Army Authentic Apparel Licensing Agreement News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Wednesday, March 17, 2021
Addressing a range of trademark licensing issues, including discretionary approval, exculpatory contract clauses and third party beneficiary standing, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court’s grant of summary judgment to the US Army, finding that the Army abided by the terms of a trademark licensing agreement with a brand management company that sold clothing bearing the Army logo. 
Authentic Apparel Grp., LLC v. United States, Case No. 20-1412 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2021) (Lourie, J.)
In a 2010 licensing agreement, the Army granted Authentic Apparel, a brand management company that licenses merchandise, a non-exclusive license to manufacture and sell clothing bearing the Army’s trademarks in exchange for royalties. The licensing agreement gave the Army sole and absolute discretion on whether to approve any products and marketing materials bearing the Army’s trademarks. The licensing agreement also ....

United States , Aaron Reuben , Authentic Apparel Grp , Us Army , Us Court , Federal Circuit , Authentic Apparel , Federal Claims , Intellectual Property , Llcv United States , Army Trademark Licensing Agreement , Army Authentic Apparel Licensing Agreement , ஒன்றுபட்டது மாநிலங்களில் , ரோன் ரூபன் , உண்மையானது ஆடை க்ர்ப் , எங்களுக்கு இராணுவம் , எங்களுக்கு நீதிமன்றம் , கூட்டாட்சியின் சுற்று , உண்மையானது ஆடை , கூட்டாட்சியின் கூற்றுக்கள் , அறிவுசார் ப்ராபர்டீ ,