Page 3 - Cake Baker News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

>> she didn't say i can't use my artistic talent, i don't want to be part of this. she said my wait staff is unsafe. we used to use words unsafe like for domestic violence victim going to get a restraining order. she said my people don't feel comfort wbl these people in our restaurant. >> i totally get it. i'm just saying if she in the desserts she was going to make was expressing speech, it's the same as the cake baker. >> if she was. >> let me back up. i know you follow the arguments as i did this past monday in the supreme court on the same issue. it's incredible the timing of all of this. ...

Artist or creating something custom, then the state can't force her to express a message she doesn't agree with. and the liberals you can imagine pounce order that because they said what is the limiting principle here? justin sotomayor said what about someone who doesn't like interracial marriages or somebody with a bias against people with physical disabilities. and justice jackson asked what if a photographer at a mall taking pictures with children at santa only wants white children to sit on santa's lap, can they say no white children is allowed? they were really looking for that limited pr...

Opposition to same sex marriage. what do you make of this case? what are you looking for? >> i think it's very troubling that the court is taking a case like this, because remember, it's the court to get to choose its cases. by doing so is that the agenda. it has been on a bit of a path here to deny lgbt rights in the name of religious freedom. this is about free speech, about a web designer says she doesn't want to do web pages for same-sex marriages. but substitute same-sex for black or any other demographic and you see observe how absurd it is that we are allowing this kind of discriminatio...

Here to deny lgbt rights in the name of religious freedom. this is about free speech, about a web designer says she doesn't want to do web pages for same-sex marriages. but substitute same-sex for black or any other demographic and you see observe how absurd it is that we are allowing this kind of discrimination in the name of free speech, a religious liberty. but the fact that the court has taken on this case, after ruling in fail favor of a cake baker on similar grounds a few years ago, does not bode well for lgbtq rights in the future. >> thomas wolf, thank you, barbara please stick around....

Exceptions for these foster care decisions. there were no families who were discriminated against by this particular agency, no couple that wanted to have foster care that wasn't able to get it. so many other alternatives. there's no need to force a religious organization to go against its beliefs in order to provide those services for a wide range of couples. we are seeing is a unanimous rejection of the religious intolerant left. there's a way to have a live and let live situation. it's something the court recognize unanimously. and rejected the idea that it has to be -- you have to force ot...