Page 37 - Brian Gilbert News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

written seriously, in my opinion. this report is supposed to accurately assess impacts, identify them, and address of these impacts will be dealt with. with regard to an aquatic park in particular, it has failed to do so in a disingenuous manner. i say there are no impacts. the only way that can be done is to close your eyes completely to reality. the overview that i get from this draft report -- which is really the report of the next comments and responses -- is that this event is seeking to use almost every square inch of san francisco's waterfront, and this is the bay area, and th...

in particular, it has failed to do so in a disingenuous manner. i say there are no impacts. the only way that can be done is to close your eyes completely to reality. the overview that i get from this draft report -- which is really the report of the next comments and responses -- is that this event is seeking to use almost every square inch of san francisco's waterfront, and this is the bay area, and that they belongs to citizens and visitors of the citibank -- and that they belongs to citizens and visitors of that city. in claiming every square inch of the waterfront, what the prop...

secondary viewing areas, and they make things up to justify the proposed use. aquatic park is one of those identified as a secondary viewing area. if i call your attention to section 5.11 0.3 points to -- 5.11.3.2, they talk about short-term recreational uses. and they say -- accurately in theory -- that a short-term disruption does not necessarily mean a significant impact. they say if you have many bicycle paths and you restrict use of one, not a problem. they also talk about temporary disruption. that has nothing to do with the america's cup being proposed. we're talking about six...

secondary viewing areas, and they make things up to justify the proposed use. aquatic park is one of those identified as a secondary viewing area. if i call your attention to section 5.11 0.3 points to -- 5.11.3.2, they talk about short-term recreational uses. and they say -- accurately in theory -- that a short-term disruption does not necessarily mean a significant impact. they say if you have many bicycle paths and you restrict use of one, not a problem. they also talk about temporary disruption. that has nothing to do with the america's cup being proposed. we're talking about six...

and respects in the current activities. along with that, this is a special place in that when you look at the environmental impact, what the report is supposed to do, it identified the biological needs of those users. your the last of the top clubs along the waterfront. -- we are the last of two clubs along the waterfront. we are an endangered species. if you do not respect that, we haven't lived and swam and being active in san francisco bay for 134 years, we're not going to be around at the impact is significant to put us at risk and if the environmental impact studies take into ac...