Because i have never known justice alito to be nothing but a man of integrity. when i saw this flag, it is irrelevant whether mrs. alito flew it or not. the fact is that flag was there. that flag is an irrefutable symbol, not just for people who still challenge the legitimacy of the election but who actually violently attacked the capitol. so this is not an insignificant symbol. irrespective of why it s there. it shouldn t have been placed there. that flag is incendiary. and it cannot do anything other than raise a reasonable inference of bias. as i said in my piece, i don t know if justice alito is biased or not. but there, i don t think any reasonable person could not
The points there. so judge cannon blew up the schedule today and she announced this new, i guess, sort of series of hearings or mega hearings. she s going to hear trump s challenge to jack smith, even being on this as special counsel, she s going to hear trump s requests to throw out the the evidence found at mar-a-lago, which obviously is the entire point. what is judge cannon doing here? tie judge cannon is kicking the can down the road is on she can and delaying both the trial, which is clearly clearly her purpose and when i say purpose, it is purposeful now, it s not mirror ineptitude. this is clearly a palpable bias on her part, and i think i heard one former florida judge say the same thing earlier today everybody sort of caught on der ac now. but it also evidence is her style. she wants to avoid at all costs, making a decision
Them. so and the fact they took umbrage with my sign is telling enough it shows like a bias, doesn t mean it. well, i mean, i want to talk about that, but just to be very clear on the timing, he saying that that she put up the flag because you said those things? but when we look at their was actually you called 911 on that day? there s actually a police report about that incident and that shows that the timing doesn t work. the flag was up before the flag picture that was weeks before that isn t actually happening where you called where you call for that work. so what he s saying here, you re saying at best mistaken, but it s certainly is just it s categorically by the date is not true. right? she didn t put the flag up for that reason. absolutely 100%. and that s what i want to really drive home to people, is that this happened on february 15 and we know that because they had been harassing us so long that we were like we need a paper trail of this, like we d better call the cops right now. like i said, these are federally protected people. they have security detail, they represent
You can do with intelligence is shared with your adversary. he and his secret is betrayed. it the bullet to the back of the hand secrets and spies, a nuclear gain sunday at ten on cnn tonight, justice alito s neighbors speaking out in her first tv interview, emily baden lived near the home of supreme court justice samuel alito. it is at the center of a neighborhood dispute. that involves this upside down american flag flying at alito s home in northern virginia. this picture was taken in january of 2021. alito facing accusations of bias. now, he s now refused to recuse himself from january 6, related cases are trump-related cases, saying that it was his wife who flew that flag, which boris was a banner on january 6, and he said it s also his wife flew another flag at their vacation home. flag also use by insurrectionists on january 6 it says you didn t know about that one. alito also defending his wife saying she flew the
Symbol, not just for people who still challenge the legitimacy of the election. but who actually violently attack the capitol so this is not insignificant. irrespective of why it was there, it shouldn t have been there. the problem is that flag is incendiary and it cannot do anything other than raise a reason inference of bias. i don t know if justice alito is biased or not. but i don t think any reasonable person could not think that telegraphs at least the appearance of bias. and that is so important. this is a time when trust and faith in the u.s. supreme court