Stay updated with breaking news from Charles let. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Fact that the judge is imposing his views on what is happening. brett: charles, in the appeal in the ninth circuit, the hist would lean toward the judge s ruling being withheld? absolutely. what is so ironic about the discussion where obama stands he is now irrelevant. it s in the hands of the court. it on doesn t matter what the president thinks or what the congress think or what the people think. it s go going to be decided by a bunch of judges and ultimately by the nine on the supreme court. that is what is wrong with doing it this way. what obama can say, what he thinks about it is irrelevant but he has now appointed two justices that will rule the way he wants and the way he wants. brett: and they make the point that running quickly, in the fall to remind voters about the judicial appointment ....
Care more about economic issues. but i think it s interesting from his comments on the human rights. there is a wink and nod understanding that he favors gay marriage but he can t say that. if you get in discussions with supporters about that, they ll talk about it quite openly. we really think he supports it but he can t say it. as for the real question, i agree with charles and clear that the trends are heading in this direction, but even people that support some kind of institutionalize go of committed same sex relationships, myself included, you have to have reservations about the way it was done. to call this sweeping i think is an understatement. if you read through the opinion there is a lot of soft, social science that the judge seems to be relying on and at times makes broad statements without any anchor in reality or the law. it s a troubling trend in the ....
Protections that every other american family enjoys. we believe we are the important part of the fabric that america the great nation it is and we believe we should be a part of every single aspect and part of every institution of american society. what one judge did in has overruled millions of americans in 39 states, all americans should be treated equally, but that doesn t mean that you change the institution of marriage. brett: supporters of california s gay marriage ban filed an appeal with the ninth circuit court of appeals after the federal judge ruled striking down the voter approved law, proposition 8 in california. what happens next? what about the politics surrounding this issue? let s bring our panel, steve hayes, welcome julie mason and charles. charles let s start with the ....
Advantage for him that people care more about economic issues. but i think it s interesting from his comments on the human rights. there is a wink and nod understanding that he favors gay marriage but he can t say that. if you get in discussions with supporters about that, they ll talk about it quite openly. we really think he supports it but he can t say it. as for the real question, i agree with charles and clear that the trends are heading in this direction, but even people that support some kind of institutionalize go of committed same sex relationships, myself included, you have to have reservations about the way it was done. to call this sweeping i think is an understatement. if you read through the opinion there is a lot of soft, social science that the judge seems to be relying on and at times makes broad statements without any anchor in reality or the law. ....
It s a troubling trend in the fact that the judge is imposing his views on what is happening. brett: charles, in the appeal in the ninth circuit, the hist would lean toward the judge s ruling being withheld? absolutely. what is so ironic about the discussion where obama stands he is now irrelevant. it s in the hands of the court. it on doesn t matter what the president thinks or what the congress think or what the people think. it s go going to be decided by a bunch of judges and ultimately by the nine on the supreme court. that is what is wrong with doing it this way. what obama can say, what he thinks about it is irrelevant but he has now appointed two justices that will rule the way he wants and the way he wants. brett: and they make the point that running quickly, in the fall to remind voters about the judicial appointment ....