Page 5 - Bit Concern News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

To bomb john brenan's house. shouldn't it concern the media that former intel officials are using their credentials to lend themselves credibility as they go off to engage in political combat with the president of the united states? the truth is former intel officials have retained their security clearances for decades. not as a booby prize for service but to benefit the government, maybe consulting work and so forth. for instance the cia is working on a case involving something a former in tell official had worked on, he can use his continued access to act as a reference. maybe give some insi...

Power, you have to tell the fbi. too many people were approached. >> would it concern if you there offer of dirt wasn't real but a fbi concoction? >> a lot of times they use informants if they have an idea this person is prone or susceptible -- >> would that concern you in this case? >> no. >> if they had evidence that individuals in the trump team were eager and willing to work with russians and they wanted to see how deep this ran, that's just an investigative tactic. >> stay with me. with he have someone that knows roger stone better than you. >> i watched his film. >> all right. there is h...

Trump campaign, with the possibility -- >> does it concern you that's the goal, or do you think it's a coincidence these relate to past special counsels? >> i don't think it's a coincidence that these charges, for instance, relate to campaign finance abuse, or abuse of power, or obstruction of yesterday, or lying to the federal government. these are some of the charges upon which individuals have already pled guilty, or are being prosecuted or potentially investigated. and so i think it's reasonable for people to at least be suspicious that that is exactly what's taken place. the other problem...

Rod rosenstein knows exactly what happened and what's in the development requested by congress. either the matter warranted investigation and he did nothing or saw the facts and believes nothing is wrong. it's a ruse. >> i don't think it's a ruse. it's a step forward. we'll see how important a step forward it is. you ask if i was satisfied there's an important element. there's been a narrative we have been wanting to know the individual or source. we don't care at all. we have never asked for information regarding him at all. we want the under lying information. that's important to us. and we ...

Announce subsequent schedules for data dumps. >> you have also said quote let's be clear, i had no advanced notice of wikileaks hacking of podesta's e-mails. can you say you had no advanced knowledge that the hacked e-mails existed? >> yes, i absolutely categorically can. >> yes, and we addressed the john podesta question. >> special counsel mueller's, have been -- does it concern you that you vice presidehaven't be. >> the source is sam nunberg, how reliable a source is he? i have done nothing wrong. and i have substantial bank of e-mails. i am involved in politics.