Stay updated with breaking news from Arms into syria. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20130901:12:03:00 vimarsana.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from vimarsana.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
International norm. but if we re the only ones willing have the willingness to step up and enforce it, it raises a question of what is really the believe in that norm in other countries. i m not saying that s a litmus test for me but it s certainly one of the factors. i think there s got to be a lot of discussion both in the congress but also among the american people. you talked about the poll that 80% of the people thought it should go to congress. i think it s 99% of the people that i m hearing from do not want us to get involved in syria. so the president and those who think this is the right step have a lot of educating to do over the next 10 days. by the way, i think the president kicking this over to congress was brilliant. not necessarily politically but congressionally but also because congress has a tendency to stand on the sidelines, ring its hands ....
Conflicts in bosnia and kosovo, made intervention that much more palatable for all of us. it made the next case for war a lot easier to make. when george w. bush wanted his own war with iraq, the public was with him. it was time to finish the job we started in the 90s, right? remember how easy that had been. this time votes weren t close. when bush got his war, that brings us to where we are today. there is a compelling case for entering in syria, also compelling reasons for restraint. the elephant in the room is iraq. what role iraq should or shouldn t play, ponder what to do in syria, tackle what comes next question, what comes next if we do go in after this. ....
Pentagon. for his part, the russian foreign minister didn t try to deny it. i don t understand why the media are trying to make this look like a sensation. we have never hidden the fact that we are supplying syria with arms. reports also indicate they supplied warships off the coast of syria and obvious attempt to show support for the assad government. the state department is trying to push an international conference in mid june in search of a negotiated solution to the rebellion which has killed more than 80,000 people. the u.s. wants russia to be a part of that. we have continued to work with the russians in planning the international conference and in working to get both sides back to the table to work toward a political transition. now iran wants to attend. that was flatly rejected by the french today, saying what is at stake is regional stability and we can t see how a country that represents a threat to stability could attend this conference. bret. bret: just to be cle ....
The suffering. so it s ill timed and unnorth nate. general definitely made it very clear that on the specific areas of the missiles, whatever else is involved with the russians does not help. it makes it more dangerous. at issue are new more sophisticated antiship cruise missiles with a longer range that the russians are supplying to syria, which general dempsey fears will give assad a false sense of security. what i really worry about is that assad will decide that since he s got these systems, he somehow is safer and more prone to a miscalculation. oddly enough, just an hour earlier in the face of repeated questions, state department spokeswoman flatly denied any knowledge of russia s supplying new weapons to syria. we re not aware of new shipments of these specific missiles. skeptical reporters kept going. she said they were year old reports which conflicts with the ....