Page 8 - Arbitration Clauses News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

More hearings. the judiciary committee ought to be having hearings. i've been frustrated by the slow pace of the investigation. i think it has to be accelerated. >> i want to talk to you about what's going on with uber because i know you are very concerned about this. a cnn exclusive this week found that there have been 103 uber drivers who have been accused of sexual assault in the past four years. you are -- the reason the public doesn't know about this is because of these arbitration clauses. so you unknowingly as a passenger for uber click on something saying, yes, i agree to arbitration i...

Explain and a lot of things they don't want to come out in public because there are some questionable activities. scrutiny in their case is not a good thing. that's why obviously they imported all of these arbitration clauses into their nondisclosure agreements and their settlement agreements. so they could keep all of these dealings in private arbitration, in private alternative dispute resolution. so that they could resolve them without anybody finding out. >> and danny, this week daniels' attorney seemed to change his message on what stormy daniels wants from the president. let's listen. >>...

>> yes, playboy, but not pornographic material. i think these women obviously, that is ms. mcdougal and ms. daniels would like to be able to share what their story is. they have set forth the reasons in their lawsuit. and, you know, there are many, many women who just refused to be silenced anymore. they want to stand up. they want to tell what their truth is. and they feel that the arbitration clauses that they were -- that they entered, that were in their arbitration agreements, their nondisclosure settlement agreements, you know, should be challenged. so a court will decide whether or not t...

>> there is. i agree it's signaling an intimidation tactic. i don't know how effective it is because it doesn't act as a legal claim. it's not a cause of action by itself. it's not even a demand. it's just telling the court, hey, in case you're wondering, here is why this claim is worth so much. courts in deciding whether they have jurisdiction in remove cases will look to four corners of the notice of removal and say is this at more than $75,000. they seem to have added it up. that's good enough for us. for now that's the only reason. i promise you the trump team will not be looking for that ...

There's pretty substantial law favoring in both federal and state courts, arbitration clauses. federal and state courts will send those cases right back down to arbitration. but in a case like this, trump's loss may not be in court, it may be when the information reaches the light of day. you cannot unring that bell. >> jeff, we were saying a few days ago when the white house spokesperson talked about arbitration that brought the story into the white house. nothing brings the story into the white house quite like this story tonight. so are they just going to have to continue to try to deflect ...