Stay updated with breaking news from Benghazi hearing. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Joining the white house team from our own hallie jackson will be trey gowdy, who ran that benghazi hearing. the white house is very worried about those numbers. republicans who support the president are worried about the polling numbers. there is a huge desire to get an impeachment vote, any impeachment vote of any kind right now before the possibility of those numbers moving. the president would like to show strength. if there is a vote right now, they think they can keep republicans together. i heard pete baker talking earlier about this real push from republicans to talk about process. that s something that s unifying for them. but if you see more facts come out, if you see this process moving forward, if the public changes a little bit over time you might start to see some republican defections. so i think all of that is part and parcel of this strategy where you see a lot of the president s most vociferous defenders coming out today like you did in arguing about process. molly, ....
Work for. here s andrej saying hi kut let me know when you can talk and possible it make this declaration and mention all of these things which we discussed yesterday. but it will be logic to do after we receive a confirmation of states. we inform about date of visit in about our expectation in our guarantees for future visits. let s discuss it. so joel back to you does this seem like customary communication? it s not only noncustomary, it s completely off the book. these are communications that were done through an encrypted text messaging system known as signal. tfsz not done through state department e-mail chain, it was to evade any kind of oversight that had the secretary is now complaining that is somehow bullying the sate department which i find ironic because mike when he was into congress was one of the leading aggressive overseers of the state department through the benghazi ....
Remember when barr was coming, nadler wasn t in going to let any member s question him. he was going to have a staff or no one ever heard of. so i don t know why they are upset. at least some of them are getting to ask mueller something with the barr. he wasn t going to let any of them talk. martha: it when you oversaw the benghazi hearing, it went on much longer. how were you able to negotiate for that longer time period? that was a little different, she was running for president, obviously she wanted to answer all of the questions. we enlarged the 5 minutes to 10 minutes because you can t do anything in 5 minutes, and at the end, the media still said we didn t learn anything new. you re not going to learn anything new next wednesday anyway. one of the house members you just played a clip from, i can t help, that it s one of the most ludicrous are arguments have er heard. 35 members of the house, 95% of them are not on intel or ....
It with a straight face is remarkable. donald trump could hold an oval office address, put on a witch s pointy hat, stand on a broom and say, i confess, and you d still have the far right saying this is a witch-hunt. thz nothing he there s nothing here. jen will take any facts out there and turn them into something ex-culpatory. 101 indictments against five people, five guilty pleads against guilty people tells you everything. in terms of length of time, this talking points cracks me up. 60 months is the briblink of an. the country has attention deaf ted disorder i understand, but look at bill clinton. it was six years. the benghazi hearing was twice as long as what s going on. hypocrisy is off the charts. two things missed. one is, look, i don t think this ....
And their performance with peter strzok? they behaved like children, it was a humiliating day to be a republican. we saw it time after time. note also this was not about getting answers from strzok. goodlatte toward the end of the day each get your five minutes but strzok doesn t get to answer. it reminded me of how mccarthy described the benghazi hearing. it was about hurting her poll numbers, not an investigation of facts. that s what we saw yesterday. this is part of the incremental strategy of both trump, yes, those in congress who go along with him to undermine the integrity of the investigation from the very beginning. when he with saw rod rosenstein today, there was a moment, that clip you just played, withhere wondered is he on his way out? he s saying i m going to move in this direction, i m going mack a statement about the law and integrity of the country despite what congress and the president might do to me as a result of that. but the reaction is important. the reaction ....