Page 35 - Article Ii News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Much under the protected branch of government. finally, they don't need it. one of the things they would have to show is they have particular eyes. they couldn't get it any other way. so far every question we think they're going to ask, they have the answer to. >> sean: 1.4 million documents. this surprised me to find out don't mcgann, the white house counsel, gave 30 hours of testimony? >> 34 hours of testimony. >> sean: you don't need anything else. >> 1.4 million documents, 32 witnesses. here's the big question on obstruction. why did you fire comey? well -- >> sean: he doesn't have to answ...

Because of its significance in light of the trump presidency. the reason we're so interested in your view that that case was wrongly decided has lit toll do with the statute that was in question. it has everything to do with your views on the power of the executive. and what that would mean for this president and future presidents if you join the supreme court. justice scalia's morrison versus olson sole dissent embraces the so-called unitary executive theory which grants sweeping power to the president of the united states. scalia said, and i quote, we should say here that the president's con...

We also don't know what happens. i mean, again, we give the context, we'd actually have to see, and there are a couple different ways of interpreting it, once he steps out of office and he's no longer a sitting president, that also incorporates -- that also means there's definitely different ways of looking at it and that he could still be brought up on charges, to martin's point, as this laundry list keeps coming and coming and more and more and more comes out. >> martin, what's your legal take on that? >> well, you know, an interesting story. there had never been even any legal writing on th...

From the radio show and jake sekulow substitute hosted for him and rudy giuliani, the other presidential attorney call in and basically did sean hannity's show today. here's a little bit of chat, this just happened chatting about negotiations with mueller's team for an interview. >> i think the constitution's clear there's not a right to interview the president under article ii. i think the supreme court would come to that conclusion. i also raises serious issues of this president and future presidencies and especially with the nature and scope of the cooperation that this white house has give...

Is that true? as a prosecutor? in the whitewater investigation, did you get asked that all the time? >> the difference is the president is the president. and the client here has some control over these potential witnesses. so no, you know, of course prosecutors get influence order at least attempt to be influenced by people that could be affected by the work of the prosecutor. i mean, lawyers are trying to get the best deal for their clients. this is a really different situation, when the president is, under article ii, of the constitution, in charge of the criminal justice system at the feder...