Missouri Bill Would Create Process to Review and Reject Unconstitutional Federal Acts
He legislation would authorize the General Assembly and the Attorney General to review and prohibit the implementation of certain federal actions within the state.
Stay updated with breaking news from Anti Commandeering. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
He legislation would authorize the General Assembly and the Attorney General to review and prohibit the implementation of certain federal actions within the state.
"You have to do whatever the feds say because of the supremacy clause!" This is such a bad interpretation of the supremacy clause that even the Supreme Court disagrees.
A bill introduced in the Iowa House would create a process to end state enforcement of a federal executive order or a decision of a federal court. But the legislation needs an amendment to make it effective in practice.
The proposed law would prohibit any employee of a state agency from releasing personal identifying information (PPI) that is not already publicly available for the purpose of investigating for, participating in, cooperating with, or assisting in federal immigration enforcement. The law would also apply to motor vehicle records. State agencies could release PPI in order to comply with a court-issued subpoena, warrant, or order.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (April 13, 2021) – Last week, the Tennessee House passed a bill to create a process to beg the federal government not to enforce unconstitutional executive orders. While supporters of the bill claim it will help them defend the constitution, passage of this bill will do absolutely nothing of the sort. Rep. Mark Hall (R-Cleveland) introduced House Bill 1120 (HB1120) on Feb 10. Even as introduced, the language wasn’t particularly strong. It empowered the joint government operations committee of the legislature to review presidential executive orders at its discretion. It co...