Live Breaking News & Updates on Big Significant Climate Science
Stay updated with breaking news from Big significant climate science. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Time, matt. nobody s making aborgs about science. i didn t bring up the issue. you did, abortion the idea of when life begins guess what? is science. nobody knows. you can believe it begins at conception, you can believe it begins 40 days after the way the jews in, you can believe in viability. i ll just believe in the science. that s not what the science is behind climate change. each unique life they re not the same thing. the science of when life begins is unquestionable and the question on climate change actually there s a diversity on the science, and we to have political disagreements but i think it s wrong in this country when we call people who have a contrary position a liar, and that s what s dominating the coverage. ana that s a fair point. just because you disagree you call someone a liar. i agree with matt. disagreement, but that s also not the case with a lot. ....
What do you think will happen when they digest the findings and how they will release it to the public? a lot of scientists have been talking to me about the ways in which this is a test case for the administration. this is the first big significant climate science report poised to come out of this administration. it s really not clear what s going to happen. you know, in some ways this is a technical report, and different administrations might handle it very differently. you know, the obama administration you could envision with a big rose garden ceremony to present a report like this. maybe until the bush administration it would be just quietly released without any fanfare. scientists in this case tell me they are worried it wouldn t come out at all. whether or not it will or not is a wait-and-see game at this ....
It, tell us what you think are the big headlines. i think the main takeaway from this report is that scientists are saying that half of the warming over the past four decades can be linked to human activity. that directly goes against what is we ve been hearing from many members of the administration who say that, while climate change is happening and there is some human link, it can t be determined how much or what left of human activity is responsible for warming. these scientists from across federal agencies in the united states say that s not true. what do they make of resistance from the administration which is couched as skepticism about the human link within the science, and their concerns about whether or not this report would be made public? sure. so, you know, this report has ....
Climate change as lying about the science, and i think you should take that back. i don t think that s accurate. there s a great diversity of views from scientists, true climatologists, not just people with ph.d. who are liberal professors across the country or embedded in bur ras crassy. auto not a scientist and neither are you. matt it s inherently misleading. i ll say it again. that s the same thing as a lie. that s the synonym. what you re saying well call it what you want. i see the definition of lying as being pretty plain. factual inaccuracy done with intention to deceive. right. that s the definition of a lie. it s a good one. i think you show own it. i like that definition. when it comes to how much temperature is changing, when will big shifts happen, that s going to be soft. they don t know. the predictions and the contentions vary. but you have again 13 government agencies, scientists from each ....
I m a skeptic of that. i m not a liar on that issue. you re also not a scientist and so what? when you have 13 agencies from the scientists from the government saying it s a credibility issue. it s wrong, chris. that s why people don t trust the white house. it s wrong for people in the media to say on issues of abortion, on climate change, on the how is abortion and climate change the same thing, matt? it s about science. guess what? you re wrong on the science, many of you who believe that people on the pro-life side aren t looking at the science of it, come on, the science is on my side on the unique human nature of every unborn child. it s about ethics and morality, it s not about science. just because someone s on the other side please don t call them a liar. who is helping it has can i tell you something? hold on i get a lot of this. you like to throw a label on something you don t like. i get it, politically persuasive but it s also b.s. a lot o ....