Avalanche Effect News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

him. so if you watched garland carefully, his press conference the other day, you may have noticed that he appeared highly annoyed by the idea of having to stoop to explain himself to mere citizens. he found a solution. being a liberal, merrick garland's first instinct was to seize the role of victim, because when you're a victim you've already won the argument. you don't have to explain yourself. you don't have to change your behavior. you're by definition the good guy. the victim always is. being oppressed means never having to say you're sorry. so as garland explained in the press...

The entire front of the occupiers will crumble.

Nobody w ever pursued him the wy they should have. and it wasasnd all happening rit under the nose of the fdny who loves to get on l their ivoy tower and preach down to t the rest of us on a regulars basis about how bad we live l our lives. meanwhile, this guy was runningv around in their district for four presidencies hanging out at the white house. you know, they're all of it and nobody cares what's goingng on until the survivors themselves decide to go andnd take the case to the people. and we w see what's happened. since then, there's been an avalanche effect and they've to it really quick...

Should have, and it was happening under the nose of the fdny, who loves to get on their ivory tower and preach down to the rest of us on a regular basis how bad we live our lives. meanwhile, he was running around in their district, for four presidencies, hanging out at the white house, and nobody cares what's going on until the survivors themselves decide to take the case to the people, and we see what's happened since then. there's been an avalanche effect. they've had to react to it. >> tucker: really quick, you keep reading suggestions that there's a trove of videotape of other people at ep...

Women are coming forward and i don't want to become the story. there may be more to say later. certainly it's a question that media organizations do right by stories like this but i don't want to get into private communications like that. >> let's talk more broadly about the coverage of this weinstein effect. i hate using his name, giving his name the effect here, but as a result of the harvey weinstein stories we've seen dozens of other men accused. your view on this as a journalism ethics expert, what are journalists getting right and getting wrong while covering these accounts of harassment...