Page 24 - Case Doesn T News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Tyrannical socialism. democrats abandoned it. the only time democrats and liberal, people that talk about the recovery act is this debate of it should have been bigger. that's bizarre. what your book has convinced me that didn't matter that much, even if it was an extra $200 bill lower or $300 billion it wouldn't have made a difference of where we are now. >> it goies to your guest who ws on food stamps. in the fourth quarter of 2008 gdp fell at a 9% annual rate. that's a depression. at that rate we would have lost an entire canadian economy in 2009. in january 2009 we lost 800,000 jobs. then ...

Of state. there are many forms of acceptable photo i.d.s but every i.d. must have a current expiration date. elsewhere in the letter it says a student i.d. is valid but a bucknell i.d. doesn't have an expiration. you say i have a student i.d. and our page in question voted the last time around as a bucknell student. and you can read that very easily and then say -- when you think about okay what's the theory of the case here about the voter fraud that's happening? right? like there is someone going around collecting old bucknell i.d.s because they know -- that's the theory of the case. there's...

Million job hole and this was a 3 million job solution. there was no stimulus. >> in the book you're pretty tough on liberals. >> that's right. >> you make the case that liberals didn't defend -- that they should have stood with the law and defended the policy, defended the legislation. sam seder, you're a liberal. why didn't you defend it in >> it was not big enough. the question is whether could it have been bigger is debatable. >> not debatable. >> look even if i stipulate that it could not have been bigger in any way although we mentioned how the republicans had already voted for one, $750...

Then they -- >> i hate to tell you, this but i don't actuallily think it is inching toward the end. i do think, here is what happened. the ninth circuit of appeals ruled in favor of gay marriage, basically in california. then the people who were opposed gay marriage appealed. they wanted the entire ninth circuit court of appeals all the judges to re-hear that decision and the judges said no in a fast tracks it to go up to the supreme court. >> all about overturning the california vote against gay marriage that's what it is all about. >> that's going to up potentially to the u.s. supreme court ...

Then they -- >> i hate to tell you, this but i don't actuallily think it is inching toward the end. i do think, here is what happened. the ninth circuit of appeals ruled in favor of gay marriage, basically in california. then the people who were opposed gay marriage appealed. they wanted the entire ninth circuit court of appeals all the judges to re-hear that decision and the judges said no in a fast tracks it to go up to the supreme court. >> all about overturning the california vote against gay marriage that's what it is all about. >> that's going to up potentially to the u.s. supreme court ...