Decisions and interventions
Andrew Elliot Board and Christine Anne Haniver Application 12092-2020 Reasons 13 January 2021 The first respondent (admitted 1973) and the second respondent (clerk) denied the allegations made against them by the applicant and the SDT found the allegations not proved. The SDT therefore ordered that the allegations be dismissed and further that there be no order for costs. In December 2012, the first and second respondents had been appointed as joint attorneys under a lasting power or attorney for property and financial affairs on behalf of client A. At around the same time they had also been ...
Source: lawgazette.co.uk