.
This is part of a series of articles discussing recent orders of interest issued in patent cases by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts.