Page 2 - Big Tech Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

They were to make such a ruling, it would have huge ripple effects on the internet. it's more likely this gets punted to congress. >> it seems like a legislative action. how could either case change the way we use the internet if they were to surprise us with their rulings? >> let's say you took that immunity away from tech platforms and they were held accountable for everything. it would shut down the internet. no more comment sections. you couldn't post anything about authenticating your identity. think about any commenting platform, yelp, trip advisers, all those businesses would be under w...

Looking at each person referred, weighing if there is enough evidence to bring a case to court. in series of interviews about the grand jury proceedings, she revealed they heard from witnesses who haven't been reporting. mark meadows. >> he didn't share very much at all. >> reporter: and mark short, former chief of staff to mike pence. she stopped short saying whether or not donald trump was on the list of indictments. >> i will say when this list comes out, there are no major plot twists waiting. >> reporter: pointing out that donald trump was a frequent name before the panel. >> we definitel...

Responsible under this anti-terrorism act, if they found that way, they wouldn't have to address the limits of section 230 and the case we heard yesterday. that might be a way to skirt the issue, at least for now. >> sara, yesterday, the supreme court heard arguments for the other internet speech case involving google. tell us the similarities. >> both of them take into account whether or not tech plat forms should be libel for the content evidence users post. but with the google case yesterday, it was whether or not google should be immune. and today they were talking about whether twitter sh...

Knowingly support terrorist activities on the flip side. the attorney or the victim's family made this far-reaching argument that twitter could be held responsible for every terrorist attack. so that argument seemed to go too far for these justices. >> read the tea leaves even further. do you think the justices signaled about how they might rule? >> yeah, there are some thought on this. the justices are very aware of how much upheaval a ruling in the victim's favor could bring in this case, obviously sense it would change the way the internet is run. they pushed back extensively on the attorne...

To truth social. in this case, this is his opinion. he slammed her calling this an illegal kangaroo court. that's not true, sit a legal court. but i wouldn't expect anyone to do any differently than what donald trump did, given what the grand jury foreperson is doing. >> i mean, what they ought -- this is going to be a teachable moment, this is a learning moment, this is a process -- >> such a mom. >> this is a process about how civil society in a representative democracy self-governs. t i mean, the idea that there is some genuine wisdom in just normal people out there getting together and del...