Stay updated with breaking news from Article iii court. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Would not have been there had the filibuster existed. the federal bunch is an article iii court. i ll talk to stacey abrams later in the show and get her take. you also heard dana present reid with how people described him, scrappy, tough, blunt, mastermind, ruthless. he didn t dispute it, did he? he was. he was all those things. and i think people were always taken aback by it. he was not a big, muscular guy. he was somewhat slight as an individual but he was tough. he was loyal to his friend and certainly little for the tiny little place that he came from. and he was proud coming up in the way he did. you can t deal with harry reid without seeing there was a complexity there that is really, really striking, many good things accomplished, some things ....
A massive loss by the court of appeals of the d.c. circuit. the court unanimously rejects his attempt to evade the january 6th committee s request for white house records with the tenuous argument of executive privilege. the police tering opinion, written by judge patricia millet lays out exactly why, quote, the president and the legislative branch have shown a national interest and a pressing need for the prompt disclosure of these documents. what mr. trump seeks is to have an article iii court intervene and nullify those judgments of the president and congress, derail the committee s work. but essential to the rule of law is the principle that a former president must meet the same legal standards for obtaining preliminary injunctive relief as everyone else. former president trump has failed that task. the former president now has two weeks to appeal to the supreme court, which will ultimately decide whether congress gets the white house records. harry litman is a former deputy assist ....
Balances power to preserve democracy and to ensure liberty. for that reason, the executive privilege for presidential communications is a qualified one that mr. trump agrees must give way when necessary to protect overriding interests. the president and the legislative branch have shown a national interest in and pressing need for the prompt disclosure of these documents. what trump seeks is to have an article iii court intervene and nullify those and derail the negotiations and accommodations that the political branches have made. but essential to the rule of law is the principle that a former president must meet the same legal standards for obtaining preliminary injunctive relief as everybody else. former president trump has failed that task. benjamin franklin said at the founding that we have a republic if we can keep it. the events of january 6th expose the fragility of those democratic institutions and traditions that we had perhaps come to take for granted. ....
Is used in the senate. in most instances, house members have suggested in debates on articles of whether or not to approve articles of impeachment, that they should be have clear and convincing evidence in the view of the members voting on it there was some impeachable offense. that is all. some not even that standard. it is simply enough evidence an accusation can be made. it is definitely a lower standard than a standard that has to be met here on a trial for an ultimate verdict. the constitution speaks in terms of a conviction in the senate. as both professor dershowitz and judge starr pointed out in their comments, anywhere in the constitution it is spoken about impeachment it is spoken in terms of criminal law, the offenses that define the jurisdiction for the senate for the court of impeachment are ....
Of course, within some constraints. there s roles for congress in foreign affairs to some extent. the statutes can be passed, funding provisions can be passed that relate to it, but the supreme court has recognized time and again that the president is as the court said in curtis wright, the sole organ of the nation in foreign affairs. so he sets foreign policy, and if staffers disagree with him, that does not mean that the president is doing something wrong. and this is a critical point because this is one of the center pieces of the abuse of power theory that the house managers would like this body to adopt, and that is that they are going to impeach the president based solely on his subjective motive, the premise of their case is the object of actions that were taken were perfectly permissible and within the president s constitutional authority, but if his real reason if we get inside his ....