PTAB Newsletter - Patent - United States
Federal Circuit Precedential Decision: The Board Did Not Violate the APA by Changing Its Claim Construction Between the Preliminary Guidance and FWD on a Motion to Amend.
Stay updated with breaking news from Challenged Patent. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Federal Circuit Precedential Decision: The Board Did Not Violate the APA by Changing Its Claim Construction Between the Preliminary Guidance and FWD on a Motion to Amend.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal recently altered a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) to address the use of applicant admitted prior art...
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. - Before Lourie, Reyna and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. - Summary: “At...
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issued updated guidance on acceptable uses of applicant admitted prior art (AAPA) in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings under 35 U.S.C. § 311.1...
The Federal Circuit released its decision in Qualcomm v. Apple providing guidance on AAPA in IPR proceedings. In doing so, the Federal Circuit vacated two IPR decisions of the PTAB where the PTAB had found several claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,063,674 unpatentable.