Page 7 - Claimsr News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Idea that iran can't be trusted or lying. i'm not taking issue with that but i'm wondering if the status quo is better than tearing it up because at least the inspectors could go in and if you tear it up, there are no inspectors going in. >> but the status quo is a nuclear iran and that is a problem and if it needs to be changed this president will do it. >> white house deputy press secretary hogan gidley. thank you. >> who is behind the leak of the robert mueller questions? there is speculation it might be a familiar face. stay with us. today, 97% of employers agree that skills like teamwork,...

Something in there that may communicate to the broader public, if you have a doctor willing to do so, that his health was perhaps not the healthiest. maybe he's upset about the hair growth issue but it is striking me as a kind of practice that goes above and beyond normal behavior to send in three people, one of whom has a big -- a big guy to scare the -- daylights -- >> scare the heck out of -- >> out of the doctor. here is a theme, which dr. bornstein -- this gushing thing about president trump's health and then candidate trump's health and rear admiral ronny jackson said that he thought tha...

>> sources tell cnn, trump's legal team outlined nearly 50 questions based on conversations with mueller, spanning issues from collusion to obstruction of justice, to trump's business dealings in moscow. while trump is adamant his campaign never colluded with the russians -- >> look at how these politicians have fallen for this junk. russian collusion. give me a break. >> reporter: mueller still wants to know whether trump knew about any outreach to russia by his campaign or his former campaign chairman paul manafort. and mueller probes whether the president tried to obstruct justice and he wa...

Preserving them not having an active clandestine nuclear weapons program. john kerry, the former secretary of state under obama who -- this was his baby, this deal, he argues if you tear up the deal, then you go back to when they did have an active nuclear weapons program but if you keep the deal, then that program is in the past. >> right. but it is not. that is the whole point. the premise that the deal was negotiated upon in the first place was that they were so far away from creating anything in a military nuclear method. instead, they have ballistic missile capability. we know they are so...

Latest updates on this topic from reliable sources.